MAOP-10 in ML-TQWT

Ok, I just suffered through 61 pages of the Pearl Acoustics Sibelius topic only to find that no one had truly offered the MAOP-10 as an alternative for use in a ML-TQWT cabinet like to Sibelius. So I am starting a new thread to discuss that specifically (please no questions about BR cabinets or horse hair stuffing 😵‍💫). Has anyone tried this combination? I am willing to build and test it but would ask for assistance in the cabinet details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mordikai and wchang
I googled your question and found this facebook image. So someone has tried this combo.

1746918965276.png
 
The comment states “The internal is 161 x 231”. No height or anything about whether it is tuned to the MAOP-10. But these dimensions are the same internal width and depth to the Sibelius dimensions so my guess is that he merely built a clone based on the Pearl Acoustics Sibelius thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeifB60
He states in the comments that he does not even know what the terms So and Si mean. Clearly he just copied the Sibelius dimensions.

What I was hoping to start here was a discussion on designing a ML-TQWT cabinet specifically for the MAOP-10.
 
If you post your personal values T/S on your MAOP10.2,
we will have something to go on to optimize the box.
Here is mine.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20211027_162307_optimized.jpg
    IMG_20211027_162307_optimized.jpg
    453.9 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_20211027_162328_optimized.jpg
    IMG_20211027_162328_optimized.jpg
    445 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
T/S may vary for Maop10.2 drivers are adapted to selective selected pairs.
Have seen Fs under 40hz.
Mine were over 43hz.
If you don't have a pair of Maop10.2, they are almost impossible to get hold of.
Unfortunately, they are no longer manufactured.
 
Last edited:
In order:
  • They all are, or should be, since they're pair-matched at the factory and Evan doesn't do that for the good of his health. Whether the dealers do their jobs and supply the matched drivers as they are supposed to, unfortunately is out of our hands. They should be, and if they claim 'we don't offer that service' it should be pointed out that it isn't a 'service' and they don't have to do anything at all other than provide the numbered units the factory have gone to considerable trouble to provide them with.
  • I'm afraid I don't know, but I would expect so.
  • MAOP11 is [was] based on the Pluvia 11. MAOP11MS, as you can probably tell from the name, is based on Alpair 11MS. There is no part commonality between them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeifB60