purely curiosity sake really, as I will be using these tweeters anyway.
have had them for many years now, and for the life of me I cannot remember what they are.
there are NO markings on the tweeter at all, apart from 'plus and minus'.
to be used in my build over here
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=127653&perpage=25&pagenumber=1
have had them for many years now, and for the life of me I cannot remember what they are.
there are NO markings on the tweeter at all, apart from 'plus and minus'.
to be used in my build over here
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=127653&perpage=25&pagenumber=1
They look like MDT37/DMT37 with an additional plastic cup on the back.
http://ldsg.snippets.org/vendors/morel.php
http://ldsg.snippets.org/vendors/morel.php
I wonder...
someone posted a morel catalog once, and even in there I couldn't find it. The biggest difference between mine and any I've seen is the depth of the driver, and as you say even in this example mine seems a lot deeper that the pic shown. I must have had that depth thing in the back of my mind when I took the photo, that's why I included the match box.
An unspoken assumption there,,,are match box sizes the same between countries??
The tweeter I have is rather sensitive, I do recall that from my measurements. will browse a bit more in the link you gace, maybe even do a comparative frequency sweep to see if that helps nail it down.
as I say, a bit academic as I am using it anyway but it would be good to nail it down just for 'reference' sake.
BTW, the back bit is not plastic (if that is important), I just assumed it was a shield, yet it is quite magnetic
EDIT had a quick browse thru your link, it certainly seems quite close doesn't it. Wonder why it has a deeper profile??
thanks for your help, unless something more definitive comes up it does look like it.
someone posted a morel catalog once, and even in there I couldn't find it. The biggest difference between mine and any I've seen is the depth of the driver, and as you say even in this example mine seems a lot deeper that the pic shown. I must have had that depth thing in the back of my mind when I took the photo, that's why I included the match box.
An unspoken assumption there,,,are match box sizes the same between countries??
The tweeter I have is rather sensitive, I do recall that from my measurements. will browse a bit more in the link you gace, maybe even do a comparative frequency sweep to see if that helps nail it down.
as I say, a bit academic as I am using it anyway but it would be good to nail it down just for 'reference' sake.
BTW, the back bit is not plastic (if that is important), I just assumed it was a shield, yet it is quite magnetic
EDIT had a quick browse thru your link, it certainly seems quite close doesn't it. Wonder why it has a deeper profile??
thanks for your help, unless something more definitive comes up it does look like it.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.