Balance Potentiometer with only 135° usable Angle of Rotation - what Benefit?

By checking an integrated amplifier (Harman HK-610) I note crackling by rotation of the balance knob (usual on old amplifier stuff).

Upon closer inspection it turned out that this contact problems on this stereo potentiometer occurs only close to the center position.
It's about this part of Alps according SM: VR-501/502: Part-No 5113-S2005104, 100KΩ

After desolder and dismantling this part (because I assumed an internal deficiency due oxidation etc.),
I measure zero ohms from center tap to left and 100KΩ from center tap to right on slider track of first channel and the same, but vise versa on the second channel.
Thus only 135° usable angle of rotation is available.

On the first both attached jpg files the difference between one half of slider track surface and the other can also be seen visually.
I've never seen before this kind of slider track in balance pots - but it seems to have been widespread.

What is the correct naming of such potentiometers (without keyword I can't find information by google) ?
What benefits are to expect by using such versions for balance control in opposite to usual versions ?
Are ALPS datasheets of such kind of potentiometers available ?

Thank you very much for comments.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF8760.JPG
    DSCF8760.JPG
    279.2 KB · Views: 199
  • DSCF8771.JPG
    DSCF8771.JPG
    437.7 KB · Views: 185
  • DSCF8769.JPG
    DSCF8769.JPG
    185.7 KB · Views: 165
  • DSCF8768.JPG
    DSCF8768.JPG
    150.5 KB · Views: 171
  • DSCF8767.JPG
    DSCF8767.JPG
    183.5 KB · Views: 178
  • DSCF8765.JPG
    DSCF8765.JPG
    298.6 KB · Views: 151
  • DSCF8761.JPG
    DSCF8761.JPG
    289.5 KB · Views: 205
Last edited:
Due age of balance pots with MN taper there are more interrupts than with usual tapers (even after cleaning and remove oxidation) because In the center position a MN taper balance control is just wire.
So I can't find any particular advantages at first in favor of the MN taper. Under
https://sound-au.com/pots.htm
MN tapers aren't mentioned.

several details to MN and other different tapers:
https://web.archive.org/web/2020020...s.com/cd_catalog/new_catalogs/Pots/tapers.htm
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/beginners/mn-taper-poteniometer/
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/balance-pot-wiring.400219/ (post #19)
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/relative-impedance-of-balance-pot-to-volume-pot.294453/ (post #6)

P.S.: currently ALPS don't offer potentiometers with MN taper - go to
https://tech.alpsalpine.com/e/products/category/potentiometer/sub/01/series/rk163/
 

Attachments

Last edited:
This is probably made this way because...... When you regulate/attenuate one channel, you want the other to be unaffected by the rotation/keeping
the 100K constant and vice versa. You would otherwise keep raising the potmeters impedance on the opposite channel, to the one
you´re trying to attenuate. Not that uncommon to see this type of balance control 😉
 
https://sound-au.com/project01.htm

5 - Better Balance Control ..............
Para 2:

Bear in mind that many (especially early Japanese) designs use a specially designed pot for balance, and these are not suitable for the circuits shown below. These pots commonly have a centre detent, and the resistance of each track remains very low from the centre position to one end (or the other) of travel. These 'special' pots are characterised by the level remaining constant in one channel or the other as the balance pot is moved. The overall law of these controls is (IMO) unsatisfactory for hi-fi.