• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

RJM 6DJ8 phono section

Jump to Latest
#21
The RJM Audio website has moved. The information on the 6DJ8 phono project can be found here.

RJM Audio is me. The design of this phono stage is my own, in the sense that I worked out and simulated the RIAA values for the circuit, the operating points for the tubes etc. The "two triodes, passive filter, no feedback" phono circuit is generic and goes way back.
 
#24
sonata149 said:
Has anyone built and listened critically to this circuit? Is it worthwile and has anyone improved its performance with CCS etc?

Regards,
JA
Click to expand...

Well, the simplicity is nice, but it is very old school, were the pros and cons of NFB was not clear (are they clear these days?). Though I admit it is tempting b/c of it's simplicity, and since the NFB is only around a single stage, perhaps it is not so 'bad' after all. Most people prefer passive RIAA networks. I'd go for the RJM circuit.
 
#27
Hey rjm..Still Listening to and Loving your 6DJ8 Phono Amp..I'm running Ruskie 6N23P-E tubes in it now, which sound Great..It only took 10 of them to find 3 Good Ones...My question is about R5...I tried a Variable Resistor, but that was a Real Pain...A Tiny Screwdriver, Close Caps..Etc..So, I just put in (2) 82.5Ks and it sounded nice...But, it seemed a bit Bass Lite...So now, I just put in 113K's, and it sounds Bass Beefier...So now, my B+ is only 135V and I was wondering if you could tell me how R5 effects the tone as far as B+ being higher or lower, and what's a Good Range for the R5s?
Here's how it looks now...
Oh, by the way, I listen to this with a Stanton 681EEE with a D74S stylus...So, the Higher End is Very Nice...
 

Attachments

  • 6DJ8 Phono Amp Pre.JPG
    6DJ8 Phono Amp Pre.JPG
    555.2 KB · Views: 539
Last edited:
#28
rjm said:
The RJM Audio website has moved. The information on the 6DJ8 phono project can be found here.

RJM Audio is me. The design of this phono stage is my own, in the sense that I worked out and simulated the RIAA values for the circuit, the operating points for the tubes etc. The "two triodes, passive filter, no feedback" phono circuit is generic and goes way back.
Click to expand...
I found this thread searching for info because I want to build your phono stage .I bought a pcb from stereo 24 in poland but I want to know if I can use these values of the components mentioned on this schematic but for 6N1P tubes? Can you advice?
 

Attachments

  • RJM 6DJ8 Phono Schem.jpg
    RJM 6DJ8 Phono Schem.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 120
#29
The 6N1P is not the same as a 6DJ8 or ECC88.
6N1P has similar gain to a 6DJ8, but its anode resistance is higher and its transconductance is lower.
You could build that circuit using 6N1P tubes using the same parts values and it would most likely 'work'. The EQ might be a bit off, though.
You would need to tweak the circuit to get the correct RIAA EQ and best performance out of those 6N1P triodes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boydk
#30
rongon said:
The 6N1P is not the same as a 6DJ8 or ECC88.
6N1P has similar gain to a 6DJ8, but its anode resistance is higher and its transconductance is lower.
You could build that circuit using 6N1P tubes using the same parts values and it would most likely 'work'. The EQ might be a bit off, though.
You would need to tweak the circuit to get the correct RIAA EQ and best performance out of those 6N1P triodes.
Click to expand...
Can you advice on these tweaks?
 
#31
I haven't looked closely at this circuit, but you would probably need to adjust the values of the anode resistors (R4, R9) and cathode resistors (R3, R10) to bias the tubes, and also adjust the value of R5 (and possibly C2) to correct the response of the RIAA EQ filter for the higher internal anode resistance of the 6N1P.
 
#33
rongon said:
The 6N1P is not the same as a 6DJ8 or ECC88.
6N1P has similar gain to a 6DJ8, but its anode resistance is higher and its transconductance is lower.
You could build that circuit using 6N1P tubes using the same parts values and it would most likely 'work'. The EQ might be a bit off, though.
You would need to tweak the circuit to get the correct RIAA EQ and best performance out of those 6N1P triodes.
Click to expand...
It would be easier to get a pair of ECC88 / E88CC
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjm
#37
Yes it is obvious, nothing else to change?? any suggestion for the capacitors ?
regarding the caps I chose these
WIMA FKP-2 Polypropylene Capacitor 5mm 630V 10nF 2.5%
WIMA FKP-2 Polypropylene Capacitor 5mm 630V 10nF 2.5%
MUNDORF MCAP Capacitor 630V 0.1µF
JANTZEN AUDIO STANDARD Z-CAP Capacitor 400V 1μF
NICHICON KW Electrolytic Audio Capacitor 50V 100μF
JANTZEN AUDIO CROSS-CAP Capacitor 400V 10µF
 
#38
skydrome said:
Yes it is obvious, nothing else to change?? any suggestion for the capacitors ?
regarding the caps I chose these
WIMA FKP-2 Polypropylene Capacitor 5mm 630V 10nF 2.5%
WIMA FKP-2 Polypropylene Capacitor 5mm 630V 10nF 2.5%
MUNDORF MCAP Capacitor 630V 0.1µF
JANTZEN AUDIO STANDARD Z-CAP Capacitor 400V 1μF
NICHICON KW Electrolytic Audio Capacitor 50V 100μF
JANTZEN AUDIO CROSS-CAP Capacitor 400V 10µF
Click to expand...
All OK, as I see it. I take it that you are getting the 30 nF caps by using three caps with value 10 nF in parallel?
Looking forward to your report on the finished product.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom