Approximate linear tracking arm idea.

The Rabco ST-4/5/6/7/8 arms all used this principle (by mechanical means, not electrical) and work very effectively.
No. Rabco had a proportional drive.

kép_2022-02-11_174822.png
 
An ST7 dropped into my lap about three years ago. It is what it is, neither a spectacular deck nor a terrible one. Once you've had the, er... "pleasure" of setting one up you'll understand why later manufacturers dropped that linear tracking scheme like a red-hot stove in favor of servo drive.

My impression was that it wasn't particularly robust once adjusted, either. To say that f**ting in its general direction would knock it out-of-whack is only slight hyperbole. Perhaps it worked much better when new and that the then-current performance had been compromised by the age of the rubber components, different lubrication, etc. I really don't know. The Rabco arms do have their followers though, and each system and its environment is different - so maybe there's something I'm missing.

I had fun messing about with it, but at the end of it all I came to realize that I'd experienced vastly better performance from my "conventional" turntables. Your mileage may vary, etc. & etc...
 

Attachments

  • FGD.jpg
    FGD.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 71
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wiseoldtech
I agree with your findings, and will add that that "type" of design didn't last long.
And indeed, the change to electronically-maneuvered linear arms is miles ahead in performance, stability, and reliability.
My Kenwood only needed a new cartridge in all the years/decades that I've owned it, it never gave me grief.
Of course, I did provide some pro-active maintanance to insure peace-of-mind for decades to come.
 
Last edited by a moderator: