They’re in excellent condition. Not close to the desired audio note sound.
What makes you consider them to be in excellent condition? Pretty much all speakers of that age will have drifted well out of spec due to crossover components changing value, ageing of driver suspension components, ageing of many forms of internal damping, etc... About 15 years ago I chucked my transmission line speakers from the 70s into a skip when moving home because they were well out of spec, it wasn't cost effective to refurbish them and there would be a small cost to transport them. Ebay has many top of the range speakers from 50 years ago selling for a nominal price that aren't worth the cost of refurbishing.
Refurbished speakers from 50 years can have the crossovers brought back into spec using current components but the drivers are more problematic because direct replacements are very rarely available and modern "equivalents" are usually quite a long way from being actual equivalents. If your speakers are refurbished do you have an idea of how competently it may have been done?
The sound quality from the regular an-e speakers to the Spe He signature or SPX he signature was a major jump. That is the sound I am after.
In that case it shouldn't be too difficult to identity from measurements and reproduce using cheap components for someone with a reasonable technical understanding. This doesn't happen much these days but shortly after the audiophile phenomenon kicked off in the late 70s it was not uncommon to reproduced the coloured sound of a very expensive boutique audiophile product using cheaper components. Here is a valve amplifier example from the mid 80s which, like all similar attempts, failed to find any customers. People that value valve amplifiers want the sound of a valve amplifier to come from a valve amplifier not a cheap bit of solid state electronics.
But then I figured, why not go after the field coil option for this cabinet design, since that is what I wanted anyway, and they also have a field coil option as their highest end speaker.
Field coils introducing some unknown/secret/unmeasureable/magic/... improvement to the sound of a speaker is an example of an audiophile marketing story. It can add real value to a very expensive boutique audiophile product for some nontechnical people that know it is true. They can sit down in front of such a product and enjoy the experience of listening to it significantly more than they would a speaker without field coils that radiates the same sound field. Sounding the same in a blind test and sounding the same in normal use is significantly different for those with audiophile beliefs and registerably different for those without.
I know that I have always preferred the sound of classic speakers like old Altec models. I think that I prefer a more gentle rolling off, but I am not sure if the Spx or spe signature does this.
Most speakers today are too bass heavy for my taste. I don’t like subwoofers. I don’t need to feel the bass in my chest, as people talk about. I don’t care about any of that. I just like a clean, tight sound, that is non-fatiguing, smooth, refined, balanced and detailed. I want a sound that I can listen to all day long. 24/7.
Audio Note speakers are quite strongly coloured and cannot reasonably be described by terms like clean, tight, balanced in comparison to speakers with a higher technical performance. Liking the sound and finding them non-fatiguing is reasonable and almost certainly more important in use. Most speakers have a reasonably flat low frequency response which creates significant room boom particularly if placed near corners. Audio Note speakers have a strongly falling bass response which lowers the level of the room boom though it will still be uneven and lumpy. In untreated rooms this can be less intrusive and a better compromise. If you want genuinely smooth tight bass in the home that is pretty much only attainable with the use of properly setup distributed subs for the lowest couple of octaves plus some room treatment and hopefully controlling the radiation pattern of the mains for the next few octaves until the room response ceases to dominate the perceived sound.
I agree. Unfortunately, I don’t know all of the technical aspects that factor into whether or not I like a speaker or not. I only know that I don’t care for many speakers considered high-end. I’ve heard them and they sound ok. They just don’t do it for me.
Speakers labelled high-end are normally significantly coloured like Audio Note speakers but in different ways leading to them sounding different. High technical performance is to be found in only a few expensive home audio speakers but can be found in midfield monitors from the main established studio monitor companies. If you want a subjective reference for sound quality this is a more reliable and consistent one although one still has to separate the room response from the speaker's.
I have always liked to listen at low volumes. I’ve measured and most of my listening does not go over 55db. For critical listening sessions, I might turn it up to the mid 70s db levels. But mostly I really enjoy listening at low volumes. I want a speaker that can retain its detail and character at lower volumes. I always found that higher sensitivity designs, older designs like Western Electric horns were suited to my taste. I don’t know why that is. It’s just a more present and realistic presentation, while being effortless and easy to listen to, while still retaining serious detail, as opposed to some other older models or retro which sound great and are non-fatiguing, but leave me wanting for more detail, especially in the highs.
People can neither perceive detail or tonal balance at lower volumes because of how we perceive sound. It's why amplifiers had loudness buttons to help correct for it before the audiophile phenomenon kicked off and marketing shifted reality for many nontechnical home audio enthusiasts. Room boom is less intrusive at lower volumes which is a plus.
Old horns tend to have a narrow radiation pattern, limited frequency passband and a ragged resonant response. It is a recognisable characteristic sound but not one many seek to reproduce in the home though there are a few enthusiasts.
I noticed the audio note speakers a few years back, but I thought they were grossly overpriced.
The high price is a requirement. They are a 50 year old budget speaker design and if they were priced and manufactured in volume to compete with modern budget speakers they would not be competive in terms of technical performance. Like many luxury goods offering a poor technical performance for the price they have to be marketing lead rather than engineering lead and to pitch the marketing at those that weight technical performance lightly or not at all. Doesn't make them a bad product just one with a limited appeal.
And then I heard the spx and I think the spe he and I knew that was a sound that I liked. Here is a link.
I just found this video a few minutes ago while searching for a different video. I don’t know what they’re doing in the design to make it sound this way. But I know that this is the sound I heard in person and this is a sound that I like. If you put on headphones and listen, perhaps you could describe what’s happening and how to achieve that sound.
This is not a binaural recording calibrated for my ears and headphones and so what is perceived will bear little-to-no resemblance to what would be perceived listening in that room.
When I was researching a few different speakers on google, this diy audio site kept popping up. So, despite my physical limitations, I thought I’d come on here and see if I could first figure out a design, and then find someone who could put it together.
There are a fair few similar designs around some of which could likely be adapted to reproduce quite closely the radiated sound of a particular Audio Note model. Employing professionals to research, design, manufacture, test and adjust such a clone would of course cost far more than buying a very expensive Audio Note speaker. It is also likely to be difficult to attract amateurs with the technical knowledge to accurately clone because they will see a low value 50 year old budget speaker design that has become obsolete due to technical advances. The only people that are likely to consider Audio Note speakers with features like hemp, silver wires, field coils, etc... to be high value are likely to have roughly the same level of technical knowledge as yourself.
Not sure what to suggest. Refurbishing your Snell's may or may not be worthwhile. Not sure you have a basis on which to choose between the various DIY designs with a similar configuration to the Audio Note speakers without hearing them. The parts to DIY Audio Note speakers are available. Price list here. So the price of a copy can be estimated but if you are not going to do the work yourself (and enjoy doing the work) then it is going to be expensive.
BTW this wretched cold seems to be easing off and so I won't be typing at such length in the near future.
BTW-2 Here is part of Audio Notes marketing story for field coils. Enjoy.
This was in a German DIY magazine. It's pretty much what you need for building a pair I think.
Thanks, can you check the magazine issue?
edit: There is a Seas Aphel kit offering, a decent product for a fraction of AN price tag.
That looks a lot like a better version of what Audio Note tries to do. Also not using the resistive vent of the Snell speakers, but a classic reflex like Audio Note. But it's done right as far as i can see on first sight. And it surely will sound a lot better than Audio Note if the measurements are right (With seas it's mostly very close in my experience). So it's a good candidate i think. I only would not use MDF but good quality birch or beach plywood (but the MDF will be good sounding also).edit: There is a Seas Aphel kit offering, a decent product for a fraction of AN price tag.
It has been a very long time since I have heard anyone mention that they listen at lower levels. That is a consideration to be taken differently as to what one would want out of a 'loudspeaker'. For most speakers, I find that I have attain a higher level than I like to listen in order to get them to play nice. In my case it is because of my hearing, and also because of it, I often find speakers to have too much bass. Yup, I can still hear bass very well, but the remainder of the audio spectrum is hampered.
I can see where the OP is coming from. What company was it in the past that offered 'soft speakers'? I guess that they didn't sell well.
I can see where the OP is coming from. What company was it in the past that offered 'soft speakers'? I guess that they didn't sell well.
Andy:
There are a fair few similar designs around some of which could likely be adapted to reproduce quite closely the radiated sound of a particular Audio Note model. Employing professionals to research, design, manufacture, test and adjust such a clone would of course cost far more than buying a very expensive Audio Note speaker. It is also likely to be difficult to attract amateurs with the technical knowledge to accurately clone because they will see a low value 50 year old budget speaker design that has become obsolete due to technical advances. The only people that are likely to consider Audio Note speakers with features like hemp, silver wires, field coils, etc... to be high value are likely to have roughly the same level of technical knowledge as yourself.
You’ve convinced me to abandon the project.
I was hoping to connect with someone here who might enjoy taking on a project like this or could point me in the direction of a skilled professional or amateur. It’s become clear that finding an enthusiastic and skilled individual here who might assist me with this endeavor is not a viable option. Without that possibility, I must accept that pursuing this project is beyond my physical capacity.
There are a fair few similar designs around some of which could likely be adapted to reproduce quite closely the radiated sound of a particular Audio Note model. Employing professionals to research, design, manufacture, test and adjust such a clone would of course cost far more than buying a very expensive Audio Note speaker. It is also likely to be difficult to attract amateurs with the technical knowledge to accurately clone because they will see a low value 50 year old budget speaker design that has become obsolete due to technical advances. The only people that are likely to consider Audio Note speakers with features like hemp, silver wires, field coils, etc... to be high value are likely to have roughly the same level of technical knowledge as yourself.
You’ve convinced me to abandon the project.
I was hoping to connect with someone here who might enjoy taking on a project like this or could point me in the direction of a skilled professional or amateur. It’s become clear that finding an enthusiastic and skilled individual here who might assist me with this endeavor is not a viable option. Without that possibility, I must accept that pursuing this project is beyond my physical capacity.
What frequency would you crossover?Today i would use different drivers for that kind of box (if you want to do it right). The Faital 10FE330 looks like a better replacement for that A26RE4 driver (or the original), and the SB26ADC a better tweeter than what most use (The Morel CAT378 or Seas TC35). Put it on a wide frontbaffle cabinet, and tune it to your wishes with a simple reflex and use a simple but right crossover
probally at 1500Hz altough until 2kHz is possible with this woofer, the tweeter can also go lower, but i like keep some margin. But you will need a full 2 way crossover, probally mixed 2nd-3th order with this woofer, not only a cap on the tweeter. So measure the drivers in the box and start from there.
Here is a complete project by a respected designer, inspired by the Snell Type E-III (as was the AN-E, by the way): SEAS-22.
Alex
Alex
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Audio Note-inspired Speaker build