As ZM suggests, go for BL here.
Note:
The grades here are not a tolerance range but rather a range of Idss values. Idss is the drain current when the gate voltage is zero with respect to the source, i.e. both grounded.
Note:
The grades here are not a tolerance range but rather a range of Idss values. Idss is the drain current when the gate voltage is zero with respect to the source, i.e. both grounded.
Last edited:
Thanks Zen. What is BL and why is V grade sissy?
You are talking to an ignoramus.
Chris
re-read my answer 😉
strong BL can be same (regarding Ids) as sissy V
re-read my answer 😉
strong BL can be same (regarding Ids) as sissy V
I'm going to get some reading glasses instead.
After a longer hearing I can say the BA-3 frontend with crippled F4 has a clearness and a articulation I first heard in a similar way with F1J......
it is not a sweet sound ....
But I still can try P3.....forth and back.....
- end or comments- 😀
it is not a sweet sound ....
But I still can try P3.....forth and back.....
- end or comments- 😀
Do my eyes deceive me (steady boy you're in uncharted waters here thinking for yourself) am I missing an input or is this a single ended design.
Chris
Chris
Last edited:
But I still can try P3.....forth and back.....
- end or comments- 😀
Hypnotic!
Sweet compared to.....?
This remark is very intriguing, well worth a try, imho only doable if you have a distortion meter:
albertAdjustment of P3 will bring the second harmonic out, and as you turn the wiper toward the Source of Q1 you favor the positive going waveform. When you turn the wiper toward the Source of Q2 you favor the negative going waveform. Favoring the positive going waveform is possibly preferred – with proper speaker polarity, this mimics the acoustic character of air.
After a longer hearing I can say the BA-3 frontend with crippled F4 has a clearness and a articulation I first heard in a similar way with F1J......
it is not a sweet sound ....
But I still can try P3.....forth and back.....
- end or comments- 😀
What caps are you using generg?
Chris
Oh, at the moment I use simply 1uF Silmic II, I measured the voltage over the cap and it was about 6V, so I thought enough to keep the Silmic working.....
Later I will try others....
this morning I had first time in my diy career the beginning of an ugly noise over the speaker in one channel of BA-3 and crippled F4.....
I must search what happened.........
I had to much euphoria with my quick built .....
better buy the boards......point to point is even more reliable because you are fully concentrated, so you think board will do everything....only some small changes....and you do not see other "small changes"
he,he,he😀😀😀
Later I will try others....
this morning I had first time in my diy career the beginning of an ugly noise over the speaker in one channel of BA-3 and crippled F4.....
I must search what happened.........
I had to much euphoria with my quick built .....
better buy the boards......point to point is even more reliable because you are fully concentrated, so you think board will do everything....only some small changes....and you do not see other "small changes"
he,he,he😀😀😀
Papa writes:

R8/R9 in the diagram are for (V)HF stabilisation.
albert
and further down:R8 and R9 help set the voltage gain, and they also help stabilize the bias of Q3 and Q4, else it would tend to drift upwards as the parts warm up.
achieve the correct bias voltages across R8 and R9 (about 1 volt)
I think he means R10, R11you can experiment with higher bias, remembering that the parts are rated at 25 watts, and that it costs you voltage losses across R8 and R9. If you want to play with even higher bias, you can consider lowering the values of R8 and R9 and also R13, all in proportion.

R8/R9 in the diagram are for (V)HF stabilisation.
albert
Last edited:
Zen also mentioned on the question of tea-bag that R10 and R11 can influence the amplification...
and I think in the text P1 and P2 are also mixed up......., possible?
and I think in the text P1 and P2 are also mixed up......., possible?
Oh, at the moment I use simply 1uF Silmic II, I measured the voltage over the cap and it was about 6V, so I thought enough to keep the Silmic working.....
Later I will try others....
this morning I had first time in my diy career the beginning of an ugly noise over the speaker in one channel of BA-3 and crippled F4.....
Hi generg,
Did you mean 10uF?
From Nelson's earlier post:
It sounds really good.
especially if you use the parts specified.
I've just seen some 100V 'Amtrans' polypropylene caps which are about £4 each. Good price but do you think we could get away with 8200pF for C3 or three 3300pF? I don't know how they sound.
Chris
Chris
crackling in one channel is away,🙂
for "research purposes" I had cranked up the bias to 2V over R10 and R11 and there was a carbon resistor R10 with 22 Ohm and I forgot to get the bias back, and one Piazolla cd later he had 33 Ohm...... and was depressive.....and moaning through the speakers..... 😉
changed him against a maniac Dale...
.
for "research purposes" I had cranked up the bias to 2V over R10 and R11 and there was a carbon resistor R10 with 22 Ohm and I forgot to get the bias back, and one Piazolla cd later he had 33 Ohm...... and was depressive.....and moaning through the speakers..... 😉
changed him against a maniac Dale...

- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Burning Amp BA-3