• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Cascode - Question about Cg2

I'm modding my front end into a Cascode configuration and intend to bias G2 with a potential divider...

In his hi-fi Preamplifier book, Blencowe mentions that by omitting the screen grid bypass cap (Cg2) on the lower resistor of the potential divider we can allow PS noise into the screen grid as a NFB, which then increases the PSRR substantially.
Anyone tried this?
Does it affect the sound quality in any way?

I can't find this hack mentioned anywhere, only his book.
His valve wizard site omits this hack in its otherwise copied cascode chapter.
The Valve Wizard
 
This is one of those things IMHO you just have to try and listen to (easy enough to do). It could change the way it sounds? Might also affect the gain? No idea sorry. In my messing with cascode designs, I just left it in. If you want to reduce ripple/hum, I'd focus on PS filtering as that ends up everywhere, especially in an SE amp.
 
I connect another cap from g2 to B+, the buzz is still there, but no change to the sound that I can detect. The caps are for bypassing ripple hum if any, my case the buzz is coming from the RCA input, loud if I turn off the CD player, so those caps are really only necessary when is B+ is dirty.


Ps btw I just remember for real Pentode mode g2 should be bypassed (make reference) to the cathode, in the cascode, the cathode of the bottom triode, I try in sim, output level increase a bit, not much, don't how sound may changed.
 
Last edited:
Here how to plot the pentode curve of cascode, it's also possible to plot triode connected mode.
 

Attachments

  • Pseudo pentode curve.png
    Pseudo pentode curve.png
    52.7 KB · Views: 255
The plot is done by using Ltspice freely download from Linear Technology.
LTspice Simulator | Analog Devices
Beside software download and installation, tubes model files are also required for building the simulation files to run the plot sweep or other functions. I built models for Diyers, they can be used for other Spice family software too. The simulation file has .asc extension and is often passed around for sharing without also passing many files associated with it since it's already installed in you pc.
 
This is one of those things IMHO you just have to try and listen to (easy enough to do). It could change the way it sounds? Might also affect the gain? No idea sorry. In my messing with cascode designs, I just left it in. If you want to reduce ripple/hum, I'd focus on PS filtering as that ends up everywhere, especially in an SE amp.

Ok, Stephe - just waiting on parts..
 
Completed!

Well, I've done it.
I ended up trying John Broskie's "Akido Mojo" Cascode enhancement at am attempt at improving the inherent poor PSRR of this configuration with good results, ie, adding another cap across the top resistor of the potential divider feeding G2.
Got a much flatter frequency response with an extended top end.
Overall power output has increased compared to the original parallel configuration - now at just under 6Wrms per channel.
Very happy with the results!
Thanks to all!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210914_163842__01.jpg
    IMG_20210914_163842__01.jpg
    1,022 KB · Views: 171
  • IMG_20210914_163853.jpg
    IMG_20210914_163853.jpg
    982.9 KB · Views: 170
  • Screenshot_20210918-130618.jpg
    Screenshot_20210918-130618.jpg
    203.4 KB · Views: 183
  • Screenshot_20210918-130523.jpg
    Screenshot_20210918-130523.jpg
    276.1 KB · Views: 154
  • IMG_20210918_130736.jpg
    IMG_20210918_130736.jpg
    749.1 KB · Views: 90
  • Screenshot_20210914-173135.jpg
    Screenshot_20210914-173135.jpg
    545.7 KB · Views: 102
  • IMG_20210918_133249.jpg
    IMG_20210918_133249.jpg
    428.4 KB · Views: 104
  • IMG_20210918_133445.jpg
    IMG_20210918_133445.jpg
    396.8 KB · Views: 92
  • IMG_20210918_133825__01.jpg
    IMG_20210918_133825__01.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 84
Last edited:
Which tube model you think is more accurate? If anyone has plotted the curve with tracer let's know thank in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Pseudo pentode curve 2.png
    Pseudo pentode curve 2.png
    135.2 KB · Views: 77
  • Pseudo pentode curve 3.png
    Pseudo pentode curve 3.png
    154.1 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
Which tube model you think is more accurate? If anyone has plotted the curve with tracer let's know thank in advance.

In the second plot, it looks like the Ayumi model lines up closest to theoretical results. The others all seem to increase conduction gradually from well below the plate voltage of the bottom triode, which is not how the cascode curves are supposed to look. Interesting.