Basic stuffing question

Not at all. How is related to frequency response? What have in common damping factor and rolling off frequency response to the right, please ? At mid/hight and high frequencies the speaker is not as much dependent by the box as I know. What parameter in stuffing box economy should be applied to predict the response in hights once a well determined quantity of a well known stuffing material is used ?

Dear Madam,
what if I replaced the vague word "damping " with "acoustic attenuation". Attenuation of sound wave (amplitude, velocity) increases with increasing wave frequency and propagation distance. This is generally true for waves of any wavelength and any medium, including the interstellar medium (vacuum).
 
It does. It removes all (or hopefully most of it) the time-delayed hash coming back thru the cone. Will reduce the comb filtering caused by the primary differences. Smoother with less non-wanted reflection artifacts is often perveived as having “less there”.

dave
 
I'll come back to whether or not a bass guitar cab needs stuffing!

There's no 'correct' sound for an electric bass, it's simply a matter of personal choice.

Some players prefer the sound with a full absorbent fill, others with no fill at all and others with absorbent on the cabinet walls only.

Also, I don't think that the resonance peak of 50 ohms is problematical. Such impedance variations are part and parcel of the overall cabinet response.