Camera sales have fallen

I had both, but much preferred the mechanical MX

ME was an excellent camera, of course, but its light meter and I didn´t agree on what was important in the scene 🙂

Not "cheating" at all, simply "somebody else is deciding for you"

Great on daylight pictures, specially outdoors, when you have that powerful "lamp" in the sky evenly illuminating everything, specially on slightly overcast days, but I love available light or night photography, where illumination is VERY uneven, and by definition unadjustable, so you must carefully measure the main subject and let everything else fall where it can.

Film range is so limited compared to human eye, that what you can see in the original scene is hardly what you´ll find in the final copy, so choose wisely.
The K and M series Pentax cameras were good, but then they lost their way. Their real gems though were their M42 (screw thread) lenses. Very good optics, good coatings, incredible mechanisms as in the focusing. I have most of the commonly used ones and they work surprisingly well on a Canon T-90.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
There are iPhone stedicam rigs, special lens, a whole growing support ecosystem is growing.
That's the kind of thing I was thinking about. Things like steadicams or rails with motors could be interesting low-cost and small DIY Projects since the camera itself is very small.

But the camera is so small a stabilized drone can replace whole swaths of the kit used to do the same thing with the likes of ARRI or Panaflex
That's a good technique too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
BTW with the small Powershot-style Canon I have and which I love, I noticed something one Christmas. My wife usually sets a red Christmas-themed table napkin on the dinner table for the holidays.

No matter how I try - be it with changing Settings, lighting - I can never get this Canon to capture the real shade of red of this napkin.

Either I'm a goof, or else the sensor itself has an issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
Zorki started as a Leica copy, but the later models were much improved.
The fake Leicas made from old Zorki and Fed have several web sites about them. Most are obvious fakes, like the fake Luger pistols. A small industry in former USSR, it is years since I checked those out.

A great uncle has a kit, I have to collect it from him in Bombay, short, regular and telephoto lenses.
He says all you need to fix it is a Swiss Amy knife, very simple and rugged.

He was a ship's engineer, it has traveled a lot with him, the Pyramids in Egypt, Eiffel Tower, London Bridge etc.
And it was on a ship for several years, no corrosion issues.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey
I was heavy into landscape photography in grad school. I shot everything from 35 mm to 4x6 (inch) sheet film. Shot lots of Fuji Velvia. I joined the digital revolution around 2006 and sold my film gear. The only camera I miss is the Hasselblad 501CM. That was a real camera.

It's no surprise that the pocket cameras have gone away. Most of us now have a far better camera in our phones.

Tom
 
That's the kind of thing I was thinking about. Things like steadicams or rails with motors could be interesting low-cost and small DIY Projects since the camera itself is very small.
DJI, the drone maker has a camera stabilizer made for smartphones. I have the older OSMO Mobile 3 and it does a good job of removing my hand shake, but it can't compensate for the inevitable slight dip when walking while close to the target you are photographing. The newer OSMO Mobile units use feedback from the phone via Bluetooth for better stabilization. Unfortunately they are now limited to a small list of specific phones and there are no Motorola phones on the list. Most iPhones from the X on are on the list and I do have an XS. I don't need a stabilizer at the moment, so I'll stick with my OSMO Mobile 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YashN and Pano
BTW with the small Powershot-style Canon I have and which I love, I noticed something one Christmas. My wife usually sets a red Christmas-themed table napkin on the dinner table for the holidays.

No matter how I try - be it with changing Settings, lighting - I can never get this Canon to capture the real shade of red of this napkin.

Either I'm a goof, or else the sensor itself has an issue.
It´s a sensor problem.

Early ones were unduly sensitive to infrared, even today I use a camera or phone to check remote controls functionality.

So they either see something you don´t, and it will probably impact in the Red tuned sensors, or they add an IR filter, which again will affect Red; I guess you are stuck to correcting hue in post-processing to desired or perceive colour.
 
My phone definitely picks up frequencies the eye does not see. My glass artist buddy put a dozen LEDs in this lamp, my eye it is really wimpy but to the camera:

4B1334A6-16C0-43DC-AB07-27769ADC536D.jpeg


dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey