Mark Levinson 26 calibration

Hello,
I just bought a ML 26 with internal MC phono stage, which I've been dreaming about for the past 2 years 😀
It works flawlessly so I'm just doing regular maintenance, replacing electrolytic caps and checking that voltages are ok. Does anyone know the calibration procedure for this preamp? There are several trimpots in the regulator section, line stage and phono stage.
Thanks
 
you're right 😅
attached are the schematics. there's two pots each on the negative and positive regulators, and two pots on the line stage.
 

Attachments

  • ML26_Neg_regulator.jpg
    ML26_Neg_regulator.jpg
    170.9 KB · Views: 321
  • ML26_Opamp.jpg
    ML26_Opamp.jpg
    370.5 KB · Views: 295
  • ML26_Pos_regulator.jpg
    ML26_Pos_regulator.jpg
    172.4 KB · Views: 260
  • ML26_Power.jpg
    ML26_Power.jpg
    285 KB · Views: 267
Pot(s) I2 in each regulator would be used to trim the +/- 17V outputs to their respective nominal voltages. Also, each regulator has a bias spreader, adjusted via I7. Push/pull archetecture is very unusual for a purported power supply regulator. This, and the quandary of how to adjust I7, prompted me to dig a little deeper.

IMHO, the posted schematic is probably a DIY effort to reverse engineer a schematic. A great effort, but I believe there is an error in the depicted bias spreader circuit. If the circuit were as depicted, the voltage across C5 would be about 5V--- enough to drive output complimentary pair into massive conduction. But if you measure the voltage across C5, I predict you'll find a bit over 0.6V. In short, the I7 pot won't have much effect and you shouldn't worry about it.
 
Pot(s) I2 in each regulator would be used to trim the +/- 17V outputs to their respective nominal voltages. Also, each regulator has a bias spreader, adjusted via I7. Push/pull archetecture is very unusual for a purported power supply regulator. This, and the quandary of how to adjust I7, prompted me to dig a little deeper.

IMHO, the posted schematic is probably a DIY effort to reverse engineer a schematic. A great effort, but I believe there is an error in the depicted bias spreader circuit. If the circuit were as depicted, the voltage across C5 would be about 5V--- enough to drive output complimentary pair into massive conduction. But if you measure the voltage across C5, I predict you'll find a bit over 0.6V. In short, the I7 pot won't have much effect and you shouldn't worry about it.
You are right that the resistor values are odd and must be dead wrong.
But ML uses push/pull topology in many amps, like for instance in the ML 300 series.
See attachment where you see large differences between upper and lower resistance values in the endstage.
One transistor is supplying the current and the other one is a sort of ripple eater.

Hans
 

Attachments

  • ML No336_Current Gain-Voltage Regulator (2).jpg
    ML No336_Current Gain-Voltage Regulator (2).jpg
    154 KB · Views: 189
Thanks! Interesting.

I'm guessing the "-REG" connects to the output, but it hooks up off-screen somewhere? I wonder what is the intent of the push-pull drive with the wildly (100x) unbalanced emitter resistors?
 
Pot(s) I2 in each regulator would be used to trim the +/- 17V outputs to their respective nominal voltages. Also, each regulator has a bias spreader, adjusted via I7. Push/pull archetecture is very unusual for a purported power supply regulator. This, and the quandary of how to adjust I7, prompted me to dig a little deeper.

IMHO, the posted schematic is probably a DIY effort to reverse engineer a schematic. A great effort, but I believe there is an error in the depicted bias spreader circuit. If the circuit were as depicted, the voltage across C5 would be about 5V--- enough to drive output complimentary pair into massive conduction. But if you measure the voltage across C5, I predict you'll find a bit over 0.6V. In short, the I7 pot won't have much effect and you shouldn't worry about it.
Ok I checked the voltages. Actually voltage across C5 is around 5V. Anything I should do with the pot I7?
I used pot I2 to set the +/-17V, except on one channel where moving the pot doesn’t affect the voltage on the negative regulator. However the voltage is 17.1V so I can leave it as is or is it a weird behavior and need further investigation?
 
Actually, it seems that everything is a bit weird, and I believe it needs to be understood, at minimum. Do you see any evidence that the preamp has been "serviced" before?

I've never even seen a ML device before; I can only project what should happen from looking at the schematic, and there's unconfirmed suspicion that the schematic may not be correct. I assume you observe about 5V across C5 in both regulators? What are the unregulated supply voltages for each regulator?

I hope a DIY owner will confirm what constitutes nominal operating voltages and installed part values. Would you post a few internal pictures?

I'll comment on what I observe in the schematic. The 14k and 8.87k resistors are consistent with 17V supplies derived from 6.6V Zeners, so that's promising. Focusing on the -17V regulator, the 3.48k,100 Ohm pot, 383 Ohm string is baffling; assuming Vbe is 0.6V, the bias spreader voltage across C5 would be at least 5.91V. Again on the -17V supply, would you report voltages re ground on:

Vsupply
C5, both top and bottom terminals
I2 pot, all three terminals
base of MAT02 at R1

Maybe that will help determine what's happening.

Thanks!
 
Ok, I will check more precisely all those voltages and report back to you. For now I can tell you that the preamp has been serviced about 10 years ago by a “reputable” technician here in Italy, but honestly I don’t like the job he did. He replaced all 68uF sprague capacitors with 100uF ones for no reason, and replaced the original squared sprague capacitors on the power supply with general purpose Vishay ones. Plus some solder joints did not look great. But overall the amp worked and sounded well when I got it. I replaced the original sprague capacitors (NOS and measured perfectly in every aspect) and all original values capacitors. As far as the schematics, the resistor values I checked so far are all correct, but didn’t check them all yet. I will post detailed photos. The ~5V across C5 is for both positive and negative regulators, on both channels (it’s a dual mono design).
Regarding the channel whit the negative regulator issue I mentioned, actually the pot does work, but it needs to be turned all the way to reach -17.2, if I move it from there I can only go more negative. It’s ok because I can set the proper voltage but the adjustable range is not correct
 
I agree. I paid 400$ for four NOS ones. Crazy but in the end well worth it sound wise, they are the only caps that make the 28 and 26 really sing, I’ve tried a few alternatives. The sprague seem really indestructible, capacitance is all +10-20% than specified, ESR unmeasurable with my peak meter (0.00 ohms), even after 20-30 years on the shelf. They don’t make such components anymore.
 
Actually, it seems that everything is a bit weird, and I believe it needs to be understood, at minimum. Do you see any evidence that the preamp has been "serviced" before?

I've never even seen a ML device before; I can only project what should happen from looking at the schematic, and there's unconfirmed suspicion that the schematic may not be correct. I assume you observe about 5V across C5 in both regulators? What are the unregulated supply voltages for each regulator?

I hope a DIY owner will confirm what constitutes nominal operating voltages and installed part values. Would you post a few internal pictures?

I'll comment on what I observe in the schematic. The 14k and 8.87k resistors are consistent with 17V supplies derived from 6.6V Zeners, so that's promising. Focusing on the -17V regulator, the 3.48k,100 Ohm pot, 383 Ohm string is baffling; assuming Vbe is 0.6V, the bias spreader voltage across C5 would be at least 5.91V. Again on the -17V supply, would you report voltages re ground on:

Vsupply
C5, both top and bottom terminals
I2 pot, all three terminals
base of MAT02 at R1

Maybe that will help determine what's happening.

Thanks!
Ok here are the measurements:
Vsupply +/- 28.8V on one channel and +/- 29.6V on the other

C5 top terminal -16.12V bottom terminal -21.95V (Other channel -16.66V and -21.61V, respectively).
I2 Top terminal: -6.28V (other channel -6.34V); central terminal: -6.99V (other channel -6.88V); bottom terminal: -6.99V (other channel -7.02V).
Base of MAT02 at R1: -6.98V (other channel -6.88V).
Everything seems simmetrical so far except in order to get -17V on one channel pot I2 is turned all the way while on the other is turned half way.
I attach a few pictures.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2129.jpeg
    IMG_2129.jpeg
    531.2 KB · Views: 201
  • IMG_2128.jpeg
    IMG_2128.jpeg
    539.3 KB · Views: 153
  • IMG_2127.jpeg
    IMG_2127.jpeg
    677.8 KB · Views: 179
  • IMG_2126.jpeg
    IMG_2126.jpeg
    705.1 KB · Views: 178
Pretty equipemnt.

I've come to believe that ML actually intends the unusually large base spreader voltage, so I think you don't need to do anything. I doubt the exact voltage at the -17V regulator is critical--- just stable, low noise regulation is the likely objective. It you want to trim the -17V supply to nominal, decrease the 14K resistor appropriately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stefanocipo87