Headphone amplifier based on class AB with feedback

Does anyone know of a good headphone amplifier project or kit that is based on a discrete A/B output stage and includes negative feedback of the output signal in order to reduce crossover distortion? I need something beefy as my target is to drive some demanding planar headphones
 
Last edited:
Just buffer a descent op-amp and it should be plenty for headphones. Or you could throw together a modest "blameless" circuit. I approve your choice of a A/B output. Most "headphone amps" I see on DIYA are over built, poor class-A designs that reflect the limitations of the designer and not any kind of performance. Note that TI makes a number of headphone amp chips (see their web site), but my choice would be to avoid any kind of proprietary parts.
 
The Omicron is the way to go if you ask me. It has a discrete A/B output stage and includes (lots of) negative feedback of the output signal in order to reduce all kinds of distortion. It has been built by many by now and proved to be an excellent headamp on both measurements and audition.

If you need more power, have a look at the Krell KSA-5 clone with my mods. It is not as good as the Omicron, but it can drive normal loudspeakers and sounds pretty decent. The gerbers of the (original) PCBs are available, BTW.
buffer a descent op-amp and it should be plenty for headphones
That's the headlamp that has been floating around for long time. For example, it has been published by Douglas Self in hiss Small Signal Audio Design:

Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11.43.24 AM.png
by Rod Elliott:
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11.45.11 AM.png
by Silicon Chip and Everyday Practical Electronics:
1724255252335.png
and probably by others. It works, but its performance is limited, so don't expect miracles.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lineup
Most "headphone amps" I see on DIYA are over built, poor class-A designs that reflect the limitations of the designer and not any kind of performance.

For portable applications, sure, but for a desktop there are some good reasons to overbuild:
The higher the idle current w.r.t. signal current, the lower the modulation, so that improves temperature stability, transconductance stability, etc. Similarly, stretching the drain voltage as high as practical also reduces the signal amplitude w.r.t. idle Vds.

Even something like 30V rails x 100mA is just 3W, not much in the scheme of things. Or 200mA -- 6W, and could be powered by a phone charger with a suitable boost circuit. A metal case may keep a coffee cup tepid, maybe slightly warm. Too much noise? Drop a spare 4V across an LM317, and the 400mW will not be noticed.

Optimising by changing a CCS load to a complementary MOSFET seems like a solution to a non-existent problem. And while you are at it, the PSU no longer sees a constant load, but it now has to prevent distorted audio from modulating the rails. So the complexity spirals.
 
The Omicron is the way to go if you ask me. It has a discrete A/B output stage and includes (lots of) negative feedback of the output signal in order to reduce all kinds of distortion. It has been built by many by now and proved to be an excellent headamp on both measurements and audition.

If you need more power, have a look at the Krell KSA-5 clone with my mods. It is not as good as the Omicron, but it can drive normal loudspeakers and sounds pretty decent. The gerbers of the (original) PCBs are available, BTW.

That's the headlamp that has been floating around for long time. For example, it has been published by Douglas Self in hiss Small Signal Audio Design:

View attachment 1347304
by Rod Elliott:
View attachment 1347309
by Silicon Chip and Everyday Practical Electronics:
View attachment 1347310
and probably by others. It works, but its performance is limited, so don't expect miracles.
@alexcp Thanks for posting these circuits. The first two look similar to the Omicron. Is the Omicron superior to these? If so, what do you think makes it better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexcp and lineup
Or something like this, a little simpler and cheaper. Quiescent current is 30mA. It can be more, with a stronger power supply and bigger coolers. A non-inverting schematic can also be used. The power supply is 7815/7915. DC protection is by @miro1360. A higher supply voltage can be used, up to the OPA limit. Other (stronger) output transistors can be used, I had these available in matched pairs. Compensation must be adjusted for each OPA and output transistors (10pF or more). For awkward loads (capacitive) Zobel compensation may have to be added to the output.
 

Attachments

  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    220.2 KB · Views: 113
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    229.1 KB · Views: 82
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    241.8 KB · Views: 86
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    228.6 KB · Views: 114
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    179 KB · Views: 129
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    212.8 KB · Views: 131
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    132.9 KB · Views: 124
Last edited:
The first two look similar to the Omicron
Ah, they all look similar - there is an opamp at the input and a complementary emitter (or source) follower at the output.

The main difference is that the Omicron is a composite amplifier (that is, its two opamps work in a single feedback loop). Because of that, Omicron has at least two orders of magnitute more loop gain and proportionaly less measured distortion. (Thank you @stv!)

There is a school of thought that says the amplifier's distortion below a certain threshold is unimportant (inaudible, masked by the distortion of the source/cans/something else, etc.). However, the difference has been very much audible to quite a few people, some of them quoted in the first post of the Omicron thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stv
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lineup and alexcp