Can there be too much passive radiator surface?

@Randy Bassinga ive been messing around with this(number of passive radiators) and the mmp(mass added) to observe what these guys are describing to us.its quite interesting
It is. But so are the claims of car bodies acting as PR and such in other threads. Maybe Steel sheet metal cabs by that logic?

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Front pressure = back pressure. Assuming the driver had an appropriate suspension for proper cone behavior, (Probably a free air driver here since the balloon provides no, or little suspension) I think that the balloon would expand/contract so easily it would sound like there were no balloon there at all- The back pressure would be generated in equal quantity to the front pressure, and you would get all of the position specific bass cancellation you would get it the driver were just hanging in free air. Now if you can just delay the back pressure so it matches the phase of the front pressure, and direct it in a better direction you would have something, which is what labyrinth/maze speaker enclosures do.
I recall an article in the long defunct ‘Speaker Builder’ magazine, where the walls of DIY speaker cabinet were mounted to a space frame via highly elastic supports, enabling them to resonate as panels, and move a significant volume of air. Rendering all the wall panels to function as passive radiators. No doubt, tuning all of the walls to the same, and proper frequency would not have been easy, along with other practical flaws. However, it was an interesting concept.

Does the cube have less of this cancellation over the sphere? Kettle drums and cajun drums do not seem to suffer cancellations but rather sympathetic reverb adding to the struck skin
 
Regarding the thread starter question "Can there be too much passive radiator surface?", the answer is yes.
Too much Sd requires too much PR weight to tune low enough to be useful.
Can the use of dynamat be useful? In the way it damps the HF and seems to be augmenting LF output in the discussions on why the car sub was so loud? A dynamat and rubber sheet cab over a frame? Akin to the duct tape damped kick skins but on all sides except for the base and baffle
 
If you accept non-equal sharing of resonator excursion a non-equal free air resonance frequency of several PRs is no problem. The complete system will still have one tuning frequency.
I really can't speak from education on this, but intuition from developing composite tapers says that the system resonant frequency would be dependent on amplitude and will shift with the power of the input

Which leads me to now imagine a rubber cone as the cab, filled with stuffing to keep shape and driver at the entrance. Would this rear output reflect and delay of the room walls and add to the driver? Capped or uncapped cone end?

No, not too many cones talking 😀
 
Does the cube have less of this cancellation over the sphere? Kettle drums and cajun drums do not seem to suffer cancellations but rather sympathetic reverb adding to the struck skin

In the posit about a driver mounted in the opening of a balloon, the cancellation is not from the shape of the balloon, but the fact that the surface of the balloon would expand and contract with so little resistance that it would be as if there were no balloon at all, allowing the out of phase back wave to escape the balloon enclosure. The cancellation is from the front wave and back wave both being available to your ear, varying in phase dependent upon your location. Directly in front of or behind the speaker would avail less of the opposite phase and have more bass, positions beside the speaker would allow pressure waves of opposite phase to reach your ears simultaneously, more or less cancelling.

A sphere would be a perfect pressure vessel for containing a speaker. Spheres are typically used in pressure vessels, because a sphere will not undergo structural deformation, but rather only material deformation under pressure. What I mean is that a cube subjected to pressure will want to bloat, a structural deformation where the structure bends and attempts to change shape to be closer to spheroid. A sphere is already in the perfect shape to rule out any change in structural shape, but attempts to inflate, which would try to stretch or compress the material itself, which is much harder to do than to bow a flat material. I have seen speakers enclosed in spheres, and they are rather stylish, but impractical to manufacture.

I don't think the body of a rigid drum reverberates. I know a bell will, but it is struck from the side. Aren't kettle drums sealed?
 
What I mean is that a cube subjected to pressure will want to bloat, a structural deformation where the structure bends and attempts to change shape to be closer to spheroid
This is one of the movements that I was pondering about to exploit to add to the output rather than damp with braces or super rigid panels

A sphere is already in the perfect shape to rule out any change in structural shape, but attempts to inflate, which would try to stretch or compress the material itself
This is the movement that I mentioned with the balloon

There is reverb in some drum shells. I have a prized kick, an old two-tone lacquered Legend that I shortened and tuned to a very dry short dub type kick sound. This doesn't use a shell wrap, so the reverb in shell can be clearly felt. There is a difference in the sound of a clay and metal hand drums of similar sizes, one can tell which is which. While a double bass doesn't have a struck skin, it surfaces do act as a speaker

Makes me wonder how would a double bass body go as a cab for a decent lil 8"