Subwoofer build

I plan on eventually fixing up my Adcom GFA-535II then maybe finding another one or a smaller GFA series amp and using them with my GFA-545II and a crossover to three way amplify my Advent Maestros.

I'd love to use a GFA series amp for the subs to keep the amps the same series so they all have a real similar sound, but I don't know if there's a GFA series amp that is powerful enough. That said perhaps a class D amp would be best for the subs.
 
The BP4 has LESS total internal volume than the 3ft3 sealed enclosure.
BP4 = 600 watts.
Sealed = 800 watts.
BANDPASS RULES!

1726001698391.png
1726001715578.png

1726001743385.png
1726001770894.png

1726001840134.png
1726001886227.png
 
I'd choose the Eminence LAB15 over the Dayton any day. There are multiple reasons why.

The Dayton RSS sub has a heavier, less durable aluminum cone (prone to deforming at higher output in smaller sealed boxes). I've heard this myself and its not a pleasant sound.

The Dayton's 2.5" VC can't handle quite as much power as the 3" LAB15 VC. That's not just because of the diameter, but also due to the VC former materials and adhesives Eminence uses.

The LAB15 is also more of a musical sub than the RSS390HO.

That new Ultimax II driver has a very high Qts and overall doesn't sound very accurate, even compared to the Dayton RSS390HO. It looks impressive though from a build quality perspective.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tube Radio
View attachment 1421700
The right (with the +20dB honking upper peak and -3dB at 20Hz)

No ONE listens to a SUBwoofer without a low pass filter, hence...

1739490284259.png


Whatever frequencies above the low pass filter doesn't matter.

I believe someone on this forum made the statement about they stopped trying to make a SUBwoofer be a MIDBASS driver too.

Also, I only used 100hz low pass filter on the BP4 for apples to apples comparison to the sealed enclosure.

9 out of 10 times, folks are going to use an 80hz low pass filter on a SUBwoofer.