8" Duelund Woofer - New to me

Pics!

duelund-woofer-800.jpg


duelund-woofer-side-800.jpg


duelund-rear-800.jpg
 
This is basicly a Scan Speak 21W/8554 with a huge magnetic system, it is designed many years ago by Scan Speak together with Steen Duelund. For his low Q speaker designs (sealed box). The yellow kevlar cone and surround is coated with black coat. The new thing is the wood phaseplug. I expect the rest of the design is the same.
 
let's not forget this is a brand name not shy about asking "carriage trade" prices for passive crossover and high voltage capacitors - you know, "sir, if you have to ask the price..."

I mean, over $500 ea for 2mf @100V CAST Hybrid Cu/Ag caps? Those are prices that make their 5W premium CAST resistors seem a bloody bargain by comparison.

Eric, given any type of multiplier over total production costs, think you might have missed one decimal point for retail pricing on speakers using such units, and presumably Dueland crossover parts as well? 😱
 
Last edited:
Hi Chrisb!!

Hahahah.

Well, my back-of-the-envelope model doesn't give a whits behind about crossover parts. 🙂

What I find most correlated is simply driver cost, when that is known. It is still a very loose correlation. Brand name can push or pull this up or down quite a bit.

Best,

E
 
I'm possibly one of about ten people who have read all of Swede Steen Duelund's stuff. John Kreskovsky is another for sure. 😱

Duelund invented the B&W Matrix closed box idea. Lots of stuffing attached to a frame in the box for instance.

He also put the whole 3 way filter theory on a sound footing.

He was interested in EVERYTHING towards the best sound. He would describe the effect of impedance correction as "Charming"! 😀

This modified Scanspeak woofer 21W/8554 seems to accord with a lot of his ideas. Damping applied to the cone. Replacing the spider with threads, which would only work in closed box IMO. I think it's an acoustic suspension woofer at heart.

http://www.steenduelund.dk/scanspeak8554.pdf

Leading to the new Duelund woofer:

https://hfc-fs.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/duelund_8_inch_precision_audio_driver.pdf

Curiously, 20 years on, the SEAS U22 REXP-SL seems to tick most of the same boxes.

As keen followers of the "Classic Monitors" thread know, Joachim Gerhard is quite smitten with this one.
 

Attachments

  • Duelund Driver.JPG
    Duelund Driver.JPG
    49 KB · Views: 748
  • Duelund Driver FR.PNG
    Duelund Driver FR.PNG
    38.5 KB · Views: 752
  • SEAS U22 REXP-SL.JPG
    SEAS U22 REXP-SL.JPG
    31.3 KB · Views: 699
  • SEAS U22REXP-SL FR.PNG
    SEAS U22REXP-SL FR.PNG
    63.6 KB · Views: 698
Eric - whether your cocktail napkin is soaked in Coors light or Empress 1908 gin, I think it’s folly to not take the price of high parts count / complex XOs into the calculus of finished production costs. My last 2 multiway builds were with all EnABLed drivers ( I know a guy)- except for the MAOP7 in big MTMs - and the total cost using relatively inexpensive Solen films and #14AWG coils was well over $250 per pair.

Boutique brands such as the Duelands, Jantzen, AudioNote, Jupiters, Mundorf.. etc, could easily add at least on decimal point shift to the right in component cost, without I suspect a corresponding step closer to the “holy grail”.

Of course, I’d be happy to be proven wrong about that on the largesse of some angel investor. 😉
 
Chrisb,

Obviously all parts matter (no political pun intended) !

What I'm saying is that the marketing seems to work backwards from desired sales price.

"Hey, we need to sell a $120k pair of speakers" means they go shopping for 6k worth of drivers. What they spend on the inside, who knows. Wilson famously pots his crossovers for instance.

It is my _impression_ that the feeling is that only the drivers matter when deciding the sales. If they make their own drivers this no longer applies.

Best,

E
 
I was reviewing some Steen Duelund articles. It actually looks like Danish, not Swedish, to me. 😱

Steen's obsession was designing for maximum performance. I can hardly think of an area he didn't mull over.

There is a point of view that you should balance a design. If the drivers are £500, you should hardly skimp on crossover quality. And Steen came up with some fairly exotic resistors, capacitors and toroidal coils.

Probably wasted on cheap drivers. Like sreten said, what's the point of worrying about a ferrite coil attached to a ferrite loudspeaker? Gains are only going to be 50% at max. Similarly wire resistors which increase resistance with temperature aren't adding distortion, only tonal difference with a wire voicecoil which might have a different temperature curve. Capacitors seem to work well enough. Most of the measured anomalies are at low frequencies where thicker metal layers might work better.

Ah well, some fun ideas from his fertile brain. His "Flower" cone is a nice idea. He added layers near the centre to balance the moving mass. He always preferred closed box, as it goes.

Just for fun, here's one of my designs. The capacitor is a 630V mains power grade, the tweeter resistors are 10W sandcast and shouldn't even get warm. Probably the ferrite bass coil is the obvious upgrade to aircoil. But mostly any faults you hear will be cone breakup from the bass and tweeter deficiencies.
 

Attachments

  • Steen_Duelund_Tweeter_Plate.JPG
    Steen_Duelund_Tweeter_Plate.JPG
    57.9 KB · Views: 729
  • Steen_Duelund_Flower_Loudspeaker.JPG
    Steen_Duelund_Flower_Loudspeaker.JPG
    60.6 KB · Views: 482
  • Steen_Duelund_diagram.JPG
    Steen_Duelund_diagram.JPG
    41.3 KB · Views: 1,183
  • Steen_Duelund_Loudspeaker.JPG
    Steen_Duelund_Loudspeaker.JPG
    56.9 KB · Views: 372
  • Simple Crossover.jpg
    Simple Crossover.jpg
    112.2 KB · Views: 382
Last edited: