4" Full Range Transmission Line - Aucharm speakers

I give up to model my own TL design, cause the parameters from aliexpress might be wrong, so this could end up in a tradgey. I saw some people using Pensil or Frugal Horn MK3 have good results. But I think thery are too big, want something easy to carry, anyone have a suggestion of a design up to 50 cms of height?
thanks
 
OK… it is not overly suitable for vented, a 9 litre miniOnkne with high R vents works to knock the peak in the sim down, the other is 9 litre butterworth sealed with no damping. To get a significanrt drop in Q you have to go real big, up to 135 litres. So as long as sealed is at least 9 litres you can make it as large as you want. Pay attention to F6, F10, not F3.

Vented does not work larger (or very well with a tubular duct)

attachment.php


These are the appropriate miniOnkens that would be repurposed.

Classic Golden Ratio. These are freely available, choose one ill figure the vent details. CGR dFonken125

deciSize-CGR-visualization.png


The next 2 would require a planset subscription.

Rectangular miniOnken.

dMKp7R-extents.gif


Full-on Trapezoidal miniOnken.

dMKp7T-extents.gif


dave
 

Attachments

  • Auracharm-DG-403-sims.png
    Auracharm-DG-403-sims.png
    15.1 KB · Views: 807
So I designed a TL Sl/So = 0.5, tunning to 50Hz. But I think the speaker is too close to the wood behind, there is any problem?

OK, a quick approximation in HR of your ML-TQWT [vented inverse tapered TL] yields a ~53 Hz Fp Vs the 1/4 WL calc'd. ~61 Hz and because it has so little net volume [Vb] it rolls off at ~2nd order [12 dB/octave] below 100 Hz, so not a bad design, just not 'fat' enough to go low.

Yes, ideally need at least 1.5x driver depth all the way around it and definitely at least cone depth.
 
Last edited:
You're welcome!

Understood, MJK prefers to use Bl instead of Qes, which no way to guess other than looking at the magnet size AFAIK [FWIW I used 72 Hz Fs, 0.64 Qes, 5.06 Qms, 3.66 Bl], when all we really need is Qts' for calculating a box size plus damping 'fudge' factor [4-10x Vas depending on Qts'], so while his alignment is technically the most correct from a sealed or BR alignment POV, it doesn't account for the extra volume required to add damping and still get a ~flat response down to Fs and why I use to describe his TLs as having all the 'fat' trimmed off my much larger ones. 😉
 
Last edited:
More like nightmares with post civil war Ga. rough cut yellow pine board siding, not to mention originally uncured [full] size lumber my 'stick built' house is constructed with. 🙁
 
Last edited:
Oh! Performance wise they're 'fabulous', like well damped iron construction and with those boxes full of probably a couple of thousand coins perched on top to mass load them they are certainly rigid/massive enough, but by the same token, a nightmare to plane flat/square, then trying to drill for blind screws.

Buzz has long since moved to a house where he says they sound even better [no surprise compared to an upstairs apt.], no doubt due somewhat to 'framing' a large stone fireplace and still gets a lot of praise, want to sell, etc., from everyone that hears them. Not too shabby for a pair of tweaked RS 40-1354s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjbond3rd