Calling all clever people :) What do you make of this?

Status
Not open for further replies.
hmmmmmm I'm sure my gf would be pleased it you did 😉 and maybe I would actually get all the things on my to do list done, and then get so bored I'd go out and find a job....

hmmmm I think I need to work on my priorities!! thanks for the wakeup call Vikash 😉

Tony.
 
Okay guys, my daughter has something to say

Greetings Earthlings!
yes the moment you've all been waiting for... the spawn of anatech has arrived!

at any rate... i've read this thread and am greatly amused.

here's my two cents on the question of whether this airplane can take off or not.

yes; so long as there is a pressure difference created on either side of the airfoils negative to the top. lift is created by this difference and the flow of air over said airfoil. the wheels are not important to the forward mortion so long as they are free to rotate.

we discussed this same question in ground school. my flying instructor found it amusing too.

for complete details i would refere you to the textbook
From the Ground Up. it's an excellent source of information for anyone interested in learning about flight and parts of an aircraft. i've read the book cover to cover a couple times myself.

-Samantha
 
To those they think they have the answer to the original question

It seems there is a consensus amongst some that the plane will take off but the wheels will be moving at twice the normal speed. How does one reconcile this with the original stipulation that the speed of the wheels must equal the speed of the belt which you are saying is not going to be the case? I agree that it is the question that is flawed but it is also this flawed question that we are bound by when answering.
 
Hi Cal,
Sorry, no pants.

Work sent her to Texas. Seems she always has her ducks in a row (your's also Al). She works for Snap-On, so she was sent to head office. Someone's tail feathers are goning to be burnt (not hers).

-Chris
 
AudioFreak said:
I agree with that too but it still can be taken as breaking the rules set down by the original question. The belt must at all times match the wheel speed but in the opposite direction.

hehehe don't you love interpretation Chris's works if you take the reference point as being on the belt beside the wheel, in this reference point you, the belt and the wheel are all stationary and it is the outside world that is moving so no rules are broken because the speed of the wheel = the speed of the belt = 0 and the plane takes off without breaking any of the rules of the question.

edit: the important point here is that the question didn't define the point of reference 🙂

Tony.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.