i just started off using onshape(.com) .... if you dont care that your designs are open source its a great free solution imo
@Ghoostknight https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/2/360
A place to start and find the generally used words in the scientific world.
Mpp and so on.
A place to start and find the generally used words in the scientific world.
Mpp and so on.
thanks, didnt know multilayer was a thing, the absorbtion curves look really promising as you get a second peak in lower frequencys@Ghoostknight https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/2/360
A place to start and find the generally used words in the scientific world.
Mpp and so on.
useful calculator i found: https://www.acousticmodelling.com/ but it doesnt support multilayer perforated panels
Don`t confuse mpp with a perforated panel. The microperforated panel is sub mm size holes compared to a more conventional perforated panel.
There's different functions in play, sort of. This seems to be the agreed upon origin to the mpp https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=PASCAL7588507573
The tweeks one can do is amount of sub mm holes/surface area, the depth of the back chamber, and also depth of the actual hole.
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._thick_micro-perforated_panel_sound_absorbers
There's different functions in play, sort of. This seems to be the agreed upon origin to the mpp https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=PASCAL7588507573
The tweeks one can do is amount of sub mm holes/surface area, the depth of the back chamber, and also depth of the actual hole.
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._thick_micro-perforated_panel_sound_absorbers
perforated panels are pretty much the same as microperforated ones as i understand it, both are based on helmholtz resonators...... the only differences is that the micro hole size allows for another variable, which is velocity change from baffle to microhole which gives a little additional absorbtionDon`t confuse mpp with a perforated panel. The microperforated panel is sub mm size holes compared to a more conventional perforated panel.
There's different functions in play, sort of. This seems to be the agreed upon origin to the mpp https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=PASCAL7588507573
tho i would get my hopes too much up making MPP's with a FDM 3d printer, you are probably lucky if you get "close to perfect" 0.5-1mm holes
ah doesnt look too bad ! what is this part of?
i guess best case would be 0.1-0.2mm with a fdm printer
i think the velocity change thing on microholes is something gradually increasing (with decreasing size), so even 1mm holes could already benefit a bit from it
i guess best case would be 0.1-0.2mm with a fdm printer
i think the velocity change thing on microholes is something gradually increasing (with decreasing size), so even 1mm holes could already benefit a bit from it
I’m not going to distract to much, but I’m continuing the work on making my tiny 4” coaxial with controlled directivity.
I have since the last time tried adding a center tube in the back chamber that is a press fit against the magnet with micro perforation like example C in this paper. https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/a.../acoustics-03-00031-v2.pdf?version=1625566551
So there’s three rows with 36 0,9mm holes close to the open back, then there’s 3x36 0,7mm, 3x36 0,5mm, 3x36 0,3mm.
The tiny holes is one layer thick on my 0,4mm nozzle. In the...
I have since the last time tried adding a center tube in the back chamber that is a press fit against the magnet with micro perforation like example C in this paper. https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/a.../acoustics-03-00031-v2.pdf?version=1625566551
So there’s three rows with 36 0,9mm holes close to the open back, then there’s 3x36 0,7mm, 3x36 0,5mm, 3x36 0,3mm.
The tiny holes is one layer thick on my 0,4mm nozzle. In the...
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- 3d printers recommendations for printing horns and waveguides