9.8L Markaudio CHR70 Fullrange first speaker design & build questions

Hey all! As my first ever design and build I am finally in the test box stage and got some measurements yesterday.
  • Fullrange Markaudio CHR70
  • Around 9.8L box with front facing slatted port and some fluffy stuffing and damping lining
    • Box/Port FB: 51.2 Hz
    • F3: 49 Hz
    • Port length 9"
    • Port area 5"
Did quasi anechoic measurements with far field gated/windowed above 150hz and Port with woofer combined w/baffle diffraction for near field tests, attached is the response. Few caveats: front baffle is not glued to the box as i am experimenting with stuffing/damping but firmly attached with gaskets and clamps (i know not perfect but had to compromise while testing).

* Thick Blue/yellow line is my measured speaker response
** Orange is actual Markaudio CHR70 manufacturer response
*** Black line is my enclosure simulation from VirtuixCAD

1. Is it normal for simulated low end response be this far off from actual real world measurements?
2. Not worried too much about 100hz to 500hz as I am planning on implementing baffle correction via passive or DSP
3. Any suggestions on what might be causing exaggerated spike/dip around 1500hz and what can be done?
4. Spike above 10khz is tracking manufacturers response almost one to one... do people typically leave it as it is with fullrange build?

Overall I am pretty satisfied with my first try, spent a lot of time simulating this box. Looking for suggestions for improvements and general feedback. Thank you all!

CH70 response.png


Screenshot 2023-03-11 at 4.15.46 PM.pngIMG_3265.jpegIMG_3312.jpeg
 
If i use your numbers, and assume that given you have a round-over, the effective length is 8.5” i get this sim. Is that what you simmed?

CHR-73-98L-sim.png


Also note that while useful in figuring out your alignment F3 is meaningless to humans (ref Toole), better to use F10 (low 40s), and F6 (high 40s)

dave
 
  • Like
Reactions: rm-studio
It's 0110 here, so I only have a minute before attempting to get some sleep (unlikely, but you never know your luck). Re the ~1.1Khz - 2.1KHz region, probably some edge diffraction; it's in the right region & the characteristics are fairly typical. For the LF -it could be a number of things; an impedance plot would help narrow it down.
 
It's 0110 here, so I only have a minute before attempting to get some sleep (unlikely, but you never know your luck). Re the ~1.1Khz - 2.1KHz region, probably some edge diffraction; it's in the right region & the characteristics are fairly typical. For the LF -it could be a number of things; an impedance plot would help narrow it down.
Thank you for your time sir! I will be measuring impedance in the next couple of days and will post here. Good night!
 
1. Is it normal for simulated low end response be this far off from actual real world measurements?

3. Any suggestions on what might be causing exaggerated spike/dip around 1500hz and what can be done?
1. Depends on which software used, how measured.

3. Hmm, driver centered at ~13543/2/4 = ~1693 Hz dip, 5.5 = ~ 1231 Hz, so summed = ~ sqrt(1231*1693) = 1444 Hz center frequency dip and why off center and dims not close to each other is recommended, so ideally need some baffle face damping and/or diffraction devices tacked on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scottmoose
1. Is it normal for simulated low end response be this far off from actual real world measurements?
2. ...
3. Any suggestions on what might be causing exaggerated spike/dip around 1500hz and what can be done?
4. Spike above 10khz is tracking manufacturers response almost one to one... do people typically leave it as it is with fullrange build?

View attachment 1152518
Hello

nice work !
some answers / impressions

1) yes - if you measure direct very close to the membran. Repeart measurement at the usually notetd 1m distance oder minimum at baffle width distance.
2)...
3) may be artefact from measurement so close
4) had that driver for a longer time without care to the peak above 10kHz.