Sorry, the first part is has speaker treatment connotation and is used with a ss and may have an astronomical correlation to feedback; thoughts on specific relations to interrelationships would be interesting. It developed with the second point being more on topic. Let me know if I need to edit and repost. Thanks
@magineptduhs
Finding some sense in your first paragraph required the use of artificial intelligence, I didn't bother with the second. Here is the AI reply:
===
There are a few options for measuring audio sound setup that don't require computer programs:
1. An audio spectrum analyzer: This is a device that displays the frequency content of an audio signal. It can help you identify any frequency phase differences and measure changes in the frequency spectrum due to different variables.
2. A sound level meter: This is a device that measures the sound pressure level of an audio signal. It can help you measure changes in the overall loudness of the sound due to different variables.
3. A oscilloscope: This is a device that displays the electrical signal of an audio signal over time. It can help you measure changes in the waveform of the sound due to different variables.
4. A microphone and sound recording software: You can use a microphone to record audio samples and then analyze them using sound recording software, such as Audacity. This can help you measure changes in the sound due to different variables.
It's worth noting that you might need to consult with a professional audio engineer for complex measurements, but this equipment will give you a good starting point for your research.
====
Cheers.
Finding some sense in your first paragraph required the use of artificial intelligence, I didn't bother with the second. Here is the AI reply:
===
There are a few options for measuring audio sound setup that don't require computer programs:
1. An audio spectrum analyzer: This is a device that displays the frequency content of an audio signal. It can help you identify any frequency phase differences and measure changes in the frequency spectrum due to different variables.
2. A sound level meter: This is a device that measures the sound pressure level of an audio signal. It can help you measure changes in the overall loudness of the sound due to different variables.
3. A oscilloscope: This is a device that displays the electrical signal of an audio signal over time. It can help you measure changes in the waveform of the sound due to different variables.
4. A microphone and sound recording software: You can use a microphone to record audio samples and then analyze them using sound recording software, such as Audacity. This can help you measure changes in the sound due to different variables.
It's worth noting that you might need to consult with a professional audio engineer for complex measurements, but this equipment will give you a good starting point for your research.
====
Cheers.
The second paragraph has those words indicating HF, me too, quite jerogliphical .
In LF, as is pertaining to audio, I like words such: Envelope - that's great!
Ringing, also ringing...I don't understand this 'ringing'...go figure the PRE- ringing!
It must be some digital dyabolical artefice
CArrier...I like carrier! ( it's like air for the sound )
Whatever you're smokin' - I'd like some of that too. Be careful not to do too much!
I actually got to experiment with a ring modulator when I was in high school. Jan Hammer of jazz fusion fame was already using one with his Fender Rhoads piano in the early Mahavishnu Orchestra. He used a tone to modulate his piano and I believe he could warble that tone to get a second effect on the piano sound.
I did something different. The guy who lent me the ring modulator was also interested in me making a phase shifter, as these were popular at the time. Somehow I connected the ring modulator to a Whurlitzer electric piano in the high school's music room - on one input - and the same sound, only delayed by the phase shifter, to the other.
This effectively multiplied the piano's sound by the delayed piano's sound, as the "carrier". I can barely recall, but I remember when playing an ascending scale, I'd get a decending scale along with it coming out of the ring modulator's output.
Well? You said ring modulator - see what you get? Reality. Master of, that is...
Lol, you guys are hilarious. Trust me I don't need any substance to be unusual. It's partially genetic, little envionment. Nevertheless, I appreciate you risking little bits of sanity to calloborate. Lmao
I was looking at Einstein's, Wein's, and Planck's Black Body Theory of Carbon movement and what I basically made of it, there was bonding, photon movement, with half life radioisotopes exchanges with atomic weight and position by each factor. In doing so, I questioned if atmospheric weight was effected by sound. I took a simple tempature of a blown up balloon and placed it in front of music and recorded the the balloon tempature before and during, unfortunately not after placement. The tempature of the balloon would drop a few degrees the majority of the attempts. I would say it was significant reliability, but didn't detail that much. In doing so, I did a rudimentary application of relating the laws of thermodynamics, which it been several years, so I don't remember my precise conclusion.
Introduction of disco ball, a lighted disco ball, and eventually a rotating disco ball in all settings came to mind from the previous read. I would like to see about the slightest electromagnetic effects, which I doubt instrumentation could read because it probably would be intruded on by biometric infringing factors. A sterile environment with nobody present is not possible either so the factors of seeing a correlation are probably neil. The light measurements and analysis is easier because I can measure the heat from a lighted source and maybe find an analysis to find validity. As I understand, light mediums and sound mediums are perpendicular to one another, but would have to reexamine to know if I am understanding correctly. But still, I can measure the heat exchange of a constant frequencies between Lf's and Hf's, ah. In doing so, I hypothesis, if there is a brief exchange of differences, a slight moving mirror magnification would provide negative entropy briefly at a particular point and cause a constant rate of exchange from the moving lighted disco ball. No? Lol
I was looking at Einstein's, Wein's, and Planck's Black Body Theory of Carbon movement and what I basically made of it, there was bonding, photon movement, with half life radioisotopes exchanges with atomic weight and position by each factor. In doing so, I questioned if atmospheric weight was effected by sound. I took a simple tempature of a blown up balloon and placed it in front of music and recorded the the balloon tempature before and during, unfortunately not after placement. The tempature of the balloon would drop a few degrees the majority of the attempts. I would say it was significant reliability, but didn't detail that much. In doing so, I did a rudimentary application of relating the laws of thermodynamics, which it been several years, so I don't remember my precise conclusion.
Introduction of disco ball, a lighted disco ball, and eventually a rotating disco ball in all settings came to mind from the previous read. I would like to see about the slightest electromagnetic effects, which I doubt instrumentation could read because it probably would be intruded on by biometric infringing factors. A sterile environment with nobody present is not possible either so the factors of seeing a correlation are probably neil. The light measurements and analysis is easier because I can measure the heat from a lighted source and maybe find an analysis to find validity. As I understand, light mediums and sound mediums are perpendicular to one another, but would have to reexamine to know if I am understanding correctly. But still, I can measure the heat exchange of a constant frequencies between Lf's and Hf's, ah. In doing so, I hypothesis, if there is a brief exchange of differences, a slight moving mirror magnification would provide negative entropy briefly at a particular point and cause a constant rate of exchange from the moving lighted disco ball. No? Lol
Last edited:
Light happens istantaneously, it travels at the speed of light. Sound is a slow propagation phenomenon
👍
Makes light measurement difficult, but particle spectrum density and length, aka lumens is manageable from what I understand in an inarticulate way.
Energy and heat seem to cross paths between light and sound, possibly effecting pressure and negative entropy within a magnified area, according to thermodynamics. This is grossly muddled.
Basically, the heat and energy from light travels would effect pressures of sound that reach capacity of pressure not heat and start to entropy otherwise. Not exactly thermodynamics, but a loose extrapolation.
A gradient change within little areas, if you will. Creating space within an otherwise linear constant.
Update: I decided not to try rotating disco balls, which is a little mania extremism.
I did look more into laws of thermodynamics and black body theory and found that heat shortens sound wavelengths. In doing so, I placed 2 dyson fans near rear ports of speakers. And 2 lamps near the front side at about tweeter level. I ordered Tiffany style lamp shades with money that would have went to a simple piece of testing gear, because I feel the result will get more use and is vastly more tasteful. CONCLUSION: It's been 5 whole minutes and I am exited. The stage seems a little deeper and I am kind of gity. Placebo or not, the little sanity that creeped in feels well played. Lol
I did look more into laws of thermodynamics and black body theory and found that heat shortens sound wavelengths. In doing so, I placed 2 dyson fans near rear ports of speakers. And 2 lamps near the front side at about tweeter level. I ordered Tiffany style lamp shades with money that would have went to a simple piece of testing gear, because I feel the result will get more use and is vastly more tasteful. CONCLUSION: It's been 5 whole minutes and I am exited. The stage seems a little deeper and I am kind of gity. Placebo or not, the little sanity that creeped in feels well played. Lol
So after 40 minutes sound got a little stagnet so I changed the dynamics for a few minutes by turning up the fans putting them on rotatation and shutting off the lights for ten minutes. Didn't pay attention to hf, but lf's thinned out way too much. I let the lights cool and returned to previous settings. The whole seemed refreshed, newer, and exciting all over. I figure if I change any of the 24 to 50 new options in stagnation my hyperactivity will keep entertained and I'll generate a whole sense of newness. This should keep me entertained for awhile. Knee lift happy fart. Lol in other words, feelin good! 25 minutes later, same, but now I have my dysons that the remote can see and I just adjust to my liking, can here immedite changes, yet to experiment with lights, but if there's changes, those will get remoted too.
Last edited: