A switch to reverse Tweeter polarity: any manufacturer?

Hi, do you know any commercial loudspeaker or DIY project (old, vintage or current) with a switchable tweeter polarity ?

Do you disapprove this technique a priori in a new loudspeaker design with first order filter ?
No, not yet. I have only seen commercial speakers with L-pads for tweeter and/or for the mid.
But polarity switch? Why.
Tweeter polarity is either correct, when transition from mid to tweeter is seamless, or incorrect, when there is dip in the crossover frequency due to cancellation.

There is a thread when this was discussed and fr response plots with correct and incorrect tweeter polarity were shown.

Why would you want to listen with incorrect polarity?
 
Tweeter polarity is either correct, when transition from mid to tweeter is seamless, or incorrect, when there is dip in the crossover frequency due to cancellation.

There is a thread when this was discussed and fr response plots with correct and incorrect tweeter polarity were shown.
The reason was hinted at above. For a first-order acoustic crossover there isn't necessarily a correct (or incorrect) polarity for a tweeter.
If non-coincident drivers the lobe would move. This might be the objective of the OP.

Dave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomtt
Using a DSP box gives one this facility.

My MEH have both drivers in phase but one must tailor the passband which will probably be very tricky with a speaker level crossover. Of course, for a flat passband one would always have to tailor the response ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomtt
You seem to be flying above most Forum members 🙄

In fact it was fully answered in posts #6 and #8 , others offered useful "how to" without delving in its weirdness.
No, actually it was fully answered in post #3.
I seem to be flying a decent course, but most everybody else has their autopilot set to the wrong waypoint.

A polarity reversal on a true, first-order acoustic crossover might have a specific objective for the OP.
Let me say it again........when he returns maybe he will elaborate.

Dave.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tomtt
I recommend a three position switch having two sections or "poles". Such as a DP3T rotary switch, or a toggle switch with ON-OFF-ON action. This guarantees break before make operation, which is safer for both the amplifier and the tweeter. My beloved Keithley 225 current source (built 1976) has this feature -- I call it POS, UNCONNECTED, NEG -- which has prevented disaster on several occasions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JMFahey and GM
Tweeter polarity is either correct, when transition from mid to tweeter is seamless, or incorrect, when there is dip in the crossover frequency due to cancellation.
I can't fully agree with this, it can still not sound right.

Some are concerned that phase runs at different rates (one is steeper).. however the problem extends to the lobing pattern created as well. The interaction when designing is complex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomtt
I can't fully agree with this, it can still not sound right.

Some are concerned that phase runs at different rates (one is steeper).. however the problem extends to the lobing pattern created as well. The interaction when designing is complex.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
There are only two ways to connect the tweeter, the correct way or wrong way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: audiomovil
The reason was hinted at above. For a first-order acoustic crossover there isn't necessarily a correct (or incorrect) polarity for a tweeter.
If non-coincident drivers the lobe would move. This might be the objective of the OP.

Dave.
Theoretically, on axis, one setting would lead to a flat phase response and the other to all-pass filter behaviour. The lobing is probably more important, though.