By accident I discover on the web this 3-pulley belt drive turntable - a good approach to avoid a general disadvantage of belt drive turntables:
Funk Vector Link Turntable:
https://www.enjoythemusic.com/superioraudio/equipment/0808/funk_vector_link.htm
under
https://web.archive.org/web/20080216232158/http://www.thefunkfirm.co.uk/V_Link.htm
I read this:
The VECTOR is the ultimate solution to the problem of motor pull. It is a 3-pullley drive system that is fed by an ironless rotor (low mass to you and me) DC motor that is mounted on the sub-chassis with the belt tension force then distributed about the sub-platter via 2 passively driven slave pulleys. These patented innovations are unique to Funk.
A similar approach was realized by an other brand which I have seen several years ago (maybe VPI industries - but I am not sure) - but the slave pulleys at this belt drive device are located outside from the platter.
check out more images (Linn SONDEK LP-12 mod to a 3-pulley drive system) in post 160 under
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/linn-sondek-diy-mods-that-work.272570/page-8
more URLs:
https://www.hifinext.com/acoustic-signature-unveils-new-generation-of-neo-turntables/
https://www.stereophile.com/content/acoustic-signature-montana-neo-turntable
https://www.acoustic-signature.com/products/turntables/invictus-neo/
Thank you for calling more turntable brands/models with a three pulley belt drive system.
P.S.: from this approaches I'm less convinced because the pulleys aren't surrounded (distributed around the platter):
https://www.music-hall-shop.de/produkt/music-hall-mmf-11-3-plattenspieler/
https://www.stereophile.com/content...venger-reference-turntable-vpi-fatboy-tonearm
https://www.stereophile.com/content...n-acoustics-codia-acoustic-design-stein-music (fourth picture)
https://www.analogplanet.com/content/tw-acustic-introduces-triple-motor-module-raven-ac-turntable
https://www.pressreader.com/germany/stereoplay/20191004/281651076833538
even not from this approach:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/idler-wheel-magic.214019/
Funk Vector Link Turntable:
https://www.enjoythemusic.com/superioraudio/equipment/0808/funk_vector_link.htm
under
https://web.archive.org/web/20080216232158/http://www.thefunkfirm.co.uk/V_Link.htm
I read this:
The VECTOR is the ultimate solution to the problem of motor pull. It is a 3-pullley drive system that is fed by an ironless rotor (low mass to you and me) DC motor that is mounted on the sub-chassis with the belt tension force then distributed about the sub-platter via 2 passively driven slave pulleys. These patented innovations are unique to Funk.
A similar approach was realized by an other brand which I have seen several years ago (maybe VPI industries - but I am not sure) - but the slave pulleys at this belt drive device are located outside from the platter.
check out more images (Linn SONDEK LP-12 mod to a 3-pulley drive system) in post 160 under
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/linn-sondek-diy-mods-that-work.272570/page-8
more URLs:
https://www.hifinext.com/acoustic-signature-unveils-new-generation-of-neo-turntables/
https://www.stereophile.com/content/acoustic-signature-montana-neo-turntable
https://www.acoustic-signature.com/products/turntables/invictus-neo/
Thank you for calling more turntable brands/models with a three pulley belt drive system.
P.S.: from this approaches I'm less convinced because the pulleys aren't surrounded (distributed around the platter):
https://www.music-hall-shop.de/produkt/music-hall-mmf-11-3-plattenspieler/
https://www.stereophile.com/content...venger-reference-turntable-vpi-fatboy-tonearm
https://www.stereophile.com/content...n-acoustics-codia-acoustic-design-stein-music (fourth picture)
https://www.analogplanet.com/content/tw-acustic-introduces-triple-motor-module-raven-ac-turntable
https://www.pressreader.com/germany/stereoplay/20191004/281651076833538
even not from this approach:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/idler-wheel-magic.214019/
Attachments
Hi, It's all about trying to overcome the stretch and slack of of the belt system. So here it will happen 3 times, but to a much lesser exstent than on a conventual system.
I prefer using a known none or shall we say greatly reduced belt stretch of Mylar tape to drive the outer perimeter of my T/T. There are many means to an end.
Cheers
I prefer using a known none or shall we say greatly reduced belt stretch of Mylar tape to drive the outer perimeter of my T/T. There are many means to an end.
Cheers
check out post #161+162 under
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/linn-sondek-diy-mods-that-work.272570/page-9
for an diy example of this approach
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/linn-sondek-diy-mods-that-work.272570/page-9
for an diy example of this approach
Because most belt drive work only with one motorpulley and rubber belts for me the most important question is as follow:Hi, It's all about trying to overcome the stretch and slack of of the belt system. So here it will happen 3 times, but to a much lesser exstent than on a conventual system.
I prefer using a known none or shall we say greatly reduced belt stretch of Mylar tape to drive the outer perimeter of my T/T. There are many means to an end.
Cheers
What is the correct value for the pretensioning force resp. stretch factor of belts of various compliances (right contact pressure on motor pulley and platter)?
check out this thread:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...-belt-drive-turntable-and-replacement.390372/