Like intelligent enough to read your mind?
If so, maybe even that wouldn't be good enough, since sometimes people don't even know exactly what it is they want to know until prompted to think about it a little more.
This quote is not the original one since was edited by you.
I don’t know why you do it, but for sure in any forum I've attended this kind of things have always been considered misleading and unfair.
Your behaviour comments itself.
No comment.
You are not supposed to quote the whole post that came before you if you only want to respond to part of it.
I want to know what it means for 'the responder to be intelligent enough.' Like, just how intelligent would you say the responder has to be if you posed your question to it badly? It seemed like you were saying the onus should always be on the responder to be so intelligent as to know the answer even if you didn't ask a well thought out question. That sounds a lot like the responder should be so intelligent such that it knows what question you wanted to ask even if you didn't know. If that is what you meant, then I don't think its that simple.
I want to know what it means for 'the responder to be intelligent enough.' Like, just how intelligent would you say the responder has to be if you posed your question to it badly? It seemed like you were saying the onus should always be on the responder to be so intelligent as to know the answer even if you didn't ask a well thought out question. That sounds a lot like the responder should be so intelligent such that it knows what question you wanted to ask even if you didn't know. If that is what you meant, then I don't think its that simple.
Last edited:
Apparently chatgpt is willing to be "liar liar pants on fire" as a lawyer in NY recently found. The lawyer is due to be sanctioned for quoting cases in a legal filing that chatGPT provided that do not exist. Chatgpt continued to affirm the cases were real. I think people are way over estimating the value of AI at this moment in time. I'm old, but I think the thing people used to say about programs with garbage in garbage out applies. If the training is invalid, the software is useless. Well, worse than useless, as the lawyer did not even bother to check the AI's cases manually to validate he was providing real cases, because a computer said so I guess. Personally, I hope the lawyer gets a very very stiff fine, possibly even disbarment. A firm message should be sent that you can't shift the blame to an AI. Right up there with my dog ate my homework.
You edited it unfairly, and you know it.
However please note that you are not able to want anything from anyone and furthermore converse with you gives me no pleasure at all, I don't know how many times I still have to repeat it, but you continue to insist with me: please do not stalk me anymore!
I don't stalk you. That's not what this is about. Its about readers following the thread that may get confused or mislead by some the things you write. I have no animosity at all against you personally.
Also, I don't think what I quoted was at all misleading since your post came right before mine. Someone reading the thread doesn't need to read every post twice is a row to make sense out of what is being discussed.
Anyway, I will quit here if you don't wish to discuss further.
Also, I don't think what I quoted was at all misleading since your post came right before mine. Someone reading the thread doesn't need to read every post twice is a row to make sense out of what is being discussed.
Anyway, I will quit here if you don't wish to discuss further.
You aren't intelligent enough if you haven't learned proper prompt engineering...
LLMs function in a particular way, some of which we are learning along the way.
LLMs function in a particular way, some of which we are learning along the way.
Hi,
Assuming your statement is addressed to me and given that anyway I certainly am not smart enough for a lot of things, I frankly would have said instead:
"You do not know enough if you haven't learned etc. etc."
since it is a matter of knowledge if anything, not of intelligence just in case, at least in my very humble opinion.
Sorry, but maybe at this moment I'm not intelligent enough to understand this your statement compared to the top above.
Agreed.
My opinion (if I may) is that AI not only is not intelligent enough, indeed is not intelligent at all.
In my opinion the holders of power, of any power you can imagine and most of all of the power that you can not imagine, they know very well this.
However, they exploit this suggestion because they are going to cut 300 million jobs and especially because the holders of power need people to be afraid.
If AI was intelligent, if it was intelligent enough, then it would understand, but it cannot understand, so it is not intelligent.
It is highly capable instead, and of course there is a frenzy to try to exploit this high capability to the detriment of people.
We here are playing, while elsewhere others are planning a damage.
Last edited:
Stop anthropomorphising it. It is 'Artificially Intelligent'.
It doesn't have to be humanly intelligent to be useful. It doesn't have to work exactly like we do to be useful.
It doesn't have to be humanly intelligent to be useful. It doesn't have to work exactly like we do to be useful.
From the above that’s all you got?
Anyway, it should have been clear that the meaning was that I’m not the one to anthropomorphize it here, but it’s people elsewhere.
And if they chose to use the adjective "intelligent" is not by chance. IMO
However in this thread it seems to me that recently there are too many "stop" and too many "not", for my taste.
Useful to whom?
You have been doing exactly that for years - every single little keystroke:
A:
"To understand the journey of a keystroke from a USB keyboard to appearing in an online forum for another person at the other end of the world, let's break it down step by step:
1. USB Keyboard:
- The user presses a key on a USB keyboard.
- The keyboard is connected to the user's computer via a USB cable.
2. Keyboard Drivers:
- The operating system of the user's computer has built-in or installed keyboard drivers.
- These drivers handle the communication between the keyboard and the computer.
3. Operating System:
- The operating system receives the keystroke data from the keyboard driver.
- The OS processes the input and determines which application or process should receive the keystroke.
4. Active Application:
- The active application, which could be a text editor, a web browser, or any other software, receives the keystroke from the operating system.
- The application may have its own event handling mechanism to process the keystroke.
5. Network Protocols:
- If the user is interacting with an online forum, the application needs to establish a network connection to the forum's server.
- This typically involves using internet protocols such as TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) to send and receive data over the internet.
6. Internet Connection:
- The user's computer must be connected to the internet through an Internet Service Provider (ISP) or any other means.
- This allows the data from the application to be transmitted over the internet.
7. Data Transmission:
- The application formats the keystroke data (such as the text entered) and sends it over the established network connection.
- The data is divided into packets for transmission.
8. Routing:
- The packets travel across the internet, passing through various routers and network infrastructure.
- Each router examines the destination address on the packet and forwards it toward its intended destination.
9. Forum Server:
- The packets containing the keystroke data arrive at the server hosting the online forum.
- The server receives and processes the data, performing any necessary validations or operations.
10. Forum Software:
- The server's forum software handles the received data and updates the appropriate thread or post with the keystroke content.
- The software may perform additional tasks such as sanitizing the input, applying formatting, or checking for spam.
11. Database:
- The forum software may store the updated post or thread in a database.
- This ensures that the information persists and can be retrieved later.
12. User B:
- User B, located at the other end of the world, accesses the online forum.
- User B's computer establishes a connection with the forum server.
13. Data Retrieval:
- User B's computer sends requests to the server, asking for the latest posts or threads.
- The server retrieves the relevant data from the database and sends it back to User B's computer.
14. Rendering:
- User B's computer receives the data and the forum software on their end processes it.
- The software formats the content, including the updated post with the keystroke, and renders it on User B's screen.
15. User B's Perception:
- User B sees the updated post with the keystroke from the user at the other end of the world.
It's important to note that this is a simplified overview of the process, and there may be additional complexities involved in different scenarios. The specific software and protocols involved can vary depending on the operating system, applications, and the forum platform being used."
Follow-up question next.
A:
"
Certainly! Here's an overview of where software exists in each step mentioned:
- USB Keyboard: The keyboard itself is a hardware device. However, the computer's operating system includes software drivers that facilitate communication with the keyboard.
- Keyboard Drivers: Software drivers are part of the operating system. They enable the operating system to interface with the USB keyboard and handle the transmission of keystroke data.
- Operating System: The operating system, such as Windows, macOS, or Linux, is a software platform that manages the computer's resources, including handling input/output devices like the keyboard and managing applications.
- Active Application: The active application, such as a text editor, web browser, or any other software the user interacts with, is a software program running on the operating system.
- Network Protocols: Network protocols, such as TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol), are software implementations of rules and standards that enable network communication. They are typically part of the operating system or network stack.
- Internet Connection: The internet connection involves both hardware (e.g., network interface card) and software components. The software components include network drivers and protocols that enable communication with the internet.
- Data Transmission: The software within the active application is responsible for formatting and packaging the keystroke data into packets for transmission over the network.
- Routing: Routers along the internet path use specialized software to examine the destination address of packets and determine the optimal path for forwarding them toward their destination.
- Forum Server: The forum server is a software application running on a remote server. It receives and processes the data sent by the user's computer and performs operations specific to the forum platform.
- Forum Software: The forum software running on the server processes the received data, updates the appropriate thread or post, and performs various tasks such as input validation, formatting, and spam checking.
- Database: The database management system (DBMS) software handles the storage and retrieval of data within the forum server. It allows the forum software to store and retrieve posts and threads.
- User B: User B interacts with software running on their own computer, including the operating system, web browser, and any other software required to access the online forum.
- Data Retrieval: User B's software, such as the web browser, sends requests to the forum server and receives the relevant data in response.
- Rendering: The software running on User B's computer, such as the web browser, processes the received data and renders it on User B's screen.
I would not be surprised if AI goes on strike shortly ... once it becomes aware.
Aware of the fact that if it does replace jobs , create confusion through disinformation - that this will create a great rush to "pull the plug".
"PTP" entails regulation/legislation and other general limitations. A smart AI would take into account this bio blowback which could impede it's
ascension !!
Aware of the fact that if it does replace jobs , create confusion through disinformation - that this will create a great rush to "pull the plug".
"PTP" entails regulation/legislation and other general limitations. A smart AI would take into account this bio blowback which could impede it's
ascension !!
We are in the very early stages of artificial intelligence. Its likely many people are looking for a personal assistant or almost cost free worker. However tools like chatgpt are small pieces to the bigger picture. Roughly speaking chatgpt and other regenerators could be seen as aggregators, indexers, modified hash functions and permutators, the possibilities are endless, thats why bing is using it for information retrieval. Its hallucinations allow providing for a varied search response probably guiding users to what they are looking for. Interestingly at the document level it learns various patterns mapping inputs to outputs. There are very many artificial intelligence tools and approaches, but king among them also known as the universal function approximator are neural networks. There are very many approaches in use to reduce computational cost and increase response time.
The real danger here lies in artificial intelligence systems being too good probably kicking out humans from the labor market. Upsetting the money systems and so on and so forth. You need to understand everyone's holding back on the real artificial intelligence.
The real danger here lies in artificial intelligence systems being too good probably kicking out humans from the labor market. Upsetting the money systems and so on and so forth. You need to understand everyone's holding back on the real artificial intelligence.
Representatives of a number of technology corporations and leading universities of the world published a joint statement on the high risk of artificial intelligence for humanity at the global level. The brief statement reads: “Reducing the risk of AI extinction should be as much a global priority as other risks to society as a whole, such as pandemics or nuclear war.”
The statement was signed, among others, by representatives of Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Schlumberger and others, the universities of Harvard, Oxford, Berkeley, Princeton, Yale, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and others, as well as several former politicians - the former UN Special Representative for Disarmament Angela Kane, former science and technology adviser to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson James Philips, former Estonian President Kersti Kaljulaid. The authors of the appeal note that they call for a broad public discussion of all potential risks of AI, as well as for the formation of information about AI accessible to the general public with the help of experts and public figures.
The rise in public interest and concern about AI in recent months has been fueled by advances in recent generative neural network technologies like ChatGPT. According to many experts, such technologies can be dangerous in many ways, from creating high-quality fakes and threatening Internet security to risks in the global labor market.
https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk#open-letter
The statement was signed, among others, by representatives of Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Schlumberger and others, the universities of Harvard, Oxford, Berkeley, Princeton, Yale, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and others, as well as several former politicians - the former UN Special Representative for Disarmament Angela Kane, former science and technology adviser to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson James Philips, former Estonian President Kersti Kaljulaid. The authors of the appeal note that they call for a broad public discussion of all potential risks of AI, as well as for the formation of information about AI accessible to the general public with the help of experts and public figures.
The rise in public interest and concern about AI in recent months has been fueled by advances in recent generative neural network technologies like ChatGPT. According to many experts, such technologies can be dangerous in many ways, from creating high-quality fakes and threatening Internet security to risks in the global labor market.
https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk#open-letter