US Naval pilots "We see UFO everyday for at least a couple of years"

Jump to Latest
#2,464
diyiggy said:
At kennewton: Nah...you just want to believe it as an american zelote. You basicly search the traces where you want to find them to fulfill your belief. Tjat is typically the matrice of the plot. This just means it is compatible with your personnality and so your logic serves..elsewhere. i surmise you had children a religious sided education or with a big present moral when child. Nothing bad. But for me wirhout solid evidence but just stories we stay on the myth side yet. You are in a more evolved Cargo culte.
Click to expand...
Your foolish, and ignorant assumptions and assertions come across rather strongly as projection on your part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shortwave
#2,465
Maybe, excuse me for that, but your illustrations didn't convince me. Don't get me wrong I am a fan fan of what you write with rational on digital audio. There is a method behind it, alas I don't see it when you speak about that thread. So be sure I do not judge you as a personn. Just a feeling I had. I really think you are wrong here, whatever the evil lawer side of things. I am thinking you are the "victim" of a complex (not for me) collateral cutural terestrian thing. And imho a result of neara century of UFO local culture as we, old european people, really understand as at the center of the cultural mixing of thinkings, most american have pain to understand (mostly because they ultimatly do not understand (refinments I mean) the complexity of multi cultures in a small areas than the puritanism lutheriannism of USA hs pain to understand. Nothing wrong, it is a culturian thing but here you ar talking with an historiscist who has a method and has no political, etc, locals, preference. But an holistic view (and yes i see the defzults as well). It is bnot a judgment.
 
Last edited:
#2,466
diyiggy said:
Maybe Pentagone is working in the 51aera zone of a stealth raptor made of drones like the chineese video that splits just before hitting with multiple bombing possibilities : Flyers for the last rave electronic party invitation, strassed chicken, Lyme bed buggs, micro atomioc bombs, mini whisky bottle for the orient ennemies, slips for naturist camps if they invade my western country !

I tell you officially as a good french that was made in Scotland : keep the slips, you can bombard on me the cabins whiskey bottles instead ! We will see later for water ! We can make a deal for spring rolls as well as a mix ! Just avoid Uber Eats, they do not treadle fast enough to fly.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: diyiggy
#2,467

"We see UFO everyday for at least a couple of years"​

Hell yes.

As a techie and former Air Force, myself, pilots, air crews, airborne and ground RADAR operators have "seen" objects forever. The difference, today, reporting a sighting isn't the career killer it once was.

Remember, if an object is seen by two or more vastly different technologies or by a human and some electronic technology, like RADAR, it's likely real.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matsurus
#2,468
I hope you understood the sense of it as english sense of humor 😉.
Have you datas to share ?

Sorry, I should not be be educated but are there proves of E T. and tout ça ? Really ? U mean elswhere than at TV , people N.P. and conspiracy networks ?
 
Last edited:
#2,477
diyiggy said:
Prove it. ( at ronck)
Click to expand...
Your ad hominem attacks, and seemingly obstinate refusal to concede that evidence does exist, leaves no room for discussion. Admittedly, the only acceptable public proof for anyone should be nothing less than to closely examine, and travel in one the craft. Evidence, however, is a different thing than proof. There is substantial evidence regarding the existence of the craft. Seeking to ridicule others as a preemptive tactic to avoid having any discussion on the subject has been the go-to mode of discussion derailment for decades. It was once easy to dismiss the decades of UFO sighting reports by the public as those of mentally unstable individuals. The few brave individuals who made evidence-free eyewitness reports were easily dismissed as irrational. Lately, that dynamic is inverting some. Those who continue to completely dismissive of the subject in the face of increasing evidence, especially that coming from the Pentagon , are beginning to appear irrational themselves. Or, at the least, appear intellectually myopic.

As we all know, the Pentagon has officially confirmed the exisitnace of the bizarre craft. They make no definitive statement about the origin, or pilots, but deemed it important to include the seemingly unnecessary, and shocking, statement that they couldn't rule out an alien origin in their report to Congress. In addition, the Pentagon has verified the multiple IR-video documented fighter intercepts which were 'leaked' to the public. You can absolutely believe they also are in possession of high resolution gun camera photography which they haven't publicly released, as well. Also, there are the Navy's multiple flight officer engagement testimonial accounts supporting the video evidence. It just makes a person appear irrationally closed-minded to pretend there isn't much evidence. Public proof of the craft, no. Public evidence of the craft, yes.

What is lacking is public evidence of the origin, and pilots (if any) of the craft. The craft might be the result of some. beyond, radically advanced physics, and vehicle development program, of human origin. That's a possibility which can't yet be eliminated. It begs the question, however, of why the Pentagon saw it necessary to explicitly include the possibility of an alien origin to the craft in their publicly released summary of the report to Congress. They absolutely did not need to include such a statement, and certainly realized that it would produce further intrigue.
 
Last edited:
#2,478
It's in the Pentagon's best interest to declare possible alien origin especially if it's home made because the perception it's highly advanced keeps the tire kickers at a distance. This way they're free to continue conducting experimental activities unhindered. Nothing but incidental observers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom