"Make me an offer on the BGW"
I'll give you 100.00 U.S. apiece.... you pay the shipping to me in Utah...... They make great foundations on which to build a Class A power amp.
Mark
I'll give you 100.00 U.S. apiece.... you pay the shipping to me in Utah...... They make great foundations on which to build a Class A power amp.
Mark
Andreas
BGW750 (C) is full complementary. Possibly yours aren't working properly?
Mind you, there are better sounding amps today but they certainly weren't a bad amplifier.
-Chris
BGW750 (C) is full complementary. Possibly yours aren't working properly?
Mind you, there are better sounding amps today but they certainly weren't a bad amplifier.
-Chris
"I made a find today- a 1500va plitron torroid dual c.t. secondarys
$25! coooool"
Thats funny, I also found one of those trannys at that same surplus store........ Did you take yours back?
Mark
$25! coooool"
Thats funny, I also found one of those trannys at that same surplus store........ Did you take yours back?
Mark
I have (15) BGW 750. They all work perfect except for 2. Hence, that is why I asked about the transistors. I have bridged these amps, and pushed them to THE ABSOLUTE MAX that I could safely without abuse. In all this time, only one took a **** on me and that is why I am doing some module work right now. The other one I picked up broke in order to both learn, and repair it at the same time. I may not be as experienced as the rest of you guys, but the BGW's are in my opinion some of the best sounding solid-state amps ever made. Remarkable that even today most 750 B & C models are 20-25 years old and are still cranked to the max daily. (750 A is a little older -introduced in '74). Djk, would you be willing to sell me some of the MJ15024/25 's? I am going to try this one module first and see how it comes out.
I have just become the proud owner of a BGW750C!
However 1 xchannell is not working 4 output devices blown
Does any one have or could guide me to a shematic so that I can repair my amplifier.
regards trev
However 1 xchannell is not working 4 output devices blown
Does any one have or could guide me to a shematic so that I can repair my amplifier.
regards trev
Hi djsynthesize,
That and something new for the LM318 may make a wonderful change.
-Chris
Those are still current numbers, but why not try MJ21195G and MJ21196G? That is the latest and greatest with a higher SOA.Djk, would you be willing to sell me some of the MJ15024/25 's?
That and something new for the LM318 may make a wonderful change.
-Chris
Since you're in GB, I would order the MJ21195/96 from Digi-Key. They have them in stock in one lot quantity for $3.78 each.
I'd leave the LM318 alone, it's not that bad. The input coupling cap, feedback cap, and the pair of level shift caps are what holds the sound back. Add a pair of 47µF 100V power supply bypass caps across the main filter caps.
Don't mix output transistor types, replace all in a channel. If you want good reliability, do both channels.
I'd leave the LM318 alone, it's not that bad. The input coupling cap, feedback cap, and the pair of level shift caps are what holds the sound back. Add a pair of 47µF 100V power supply bypass caps across the main filter caps.
Don't mix output transistor types, replace all in a channel. If you want good reliability, do both channels.
That is so important, and yet I see techs mix them all the time. Strip and clean the heatsink, wash with clean water after the chemicals.Don't mix output transistor types, replace all in a channel.
-Chris
Thanks lads for the information !
However do any of you have the schematic so that I can see whats going on in the amp.As a student and owner of many amplifiers I always like to know what is going on
Regards Trev
However do any of you have the schematic so that I can see whats going on in the amp.As a student and owner of many amplifiers I always like to know what is going on
Regards Trev
You can draw your own schematic out.
Opamp runs on ±15V derived from zeners off the main rails.
The output of the opamp goes through a series pair of resistors to the positive rail, and a series pair of resistors to the negative rail.
The Vas pair are driven by these resistor pairs, and the resistors connected to the opamp output are bypassed with a largish electrolytic.
Vbe multiplier between the Vas pair.
Tripple EF output stage.
Power supply, relay driver, and crowbar.
Fini.
Opamp runs on ±15V derived from zeners off the main rails.
The output of the opamp goes through a series pair of resistors to the positive rail, and a series pair of resistors to the negative rail.
The Vas pair are driven by these resistor pairs, and the resistors connected to the opamp output are bypassed with a largish electrolytic.
Vbe multiplier between the Vas pair.
Tripple EF output stage.
Power supply, relay driver, and crowbar.
Fini.
Yes I have got that far but i am interested re the protection circuits
Also there are some transistors that I have not figured out yet !
I can understand the basic output stage all seems simple enough its just there seems to be so much of it.
thanks foe your reply
regards trev
Also there are some transistors that I have not figured out yet !
I can understand the basic output stage all seems simple enough its just there seems to be so much of it.
thanks foe your reply
regards trev
I have gone further into my amp and though the output section is now ok it has a high dc offset.
I suspect the lm318 opamp!
Can any one suggest a replacement for this as it is now discontinued !!!
Or a source of supply in the UK
best regards Trev
I suspect the lm318 opamp!
Can any one suggest a replacement for this as it is now discontinued !!!
Or a source of supply in the UK
best regards Trev
The cap in the feedback loop is always damaged whenever you lose an output device. When the cap is bad you will have high off-set.
NTE has a sub for it the NTE918M. Its is probably just a re-labeled LM318 op amp. Just look it up to be sure its the metal can variety which is what you will need for the BGW. NTE has alot of antique replacement parts. I bought an ua709 NTE sub today for a Wavetek Function generator that was made in 1969! Works perfectly.
Mark
Mark
So far the only LM318 I can obtain is the 8 pin dil version and not the To39 can
Is there a problem using this ?
Does any one have a metal can unit they are willing to sell /supply
I will try and contact NTE but trust me its a bank holiday here in the UK
I must say the construction of the BGW is a bit of a suprise with all the components being mounted on the track side its a bit like the old blob boards I used years ago! Its as if the components were thrown at the board does any one have thoughts re the construction
regards Trev
Is there a problem using this ?
Does any one have a metal can unit they are willing to sell /supply
I will try and contact NTE but trust me its a bank holiday here in the UK
I must say the construction of the BGW is a bit of a suprise with all the components being mounted on the track side its a bit like the old blob boards I used years ago! Its as if the components were thrown at the board does any one have thoughts re the construction
regards Trev
Hi Trev,
Don't change the op amp yet. There is a procedure for balancing the driver currents as you monitor the DC offset of the 318. I'll bet you have not done that. If I only still had my manuals!!!!
On the board near the MJE devices you will see resistors with pads (or resistors) beside them. One adjusts bias current, the other two set the currents in the drivers. The spare resistor pads the value of the main one. Start by removing the pad and see if the offset gets worse, or better. Now you know which way to go. Make sure you aren't playing with the bias current! Adjust until the offset on pin 6 is below 100mV (as I recall).
I have never seen the op amp bad on these. I have seen an op amp supply capacitor short and create offset that way.
-Chris
Edit: Mark, I try to avoid NTE / ECG garbage unless there is no other way. That stuff is expensive trash.
Don't change the op amp yet. There is a procedure for balancing the driver currents as you monitor the DC offset of the 318. I'll bet you have not done that. If I only still had my manuals!!!!
On the board near the MJE devices you will see resistors with pads (or resistors) beside them. One adjusts bias current, the other two set the currents in the drivers. The spare resistor pads the value of the main one. Start by removing the pad and see if the offset gets worse, or better. Now you know which way to go. Make sure you aren't playing with the bias current! Adjust until the offset on pin 6 is below 100mV (as I recall).
I have never seen the op amp bad on these. I have seen an op amp supply capacitor short and create offset that way.
-Chris
Edit: Mark, I try to avoid NTE / ECG garbage unless there is no other way. That stuff is expensive trash.
Thanks lads i will look at that later this weekend as soon as I finish the house chores
Regards Trevor
Regards Trevor
I have replaced the lm318 with a plastic cased version
offset now down to 0.8 mv all seems fine.
Output transistors have been replaced with mj 15024/25 devices and that seems to be ok also.
The opamp rails were measured at 10 volts each not 15 as earlier stated !!!
The amp is rather primative with its ab-b output stage and I wonder what the transfer function would look like!
Seems to me it one of those high feedback designs that relies on its feed back to obtain any thing like a reasonable performance rather than being a highly linear design.
Allthough i do like the method of obtaining a symetrical VAS stage
Thanks for your help etc
regards Trev
offset now down to 0.8 mv all seems fine.
Output transistors have been replaced with mj 15024/25 devices and that seems to be ok also.
The opamp rails were measured at 10 volts each not 15 as earlier stated !!!
The amp is rather primative with its ab-b output stage and I wonder what the transfer function would look like!
Seems to me it one of those high feedback designs that relies on its feed back to obtain any thing like a reasonable performance rather than being a highly linear design.
Allthough i do like the method of obtaining a symetrical VAS stage
Thanks for your help etc
regards Trev
Symmetry in BW750.
If something looks symmetrical it sure looks symmetrical, but on the other hand is it symmetrial? Are the electrons moving about in the cirquits experiating a symmetrical environment. Since electron mobility is differing a factor of 3 in N resp P doped Si, the symmetry is apparent and only on the schematic. To get symmetry in true sence is to use class A.
Andreas
BTW BGW750 is the worst sounding power amp I've heard to date.
If something looks symmetrical it sure looks symmetrical, but on the other hand is it symmetrial? Are the electrons moving about in the cirquits experiating a symmetrical environment. Since electron mobility is differing a factor of 3 in N resp P doped Si, the symmetry is apparent and only on the schematic. To get symmetry in true sence is to use class A.
Andreas
BTW BGW750 is the worst sounding power amp I've heard to date.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- BGW 750B output modules