• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

New take on the iron Concertina

As I have two LL1667 5mA lying in my box, I thought of giving them a chance in the concertina, for a 15W 6B4G PPP for my 414-8A midbass 60-350Hz. With coils in opposite phase 15mA is max. Would be great if it worked as planned as there will be less problems with max swing compared with a conventinal inverted concertina with the available 270V B+. Will try to find a suitable low Cin MOSFET if the 2540 isn´t good enough. Driver before the concertina is a trioded 6E5P.

Could anyone please do a sanity check of the circuit. Sims good, but you can not see what will happen at higher frequencies. Tried to get capacitance and K figures from Lundahl, but they couldn´t help me.
 

Attachments

  • 1731054180453.png
    1731054180453.png
    50.8 KB · Views: 123
  • ironconcertina.asc
    ironconcertina.asc
    2.5 KB · Views: 66
Trying the same concept with direct coupled PMOS Concertina, for rebuilding my monoblocks, with no luck, as it starts clipping at ca 15V on one side. Works well below 15V in. 10mA standing current.

Any clues?

1731067900725.png
 
Last edited:
Something feels wrong here. Wouldn't this be electrically equivalent to a PP output stage operating with the same signal on both grids...?
I've been wrong before but I think this only works of you either flip one coil or use two separate inductors.

Besides, isn't the 1667 a choke with one coil on each leg of the core and no interleaving? Seems like a non-ideal choice, but the modest bandwidth requirements may save the situation.
 
The DC current cancels with the posted connection, but so does the AC.
This is a tricky one, but it works, no question about that. If you turn one coil so both are same phase, strange things happen(3rd image).
I am not able to explain, but nothing wrong with the sims. It is all about how close K you have. If the coils where tightly coupled, you would get big resonances higher up and worse performance of the one with opposite phase. It´s a pity Lundahl don´t have the figures.

My main issue is still why the PMOS version clips?

1731083643680.png


Opposite phase:
1731083243319.png


Same phase:
1731083349620.png
 
Last edited:
Have now made a few more sims and with the coils in phase, distortion figures get better with tight coupling K=0.9996. With K=0.99 they get close to the same whatever phase is used.

From the LTSpice@groups.io:

"K=1 is perfect coupling with no leakage inductance. It is unrealistic.

K=0.99 is a very tightly coupled transformer.

k=0.98 is a good transformer."
 
Last edited:
Have now made a few more sims and with the coils in phase, distortion figures get better with tight coupling K=0.9996. With K=0.99 they get close to the same whatever phase is used.

From the LTSpice@groups.io:

"K=1 is perfect coupling with no leakage inductance. It is unrealistic.

K=0.99 is a very tightly coupled transformer.

k=0.98 is a good transformer."
My LL1668 choke (calculated from measured values) has k= 0.999049.
 
Good point, but that shouldn’t be a problem with coils in opposite phase. When in phase, saturation is said to be 25mA.
Anyway, iron seems to complicate things a lot. Might be better to add more voltage to B+ and go for resistors?
 
The simulator doesn't know about core saturation.
It actually seems to do(or kind of). Simmed at a lot higher signal voltage (45V) and it now showed up. Guess which combination ;-) ? So running them in phase at 5mA is the way to go, the better coupling the less hf peak though. Question is if one could go higher as Fu will be 60-70Hz?
With lower coupling factor 0.9 the opposite phase still works, but Belas figures indicates much higher figures.

1731147333455.png
 
Last edited: