Bipolar Elkos in Feedback line?

Hello Folks,
I want to recap an old classic integrated amp (HiFi 50) to bring it back to his original performance. In the signal path there are standard polarized Elkos which I want to replace with bipolar Elkos (Nichicon Muse ES).

My question is does it make sense to replace also the Caps in the Feedback Line (C9 100uF/16V) with the bipolar type?

Thanks and Best Regards, Uwe
 

Attachments

  • D04EE2F9-5EFE-4BF8-977B-E700A4D62547.jpeg
    D04EE2F9-5EFE-4BF8-977B-E700A4D62547.jpeg
    231.7 KB · Views: 165
Thanks for your reply. Got the point that both can be used but a polarized is prefered if there is an DC offset. Why he beat the BP type? This is what I have available:

4,7uF/50V Panasonic FC
10uF/50V Panasonic FC
100uF/16V Panasonic FC
4,7uF/25V Nichicon Muse UES BP
10uF/25V Nichicon Muse UES BP
100uF/16V Nichicon Muse UES BP

So if you are talking about the 10V version you mean the 100uF/10V type. What is the reason to use >50V types?

Thanks, Uwe
 
Thanks for your reply. Got the point that both can be used but a polarized is prefered if there is an DC offset. Why he beat the BP type? This is what I have available:

4,7uF/50V Panasonic FC
10uF/50V Panasonic FC
100uF/16V Panasonic FC
4,7uF/25V Nichicon Muse UES BP
10uF/25V Nichicon Muse UES BP
100uF/16V Nichicon Muse UES BP

So if you are talking about the 10V version you mean the 100uF/10V type. What is the reason to use >50V types?

Thanks, Uwe
better reliability, lower ESR, better sound quality, longer lifetime. 50V, 63V and 100V provides according the datasheets best ESR values in most cases.

Low voltage electrolytics are still bad quality standard. This information give me Mr. Jens Both by phone (BC /Philips components) 12 years ago - go to
https://web.archive.org/web/20090218222942/http://www.elcap.de/index2.html
BP electrolytics actually internal two polarized cap in serial connection back to back - go to
https://electronics.stackexchange.c...lytic-capacitors-be-made-into-a-bipolar/69716
 
As far as I know, most of them just have two formed foils (rather than an antiseries connection of two complete capacitors) and distort less than polar electrolytics, no matter whether there is a DC voltage across them. At least that's what I remember from Cyril Bateman's series about capacitor distortion.

You can find the articles here: https://linearaudio.nl/cyril-batemans-capacitor-sound-articles
 
Last edited:
Correct me if I‘m wrong but all the electrolytics in the application on post #1 are DC biased. Thatswhy (I guess) polarized caps are used by default. If I would replace them all with the polarized FCs it will work fine, check.

But I want to improve the sound quality (THD, clarity?) so the idea was to replace the electrolytics in the signal path with bipolar types which are specially made for audio application (choiced the Muse ES).

My question still is:
1. Can the bipolar type handle the DC bias and make it sense (wrt to improving the sound quality) to replace the polarized type with the Muse ES
2. If 1. is answered with Yes, make it further sense to replace also the Feedback line cap with the Muse ES?

Thanks, Uwe
 
It will work and it will reduce capacitor distortion, but capacitor distortion will probably be very small compared to the distortion from the transistor circuits anyway. That applies to the capacitor in the feedback network as well as to the other AC coupling caps.
 
It will work and it will reduce capacitor distortion, but capacitor distortion will probably be very small compared to the distortion from the transistor circuits anyway. That applies to the capacitor in the feedback network as well as to the other AC coupling caps.
Hello Marcel,
thanks for the clear statement. Could you or somebody else explain me what R8 and C7+C38 on the input stage is doing? Is this also kind of a feedback loop which is only applicable for DC (means not affecting the AC signal) since the caps are parallel to the emitter resistor?

Thanks, Uwe