No, I was in Lyon and Bezier. I had one of the best meals of my life last Saturday. I'm not impressed with French cars, but you folks sure do know how to cook!
Unless you have a driver whose frequency response is perfectly flat for several octaves beyond the crossover point, it's usually futile to even try a 6 dB crossover. I don't tend to use them much except in things like 6 or 7 way systems. Bad problems with lobing, power handling, distortion, and hitting target frequency responses.
Unless you have a driver whose frequency response is perfectly flat for several octaves beyond the crossover point, it's usually futile to even try a 6 dB crossover. I don't tend to use them much except in things like 6 or 7 way systems. Bad problems with lobing, power handling, distortion, and hitting target frequency responses.
SY said:No, I was in Lyon and Bezier. I had one of the best meals of my life last Saturday. I'm not impressed with French cars, but you folks sure do know how to cook!
Unless you have a driver whose frequency response is perfectly flat for several octaves beyond the crossover point, it's usually futile to even try a 6 dB crossover. I don't tend to use them much except in things like 6 or 7 way systems. Bad problems with lobing, power handling, distortion, and hitting target frequency responses.
Bezier is nice, beautifull castle on the top of the city 🙂
Don't criticize our cars, the new renault's design is the only think you're allowed to laugh at 😉
What was the good meal you ate? I'm becoming hungry....
For the crossover, sure that 6dB has also disadvantages, if it hadn't, everyone would use it. Little power handling is no problem for me. Can you explain me why it has more distorsion?
I'l like to know more about lobing, I haven't found much infos about this, can you explain me what it is, or do you have a good url? 🙂
thanks
Alex
Bric, go to Maison Borie in Lyon's Gerland district. Tell the maitre d' (a beautiful woman named Laurence) that you heard about it from some crazy American friend of theirs that makes corks. And don't order from the menu, just put yourself in the chef's hands. A memorable experience, and I say that as someone whose occupation has made it fortunately possible to travel a lot and eat at some pretty fine establishments.
Lobing is a complicated issue best made clear with drawings. It's the result of the complex (in a mathematical sense!) interactions of radiators separated in space. There's an elementary treatment in the infamous Loudspeaker Design Cookbook. Additionally, you can model lobing using some of the free software from the FRD consortium.
Now, as to distortion, it's normally a result of lack of sufficient low frequency rolloff. If a tweeter, for example, is rolled off too slowly, it will have to handle more low frequency energy. That means more excursion. That means more distortion and lower power handling.
Lobing is a complicated issue best made clear with drawings. It's the result of the complex (in a mathematical sense!) interactions of radiators separated in space. There's an elementary treatment in the infamous Loudspeaker Design Cookbook. Additionally, you can model lobing using some of the free software from the FRD consortium.
Now, as to distortion, it's normally a result of lack of sufficient low frequency rolloff. If a tweeter, for example, is rolled off too slowly, it will have to handle more low frequency energy. That means more excursion. That means more distortion and lower power handling.
Now I know where to eat when I go to Lyon 😉
unfortunately, I don't have the LDC, and FRD's excell worksheet don't work on my #]#{@[^\ french excell
unfortunately, I don't have the LDC, and FRD's excell worksheet don't work on my #]#{@[^\ french excell
OK, so it's not just cars, then.
LDC can be shipped to France. Amazon carries it. When's your birthday?
Lyon is just a few hours away. It's worth the trip, I assure you, if only to look at Laurence.
LDC can be shipped to France. Amazon carries it. When's your birthday?
Lyon is just a few hours away. It's worth the trip, I assure you, if only to look at Laurence.
If I want to see beautifull chicks, going out in Strasbourg is faster 🙂
Especially now, when the weather is sunny and hot 😀
Especially now, when the weather is sunny and hot 😀
Hello,
I built the Audax Home Theater speakers designed by JoeD'Appolito. I can't remember which drivers are used but I have been very pleased with them. I posted some links to my construction below.
http://lotuseuropa0.tripod.com/audax_center001.htm
http://lotuseuropa0.tripod.com/audax_front_speakers001.htm
I built the Audax Home Theater speakers designed by JoeD'Appolito. I can't remember which drivers are used but I have been very pleased with them. I posted some links to my construction below.
http://lotuseuropa0.tripod.com/audax_center001.htm
http://lotuseuropa0.tripod.com/audax_front_speakers001.htm
Hello Bricolo
If budget is the limit, go for Z18 or G8 + A16. I think its an unbeatable combination for the money. Use LR 24 for A16, it really helps. Use very thick aircores in the (whatever you end up) TW circuit anyway, it helps with IMD.
Remember that A16 which is a great tweeter sounds broken compared to A20...maybe you can wait a little and save for the new HF unit. It takes 120W also and its far less prone to lower frequency intake induced distortion with lesser slopes too.
Good luck
Salas
If budget is the limit, go for Z18 or G8 + A16. I think its an unbeatable combination for the money. Use LR 24 for A16, it really helps. Use very thick aircores in the (whatever you end up) TW circuit anyway, it helps with IMD.
Remember that A16 which is a great tweeter sounds broken compared to A20...maybe you can wait a little and save for the new HF unit. It takes 120W also and its far less prone to lower frequency intake induced distortion with lesser slopes too.
Good luck
Salas
I was thinking about the old but good TW025M0
I've heard so many good things about this tweeter 🙂
or a seas 27TFFC
I've heard so many good things about this tweeter 🙂
or a seas 27TFFC
TW025M0
Yes its a very good unit. Better than the Seas. Dont eq it for its hf rise, its calculated for balanced overall spatial energy distribution.
Go for it
Salas
Yes its a very good unit. Better than the Seas. Dont eq it for its hf rise, its calculated for balanced overall spatial energy distribution.
Go for it
Salas
Bricolo
As you have mentioned the seas 27tffc (or H881 as it is also known). Look at this design where it is used with the HM170Z18.
IPL A2 Mk4
The previous version of this speaker used the Audax tweeter, but when that was discontinued it was changed to the seas. The designer claims this was an improvement, I can't confirm this as I never heard that Audax tweeter, but I have built the current version of this speaker, and it sounds good to me! If you don't fancy designing a x-o then I can recommend this design. Though perhaps you are looking forward to more of a challenge?
The seas tweeter has a very good reputation generally for robustness and sound quallty for the price, though it is more expensive than the Audax was, which was legendary for value.
Ian
As you have mentioned the seas 27tffc (or H881 as it is also known). Look at this design where it is used with the HM170Z18.
IPL A2 Mk4
The previous version of this speaker used the Audax tweeter, but when that was discontinued it was changed to the seas. The designer claims this was an improvement, I can't confirm this as I never heard that Audax tweeter, but I have built the current version of this speaker, and it sounds good to me! If you don't fancy designing a x-o then I can recommend this design. Though perhaps you are looking forward to more of a challenge?
The seas tweeter has a very good reputation generally for robustness and sound quallty for the price, though it is more expensive than the Audax was, which was legendary for value.
Ian
Ian J said:
The previous version of this speaker used the Audax tweeter, but when that was discontinued it was changed to the seas. The designer claims this was an improvement
which audax tweeter?
Sorry, the Audax TW025m1 was used, not the m0. I don't know how different these 2 units are. The UK magazine HiFiWorld developed a number of kits using both these tweeters (like the KLS 9 I referred you to earlier). I saw a theoretical design by the then editor which used the HM170Z0 with 1mH matched to the TW0m25m1 with just a 7.5uF cap and a 2.2/22 Ohm L-pad as the mid and high of a large open baffle using 2 PR330 paper drivers for bass. I don't know if anyone ever built it, but the designer, Dominic Baker, went on to greater things. He designed the new JMLab Grand(e) Utopia (sorry can't remember if that has 'e' on Grand). If you can get either of these tweeters they are probably worth it. There is also a cheaper veresion of the seas without the rear chamber which has to be used at higher x-o freq. IPL uses it in another kit matched to one of his own drivers.
Ian
Ian
The TW025M1 has ferrofluid, the TW025M0 hasn't
that's one difference
The other difference is that only the M0 is still available
that's one difference
The other difference is that only the M0 is still available
Hello,
I'm building an Auriga, it a design from Tony Gee who is quite well known over here as it comes to building loudspeakers.
This design uses 2 HM170Z18's. http://home.hetnet.nl/~geenius/index.html
In the left bar you can see the Auriga design. Lots of information about the crossover, as one of the drivers goes to about 3500 Hz.
I'm building an Auriga, it a design from Tony Gee who is quite well known over here as it comes to building loudspeakers.
This design uses 2 HM170Z18's. http://home.hetnet.nl/~geenius/index.html
In the left bar you can see the Auriga design. Lots of information about the crossover, as one of the drivers goes to about 3500 Hz.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Any experience with the Audax HM170G8, HM170Z18 or HM170C0?