Experience with EAD E60 line array

EAD is a spinoff of Scanspeak, that use the Jordan technology to make fullrange drivers and build them in the Scanspeak plant. They are well build and reasonable good, but Mark Audio is cheaper and better.

The line array looks logic and could work, but i did not build or hear it myself. It will need a sub altough as not much under 100hz will be there.
 
That is not really a line array, the concept for that goes way, way, way back with Ted Jordan.

What waxx says about MarkAudio, the MA A5.2/3 or even CHN50 would be a better choice.

With the 4Ω drivers one has the option of wiring them in series and use a big cap (or caps) to get fewer of the drivers playing up high, minimizing any combing yet dramatically increasiing cone area as the frequency goes down.

http://www.planet10-hifi.com/downloads/Quad-Driver-Wiring.pdf

(the middle one)

dave
 
Here is picture of my project with EAD60HDMKII. Tested Alpair 5.2, Dayton audio ps95, Mark Audio Pluvia 7.2HD, CHR-70 CHP-70, SB acoustics sb65wbac25-4 EAD, and choice for my project was EAD60HDMKII in OB application with support of satori woofer. Maybe problem is that EAD is expensive so that is reason why is used less. If I will choose between price and performance SB acoustics sb65wbac25-4 is absolute winner.
 

Attachments

  • HYBRID1.jpg
    HYBRID1.jpg
    271.8 KB · Views: 108
  • HYBRID3.jpg
    HYBRID3.jpg
    220.9 KB · Views: 115
EAD60 is much better driver than CHP-70, tested both and not agree that Alpair 5 in my case 5.2 is better than EAD60 HD MKII. EAD60 HD MKII in OB is amazing driver.
CHP-70 is probally the worst of the Mark Audio drivers, the CHN-50 or CHR-70 would be much better if you want the cheaper ones. But i would rather go for the Alpair 7MS or the ALpair 6 for this.