I'm on my way to design Unity horn for PA purposes (60x40, BMS 4550 and Faital 6FE200, covering from around 250 Hz, crossed about 1 kHz, DSP processed).
I came across a problem when simulating mids response in Hornresp: frequency response looks much worse when I use the second flare.
Here are my inputs and simulated frequency response with the second flare:
And here without the second flare:
Any idea why does it looks like that? I've read most of the threads about Unity/Synergy designs but never saw any report about that kind of problem.
I came across a problem when simulating mids response in Hornresp: frequency response looks much worse when I use the second flare.
Here are my inputs and simulated frequency response with the second flare:
And here without the second flare:
Any idea why does it looks like that? I've read most of the threads about Unity/Synergy designs but never saw any report about that kind of problem.
Glad you asked that !
Been having the same problem when adding the secondary flare.
Looking forward to the answer...
Been having the same problem when adding the secondary flare.
Looking forward to the answer...
You're right! I assumed, that leaving '1' in the second flare setting in SynergyCalc spreadsheet will just omit the flare, leaving the rest of horn unchanged.
That's great that I know the reason now, but how can I solve that? How can I calculate the proper depth, if I already have my coverage pattern set? Also, I have plenty of space in the rear of horn to use.
That's great that I know the reason now, but how can I solve that? How can I calculate the proper depth, if I already have my coverage pattern set? Also, I have plenty of space in the rear of horn to use.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.