3 way MEH with 1.4" CD - 3D print and CNC

Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Since I have recently acquired the wonderful Beyma CP755Nd 1.4" drivers, I started planning a large MEH with them. 3 way, single flare (with the option to add a secondary flare). Mids will be 4x Faital Pro 3FE22s and the LF 2 x BC 10CL51s. The LF might be also a single 15" (if it can fit the horn), since I have two Eminence Deltalite II units at my disposal.

The 3D (80 x 60 dispersion) model shows the entry part with driver flange for 3D printing. I yet have to try more options here - it needs to fit my printer. This part can be also left out and replaced by plywood in a more traditional way of building these.

1645552574662.png


This is going to be a long term project for the next year or two I think:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
The project is moving ahead slowly. I am creating a fully parametric model in OpenSCAD for the plywood conical part, so that I can generate the STL or STEP parts with just a few clicks for different sizes, angles and driver mounting options.

I need to measure the influence of the chamber and port on the mid driver to find a good placement for the port holes and then a lot of simulations in Hornresp to define the horn part dimensions.
 
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Another teaser. I just had to cut the adaptor from some 10mm plywood. Now it will be glued and later finished with a ball nose end mill.
 

Attachments

  • 99288340-5F60-4F9B-AB65-5AA00AF32C73.jpeg
    99288340-5F60-4F9B-AB65-5AA00AF32C73.jpeg
    457.2 KB · Views: 126
  • DFAE662A-3633-4885-8DFE-9114D404E936.jpeg
    DFAE662A-3633-4885-8DFE-9114D404E936.jpeg
    594.9 KB · Views: 122
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Looking good pelanj !

It's cool you can make adapters like that. Not something i know how to do yet.

I'm sure you've figured out the name of the game, with the top-mounted lows, is figuring out the H vs V pattern and overall size of the horn, that let's the drivers fit underneath the lid.
Well, that's been the game for me at least, because i use the lid to seal them in without another box around the entire horn. Just saving weight :)
My 36" x 22" syn10's with their 90x60 pattern weigh only 49 lbs ! ---(with 2 10"s, 4 4"s, and CD.)
 
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Your way of mounting the woofers was the main driver for making the parametric model - I find it really smart. Now I can try different options and watch for collisions - like the one in the picture. I will do some simulations in Hornresp with suitable woofers to decide later on the final dimensions. It is a long term project, I am still not fully decided if the HF will be a CD or the big Heil AMT. Most probably, I will build both as prototypes from chipboard or OSB and decide based on the outcome.
 
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
I realized that I can use just two 10 mm layers to make the adapter shorter. And the first one was slightly smaller than it should be, so I could not fit the mounting screws easily through.
 

Attachments

  • 759E4C2D-6644-4507-A994-F70699D427DF.jpeg
    759E4C2D-6644-4507-A994-F70699D427DF.jpeg
    266.4 KB · Views: 126
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Without using any tricks, the largest enclosure that would fit my CNC using 600 mm wide flooring panels would only house a 12" - a 80x70 deg with a mouth of ca 800 x 690 mm. The sealed volume with a 12CL64 will result in Q around 0.8 and fs slightly below 150 Hz with f3 around 125 Hz. Now it is time to feed the numbers to Hornresp.
 
This is how I plan to split the largest boards. I will keep all the other below 800 mm max dimension. That wil allow to fit in a 15". Although the volume seems to be a bit too small for the Deltalite.

View attachment 1118353
I think small volume can keep the low driver from reaching down as far as desired. I found reflex ports on syn8 worked well and were easy to implement.
(syn8 uses same top and bottom low driver mount strategy)
 
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Here should be the hornresp model of one of the build candidates. HF will be Beyma CP755Nd, mids 4x FaitalPro 3FE22s and LF a single BC 12CL64. I tried to add BR ports, but it did not look like I expected, there was a deep notch - I must have done something wrong there.
 

Attachments

  • MEH-LF.txt
    2.7 KB · Views: 86
  • MEH-MID.txt
    2.7 KB · Views: 83
  • MEH-HF.txt
    2.7 KB · Views: 74
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
And now I know what have I done wrong. I was watching Power 3, I should have selected Total Power, where the new "Combined" option appeared:) It seems that with the BR, I should be able to reach easily below 100 Hz with a single 12CL64. And I think I will just go for the no-compromise 4NDF34s, unfortunately, to get 4 pieces, I will have to order from abroad, there are only two in stock now in CZ.
 
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
Interesting your using open SCAD, I have a pretty silly workflow for calculated shapes involving Octave and a Fusion360 python import script, perhaps I could simplify my workflow. 3FE22 is a decent driver for MEH mid I have been running 4 per side of the ferrite version for PA for a few years and have enough output to keep up with a 15" midbass and 1" comp.
 
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Yes, TLHP will most probably be the source, but I will most probably wait until January anyway.

OpenSCAD is quite handy for the parametric stuff. I found it easier to use than FreeCAD. The script is far from finished and not documented at all, but I can share it for inspiration if someone is interested.

There is a really cool looking library called "Round everything" - I yet have to install it and learn how to use it, but for flat beveled panels produced as STL for machining it is not needed. And another nice thing is, that the project file can be directly imported into FreeCAD as well and one can have a multibody STEP file in no time.
 
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
I also did not give up thinking about the single 15" bass version. I think I found an easy way to add more volume - basically rotate the horn 90 degrees and add a square bottom. The 15" would be mounted from the bottom, the midranges from the top. I wonder if there are any significant drawbacks having the taps placed asymmetrically.