We know very well what it takes to get a planet to the point where multicellular life can emerge - whatever form it takes.
‘We don’t know’ therefore we’ll assume there’s aliens doesn’t wash.
I do wish people would do a bit of basic reading and research- not watch ‘Ancient Alien’ rubbish and fraudster’s like Nick Pope. There are many very academic YouTube videos on astronomy, biology, astrobiology and planetary science that help put this type of discussion in perspective.
All we get from the alien proponents are grainy videos, innuendo and highly improbable and implausible theories as to why there’s no hard evidence for their existence.
Last edited:
Then, I suppose, you would have to classify the Pentagon as an alien proponent then. For verifying leaked UFO vehicle related fighter squadron grainy video, as well as having released Navy pilot’s to freely speak about these bizarre encounters. While none of that necessarily equals, Mr. A. Lien, it is, at the very least, highly intriguing.
The Pentagon aren’t claiming there are aliens about to invade, or the galaxy is teeming with alien civilisations. They are simply saying they don’t have any proof either way and this whole thing needs investigation.
"Hey Russia/China, we may or may not have alien tech. We may or may not already train with it, here's some videos. Might be fake, but what if they're real?"
More outrageous conspiracy theories? ‘We have alien tech’. Really?
Why would an alien civilisation interact with us the way people claim? They would have supposedly found a way to bridge the distances between stars - the nearest one 4 LY away! What would they do here? Study us like ants? Steal our planet from us? Much easier to mine a dead planet like Mars or Mercury. No pathogens, nothing to put up a fight. If they were that advanced, terraforming would be a breeze anyway.
Sorry, I don’t buy it. It’s highly likely that’s it’s just us in the Milky Way. As Fermi asked, if not, where is everybody?
Why would an alien civilisation interact with us the way people claim? They would have supposedly found a way to bridge the distances between stars - the nearest one 4 LY away! What would they do here? Study us like ants? Steal our planet from us? Much easier to mine a dead planet like Mars or Mercury. No pathogens, nothing to put up a fight. If they were that advanced, terraforming would be a breeze anyway.
Sorry, I don’t buy it. It’s highly likely that’s it’s just us in the Milky Way. As Fermi asked, if not, where is everybody?
While the Pentagon didn’t declare that these vehicles are being controlled by aliens, they did specifically state that neither were they ruling out that possibility. Now, critically analyze the wording of the Pentagon’s statement. You can be quite certain that every single word of the statement was very carefully considered before release. I think it an astonishing concession that they specifically mention not ruling out an alien origin for the vehicles. They didn’t have to say that they weren’t ruling out alien visitors. They could have simply made no reference to aliens is their statement, so why didn’t they say nothing?
Set aside theorizing about alien pilots for the moment. The overwhelming evidence of the existence of the vehicles themselves is astonishing enough, no matter who, or what is in control of them. The vehicles not only represent a mind-blowing advance in technology, but in our fundamental (mis)understanding of physics. I suggest that who are the pilots, may not even be the most pressing question.
Last edited:
It was still odd. UAPs were described once as a potential threats and multiple times as just threats. They were also anticipated to be physical objects:
Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, to include radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation.
while leaving open the possibility of atmospheric phenomena. Overall an empty report seasoned with the spice of mystery to keep the public's interest.
‘Overwhelming evidence’. Seriously?
Please show the overwhelming evidence. What evidence? Grainy videos? USAF pilots saying ‘it was not of this world’. You want to see my wife when she loses it bud. That warrants a ‘not of this world’ label not the stuff dished up as evidence of alien contact.
Overwhelming evidence would be a large portion of a craft or a whole craft, alien bodies, messages, clear photos and videos- after all everyone has a decent mobile phone nowadays right? And there’s no way any government could hush stuff like this up if it was on the scale some claim.
Please show the overwhelming evidence. What evidence? Grainy videos? USAF pilots saying ‘it was not of this world’. You want to see my wife when she loses it bud. That warrants a ‘not of this world’ label not the stuff dished up as evidence of alien contact.
Overwhelming evidence would be a large portion of a craft or a whole craft, alien bodies, messages, clear photos and videos- after all everyone has a decent mobile phone nowadays right? And there’s no way any government could hush stuff like this up if it was on the scale some claim.
Last edited:
They would have a much better time in the Oort cloud, for mining. We don't have anything of interest. What, water? Which is made from 1st and 3rd most abundant elements in the universe. And they'd also get some energy out of making water for themselves. Aliens coming here for water have to be the stupidest advanced alien race in the whole observable universe.
As far as space mining goes gravity wells are for suckers.
If there's aliens watching us, clearly they're monitoring the internet as it's a treasure of info. So if they're doing it, then doesn't it make sense they'd be interested in what we think about them? I mean I'd prioritize some attention to discussions between the aliens I'm surveilling , if they're talking about humans (their aliens), on their internet. So then, there is that chance that they'll come across this thread, at some point.
Anything we wish to tell them?
Yes, I’m aware that the only thing you would take as evidence is if a fleet of UFO vehicles landed at the U.N., and even then, you would likely confidently declare that was a hoax.
Again, I’m not talking about evidence for alien visitation, or pilots. I’m talking about evidence for the vehicles. To deny there is evidence for the vehicles, admittedly without proof of origin, requires a completely closed mind it would seem. The vehicles alone represent a radically radical advancement over what we presently believe is even physically possible.
Again, I’m not talking about evidence for alien visitation, or pilots. I’m talking about evidence for the vehicles. To deny there is evidence for the vehicles, admittedly without proof of origin, requires a completely closed mind it would seem. The vehicles alone represent a radically radical advancement over what we presently believe is even physically possible.
