how do i improve this mess of an Class A amplifier?

somewhat fixed
1721483629547.png
 
If you get 0.04% distortion in the simulator on ideal components, then in the real world you will get 0.4%. This is a lot for such a complex circuit that works in class A. A few pages earlier, I gave a link to my project of the Hyperbolic amplifier - it contains half as many parts and at the same time produces distortions of 0.01-0.02% when operating in class A. These are measured distortions of the assembled amplifier, and not computer simulations.
I can second this amplifier, I tested on breadboard and clip leads using IRFP140's. good little design and had no problems with it.
 
If you get 0.04% distortion in the simulator on ideal components, then in the real world you will get 0.4%.
Oh for sure there will be differences but I would hesitate to put a blanket figure on it and say its going to be ten times worse. So much depends (in the real build) on layout and track routing and grounding and of course component matching.
somewhat fixed
Somewhat 🙂

You found the collector of Q6 and the resistor to Q4 collector were not even connected electrically. I'm not on my main PC where I have an updated version which I'll post later.

You still have a massive imbalance in input currents, R1 is way to low for a headphone amp where you need only a few milliamps in Class A to supply the load. R2 is far to low and you still need that resistor to Q4 collector.
 
ive set my eyes on the hifiman sundara closed or any other planar headphone and these things need some power the guy at the store said to look for something with like 1to 2 watts of power, i also demo-d them with an fiio k19 but it costs kinda a lot
 
As a first port of call, I'd suggest lateral MOSFETs for the output stage. Some vertical MOSFETs are probably fine, as long as the bias circuit settles to a reasonable current, or has some active control which is harder to do, and the "safe operating area" graph in the datasheet includes a DC trace.

Maybe I'm wrong, but BJTs seem like more trouble than they are worth, at least for the output stage. One nice thing about bipolars is that they make nice cascodes / impedance converters. Say, for instance, you have a long tail pair, and you are trying to drive an output MOSFET, configured as common source. The gate will probably swing around ±1V, and the LTP will distort due to the Early effect (among others) if you attempt to drive it directly. But if you connect a cascode or folded cascode inbetween, the output of your LTP will only swing a few mV.

For low power, ie headphones, you could even use a sacrificial cascode above or below the output device, so the voltage modulation is in a separate device rather than across the output device.
 
It would be pretty limited in its capabilities tbh without some rework, mainly because of the limited current capability of the output stage. Single output devices haven't enough current gain to be driven by Q4 and also the current sink would need more current. Darlington's or FET's might be an answer.
 
I'm not quite sure what you are thinking here. The output impedance of a common emitter stage is high and could not drive a speaker to useful levels. You could make a simple two transistor voltage amplifier with added output stage that could sound good. A single rail AC coupled design would be best and would avoid offset problems that would make a DC design much more complicated.