Edge diffraction cannot be attenuated via DSP because the data is always windowed somehow using psychoacoustic functions that I'm not aware so far. Correct me if I am wrong. Bipolar infinite baffle is elegant diffraction free design and allow phantom images to convolute with direct sound although the quality is not known for me.
MSW and Jordans, they both have similar time transmittances but they do sound different (not mine). I'm little confused we cannot explain the benefits or differences between this masterpiece designs. MSW addressing spring-mass effects and we should see something.
Backing to the subject. I'm not sure if 180 deg flat dispersion is not a fashion or creating an artificial effect. Audiophiles loves that kind of distortions but maybe this is a conventional wisdom thinking. I have two names in my mind - Dr. Earl Geddes and Mr. Moulton.
MSW and Jordans, they both have similar time transmittances but they do sound different (not mine). I'm little confused we cannot explain the benefits or differences between this masterpiece designs. MSW addressing spring-mass effects and we should see something.
Backing to the subject. I'm not sure if 180 deg flat dispersion is not a fashion or creating an artificial effect. Audiophiles loves that kind of distortions but maybe this is a conventional wisdom thinking. I have two names in my mind - Dr. Earl Geddes and Mr. Moulton.
If we think of edge diffraction as an "added" signal, which is contineously added to the music, we can subtract it first so that it is added back, however, some tests would help verify this.
Mangers has that thin diaphram that actually has it's own vribration modes. With these vribration modes, the actual wave would be like multiple rings of waves. The Jordans actually try to minize the flexure of the diaphram just enough so that there is a grasual increase in effective mass as the frequency decreases, so these are based on two different methods.
In order to know whether 180 degree dispersion is good or not, one needs to look into the change in time and intensity at various frequencies to see whether they are consistent with each other or not. I think 180 degrees is the way to go in a limited space. Bipolar is best in a very large room, and not really practical in smaller home environment in my opinion.
Mangers has that thin diaphram that actually has it's own vribration modes. With these vribration modes, the actual wave would be like multiple rings of waves. The Jordans actually try to minize the flexure of the diaphram just enough so that there is a grasual increase in effective mass as the frequency decreases, so these are based on two different methods.
In order to know whether 180 degree dispersion is good or not, one needs to look into the change in time and intensity at various frequencies to see whether they are consistent with each other or not. I think 180 degrees is the way to go in a limited space. Bipolar is best in a very large room, and not really practical in smaller home environment in my opinion.
im aware of the way bipolar speakers sound in small rooms, however, our main room is 25 by 30 by (8- 12) so its no worry.
as ive mentioned before, im doing this, for the hell of it. this has nothing to do with DSP, frequency response, etc. that means little or nothing to me.
MY ONLY QUESTION IS THE DRIVER SELECTION (3WAY) AND A CROSSOVER.
ID APPRECIATE IF YOU ANSWERED TE ABOVE
ill be using eaither a 4 inch titanium or bamboo driver from tang-bang.
as ive mentioned before, im doing this, for the hell of it. this has nothing to do with DSP, frequency response, etc. that means little or nothing to me.
MY ONLY QUESTION IS THE DRIVER SELECTION (3WAY) AND A CROSSOVER.
ID APPRECIATE IF YOU ANSWERED TE ABOVE

ill be using eaither a 4 inch titanium or bamboo driver from tang-bang.
legendaryfrog said:im aware of the way bipolar speakers sound in small rooms, however, our main room is 25 by 30 by (8- 12) so its no worry.
as ive mentioned before, im doing this, for the hell of it. this has nothing to do with DSP, frequency response, etc. that means little or nothing to me.
MY ONLY QUESTION IS THE DRIVER SELECTION (3WAY) AND A CROSSOVER.
ID APPRECIATE IF YOU ANSWERED TE ABOVE
ill be using eaither a 4 inch titanium or bamboo driver from tang-bang.
I though you already decided on a 3" driver, had that changed or is ti a typo? I also though you were going to do it for your bedroom, has it changed to the main bedroom? If you are just doing it for the hell of it, just take your pick. Really no need for recommendation here.
Yeah, if you don't care how it sounds then just pick some drivers and build something. That bamboo cone tang band is supposed to sound quite nice.
Good luck!
Good luck!
im sorry if i mislead you in any way. i've been frequently changing stuff, etc. the 4 inch TB was a typo it is meant to be 3 inch.
note: my first beolab will be for my bedroom. i have the case finished except for the back panel. when i get the 2 TB bamboos, Ill hook it up, wait for the t-amp to be in stock again, buy it, then hook it up and enjoy. 🙂🙂
note: my first beolab will be for my bedroom. i have the case finished except for the back panel. when i get the 2 TB bamboos, Ill hook it up, wait for the t-amp to be in stock again, buy it, then hook it up and enjoy. 🙂🙂
legendaryfrog said:im sorry if i mislead you in any way. i've been frequently changing stuff, etc. the 4 inch TB was a typo it is meant to be 3 inch.
note: my first beolab will be for my bedroom. i have the case finished except for the back panel. when i get the 2 TB bamboos, Ill hook it up, wait for the t-amp to be in stock again, buy it, then hook it up and enjoy. 🙂🙂
Are you sure TB has 3 inch bamboos? which model is it? How are the UFOs? The BeoLab has a round cylindrical-like enclosure, how are you doing it like that?
yep im sure TB has 3inch bamboos. i dont know the model. the UFo's are great, shiny, with minor ridges. the cylinders will be that black PVC.
The vifa 3" dome, around $49
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=264-550
The PE 2" dome, around $28
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=285-020
The PE neo tweeter, around $5
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=275-030
Would you consider the 2" dome and neo tweet?
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=264-550
The PE 2" dome, around $28
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=285-020
The PE neo tweeter, around $5
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=275-030
Would you consider the 2" dome and neo tweet?
Hi legendaryfog,
Just wanted to offer words of encouragement for your project. Just have a go and see what you can create. Even if your intial creation is just a result of experimentation, your knowledge and ability to tweak the design will increase as you work on it, and eventually you could end up with a fantastic speaker. It doesn't matter if you have never designed a speaker before.
Andrew.
Just wanted to offer words of encouragement for your project. Just have a go and see what you can create. Even if your intial creation is just a result of experimentation, your knowledge and ability to tweak the design will increase as you work on it, and eventually you could end up with a fantastic speaker. It doesn't matter if you have never designed a speaker before.
Andrew.
Well ?
Did you succeed ?
I just came across the design today,
and was thinking "i can do that".
a quick search and here you are,
someone thought of this before....
How are your results ?
Cheers!
empee
Did you succeed ?
I just came across the design today,
and was thinking "i can do that".
a quick search and here you are,
someone thought of this before....
How are your results ?
Cheers!
empee
Does anyone know how Sausolito/B&O derived the dimensions for the two accoustic lenses used in the Beolab 5? It was not clear to me from scanning the patents.
This was my take on it, if you draw the reflection and difrraction waves, there are too many issues that complicate things to the point that it will probably never be qualified as Hi Fi.
Augene - Hear the real thing!: Distortion in a Loudspeaker III
Augene - Hear the real thing!: Distortion in a Loudspeaker III
Has anyone considered having these acoustic lens printed by a Shapeworks or a similar 3d printing company?
An earlier comment said finding a 3" dome is hard. This Tangbrand unit measures well and can go very low in frequency for a dome:
Tangband 75-1558SE
Zaph|Audio
Tangband 75-1558SE
Zaph|Audio
Does anyone know how Sausolito/B&O derived the dimensions for the two accoustic lenses used in the Beolab 5? It was not clear to me from scanning the patents.

Everything that you need to make one of the lenses is here:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/209799-sunshine.html
This was my take on it, if you draw the reflection and difrraction waves, there are too many issues that complicate things to the point that it will probably never be qualified as Hi Fi.
Augene - Hear the real thing!: Distortion in a Loudspeaker III

The rounded edges on the lens reduce diffraction.
My reference speakers (Gedlee Summas) have a lot of features designed to reduce diffraction. I've heard the Beolab 5, and although they sound very different than my reference, they are very good and very competitive
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Beolab 5 clones!!!!!