And using nouns as verbs -- input was exclusively a noun when I was young but I think that most dictionaries list it as both a noun and a verb these days.
Pete
Oh yes, especially if Sam Altman gets even a small percentage of the $7 trillion he's asking for (This is NOT a joke!).
Regarding language changing, this is a quote from a while back:
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/906928-ye-knowe-eek-that-in-forme-of-speche-is-chaunge
So yes indeed, language is changing.
Including the advent of sentence fragments.
One thing I've noticed in AI-generated text is it's all full sentences, and not the fragments that have started appearing in books, magazines and online articles in the last couple of decades. This suggests to me that the vast majority of of the "training data" is from books published before the 21st Century.
innit mate!
More seriously its the quality of the graphics is highly important in a textbook, and separates engaging material from the harder-going stuff. To my knowledge no-one's applied AI to visual communication
More seriously its the quality of the graphics is highly important in a textbook, and separates engaging material from the harder-going stuff. To my knowledge no-one's applied AI to visual communication
This one is very interesting:
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/...hatbots-instead-of-humans-for-political-polls
More from the company's website (and presently, this is apparently an enterprise of seven humans):
https://aaruaaru.com/AaruWhitepaper.pdf
Who cares about books on DIY audio anymore? What we really need is better AI prompt writers. Then we can predict the future success of new audio products.
Apparently someone can now use chatbots like ChatGPT to get virtually any crowd-based answer without having to design a traditional rule-based multi-agent system, but instead design a series of rather large collections of AI surrogates.
Scary? It's already happening. All it apparently takes is someone to pay 1/10th the price of a typical human-based survey for these 7 individuals to give their customers the "ground truth" answers they seek.
Chris
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/...hatbots-instead-of-humans-for-political-polls
More from the company's website (and presently, this is apparently an enterprise of seven humans):
https://aaruaaru.com/AaruWhitepaper.pdf
Who cares about books on DIY audio anymore? What we really need is better AI prompt writers. Then we can predict the future success of new audio products.
Apparently someone can now use chatbots like ChatGPT to get virtually any crowd-based answer without having to design a traditional rule-based multi-agent system, but instead design a series of rather large collections of AI surrogates.
Scary? It's already happening. All it apparently takes is someone to pay 1/10th the price of a typical human-based survey for these 7 individuals to give their customers the "ground truth" answers they seek.
Chris
I found this to be almost terrifying:
What are the safeguards on this? How does this play with the knowledge that there are so many people who 1) vote, but 2) are unable to distinguish and apply proper amounts of skepticism to things like the news that they're getting...from places like tiktok?
Remember the 1938 Orson Welles radio broadcast of War of the Worlds, and the fallout it caused? Scary to think about.
But ready or not...
Chris
What are the safeguards on this? How does this play with the knowledge that there are so many people who 1) vote, but 2) are unable to distinguish and apply proper amounts of skepticism to things like the news that they're getting...from places like tiktok?
Remember the 1938 Orson Welles radio broadcast of War of the Worlds, and the fallout it caused? Scary to think about.
But ready or not...
Chris