AliExpress preamp/tone module - question re. no-so-common opamp rail filters

JRC4558 tone control board.jpeg
JRC4558 tone control board power supply.jpeg


I was tracing the schematic of this preamp/tone control board I bought from Aliexpress and found to my surprise an unusual (to me) filter on the power supply rails. Can someone give me a quick overview, or just some comments, on the effectiveness (or lack of) of this arrangement? The IC used in this position is "D358" with no other visible markings.
 
Trying to understand this 7812/7912 filter cct - it llooks like the D358 IC is attempting to smooth the AC ripple at the output of the 7812/7912, by comparing the AC output signal at the output of the 7812/7912 to the power supply's AC GND. That's as far as I can get so far.
 
Trying to understand this 7812/7912 filter cct - it llooks like the D358 IC is attempting to smooth the AC ripple at the output of the 7812/7912, by comparing the AC output signal at the output of the 7812/7912 to the power supply's AC GND. That's as far as I can get so far.
That appears to be the general idea they had in mind. It responds to reduce ripple by superimposing the inverse on to the ground pin of the 7812/7912. Additional to the situation which Tom mentioned, this is supposed to have 0.1uF between the regulator output and actual return path for that reg to remain stable. That might be capacitor “473”, but it should be checked.

I only see three op amps on the board, so IC3a/IC3b for ripple regulation appear to be in the same package, D358.
 
Yep. Though the 7812 and 7912 are not designed to be floating regulators. I wonder how this circuit behaves on start-up. Too bad they didn't want to "splurge" on a pair of LM317/337.

Tom
Technics did use this kind of regulator enhancer circuit, but they provide a resistor to ground connected to the ground pin of the regulator, not only the opamp output. That may be to handle a startup issue related to the quiescent current.

https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...tor-for-dac-clock.304013/page-10#post-6361772

I'll sim both circuit If I find some time today, I've seen unofficial transistor model of 78 reg on Internet.
 
I'll sim both circuit If I find some time today, I've seen unofficial transistor model of 78 reg on Internet.
I've got these, source unknown, don't know how good they are as I don't think I've ever used them.

Cheers,
Cabirio

Edit: 1 is input, 2 is common, 3 is output
 

Attachments

Thank you for the files Cabirio.

I have made some quick tests with them, and I was not convinced by the result. After some Internet search, I found that 78xx model was available into the example/Education folder of LTSpice distribution ! (LM78XX.asc file).

I have made sim for 7815 alone, for @Elvee DxNoiser, for OP circuit, and for Technics circuit.
For the LM358 I found a genuine NS model, same for NJM4580 with an original JRC model.
I removed the 100uF output cap, because it produces massive peaking and reduce reject band size.

Circuits :

1717840924583.png


1717840946443.png

1717841077963.png


Vout/V2 :
  • Green : 7815
  • Light blue : Technics
  • Red : Ali
  • Dark blue : DxNoiser

1717841207561.png


Using much better opamp on ALi only slightly expand reject band, so no need to replace the old LM358... which produce, at least on this sim with, the best result. DxNoiser is very good to has a major advantage : it doesn't require a negative supply.

I'll try to simulate transients at startup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabirio
Startup :

1717844868040.png


  • Light blue : Vin
  • Pink, blue, red : 7815 ,Technics, DxNoiser
  • Green : Ali
Focus on Ali :

Now use a symetric supply :
1717845119842.png


1717845325222.png

  • Green : Vin
  • Pink : 7815 GND pin current
  • Dark blue : Vout
  • Red : 7815 GND pin voltage
This is a very soft start circuit !
 
With the LM358, I don't think you need a negative supply.
Opamps can certainly provide an excellent PSRR and output impedance, but none can match the noise performance of a humble transistor. If the priority is PSRR and Zout, that's perfectly fine, but if you also need the noise reduction feature, a discrete is mandatory
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frabor