Investments/Stocks/Funds

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is an acronym?
Please clarify.

Also, we are looking forward to a big correction in real estate values, elderly people have borrowed against their equity for living expenses, and the banks show it as minimal risk.
There is no hope of the loan being paid off by a retired person, it will become the liability of the next owner, and some areas are simply not popular.
But the banks show it as an asset.
What happens when all the properties in the same area start to go on sale....the excrement will hit the fan.
 
Actually not a acronym...Latin!

Value of FIAT Currency is what the backing Government says it is worth - not backed by Gold/Silver/assets.

Also, we are looking forward to a big correction in real estate values
I donno 'bout this - home prices are a bit inflated due to hyper demand, but rising interest rates and lessons learned in 2008 will temper its effect (methinks)
 
Last edited:
Thanks.

We are also seeing some oil producers refusing to accept dollars, and insisting on alternate currencies.
The US Dollar's importance in the world economy is because of its status as the 'Petro-Dollar', as all trade in oil is conducted in dollars.
If that ceases, the Dollar will not be very attractive.
That is the long term goal of some oil producers...bear that in mind also.
 
This, and the above post, are mildly against forum rules, in that politics and names are used, just as examples.

The Swiss company Nestle used to have 97% of its sales outside Switzerland, so before investing, its performance in major markets must be considered.
Suzuki sells about 5 times its Japanese sales in India, and gets a huge amount as royalties from its Indian operations.
Again, it may be an attractive investment, though it may not be a stellar performer in Japan.

These names are used as examples, just to advise caution when choosing investment targets, as we live in an increasingly complex and globalized economy.
 
Oil is usually traded in USD as it is the most stable currency on the planet. Those that are not selling oil via USD (Russia, China, some in Middle East - ya know, all those countries that just LOVE the US) are trying to delegitimize the USD, which only hurts them...(again, methinks)
 
  • Like
Reactions: analog_sa
The Dollar is based on smoke and mirrors, and it is time somebody said the Emperor has no clothes.

The US has paid its import bills for decades in T-Bills, essentially deferred promissory notes, and the only reason they have not been called in is that the Dollar would become worthless, and so would their T Bills.

Just see how much T-Bills are held, and by which country.
Again, this is going very political, so leave it be.

Moderators, your call.
 
I remember seeing an article that China and India are the world's two largest oil importers.
So if these and other countries choose to buy oil in currencies other than dollars, what happens? The dollar has no relevance in the transaction.
They can do the payment in any mutually agreeable currency, or commodity...
 
Last edited:
I have a distant relative in Toronto, whose house mortgage has gone from C$150k (1976) to C$2000k now as he has borrowed against his equity for daily expenses.
He is 85, and the house is now in a not so popular area, he will be lucky to get 1500k.
Who will bear the loss after he passes?

He does not have sufficient other assets to reimburse the bank in the event that there is a loss on disposal of the property.
The bank, or insurance company will take a hit.

Multiply that by 2 million events in North America, and think about it.
 
Last edited:
The $US is a commodity that is traded on the open market. There are currency markets around the world and I'm talking about exchanges like the CBOT. Its value is determined largely by supply and demand. For decades there has been robust demand because as mentioned it is the preferred currency for buying oil on the open market. So Uncle Sam can create a whole bunch of $$$ without runaway inflation because just like Toyotas, there's always a ready amount of buyers for however many are produced.

This convenient setup was brought to us by Tricky Dick Nixon, whose conniving deals ended the free fall of the $US on the world market and "stagflation" at home.
 
Hoping for some tips on general investment etc.

I'll get to the point shortly, but first:
I just recently got enrolled in a education program run by the government that seeks to further educate people with a mainly practical background.
Decided to go for a engineering degree in Electronics as that's basicly the only thing I'm able to apply for, and it's also one of the few things I have interest it.
After I got my acceptance letter not long ago they told me I was eligible for a loan, parts of this loan may turn into a sort of scholarship allowance of sorts upon passing the studies.
This loan has a very low interest rate of currently 1.67%, and is a reliable low interest solution that the government uses to make sure people get a proper education.

I am seriously considering taking that loan, and putting all of it in various stocks and funds. The market is at a low now, but even if it starts going back up a bit before I get the first sum in mid-august I should still be able to "hitch a ride" a bit further up. The plan: If I am able to plan my way in the market "just so" it is possible I could repay a reasonable bit of my mortgage and still have a bit left after fulfilling my education in 3-4 years time.
Even though I am not guaranteed that the loan will turn into "school funds" I am still guaranteed a very low interest rate, so my thinking is that a well-planned portfolio should be well worth it.

Is this a bad idea?

I am concidering spreading it over a few specific tech companies, some stable dividend stocks and something in agriculture.

Thoughts and opinions are welcome.
I have not read your entire post. I will just say that you should invest in something which will yield more income than inflation and taxes will take away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NareshBrd
I already said Thanks, no need to flog a dead horse...

Fiat Money = Decree money, and Fiat Vehicles = Instruments based on Fiat money.

You are looking at a turbulent and transient global situation, the balance of power will shift from the current stake holders, simply because manufacturing capability and age are against them.
Britain, compare it to its glory days in the Post War era.
Most of Europe too.
Elderly people are not going to spend money as fast, most are on retirement planning.

Be cautious, and try to appreciate your assets in the long term.

Again, mildly political content as examples.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.