Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Sandberg, separately, makes the case that if producing intelligence was the primary outcome of evolution, it should have happened much earlier over the last 550 million years, but it did not.
This has been one of the most thought provoking items for me in this thread.
How convenient. Again, line em up and I’ll “believe” as you do. Otherwise, strengthen your faith.🙂
To believe is just another term for 'not knowing'.
I leave faith and believing to people like you who refuse to accept evolution against overwhelming evidence by simply refusing to look at it.
I'm old enough to remember Michael Bentine's "It's a square world" - the episode where the view of Earth from a spacecraft is a slowly rotating cube...
I think Discopete was referring to macro evolution, not micro evolution.I leave faith and believing to people like you who refuse to accept evolution against overwhelming evidence by simply refusing to look at it.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
To believe is just another term for 'not knowing'.
I leave faith and believing to people like you who refuse to accept evolution against overwhelming evidence by simply refusing to look at it.
Fyi - Many on this thread are here to enjoy the argument so it’s dangerous to take all comments literally.
Ever looked at the evolution of the horse from a 44 toothed, 4 toed omnivore the size of a fox to the single hoofed, 24 toothed 500kg herbivore we have today?
For the record, I am not anti-science, nor do I refuse to accept evolution, string theory, dark matter/energy et al. What I don't accept are assumptions. I happen to have my own. When I receive sufficient evidence for something, I will accept it. So far there is virtually none. Saying there is, is simply a matter of opinion. Wearing a particular hat doesn't elevate one's educated opinion to the height of truth.
btw, engaging in non sequitur reveals a position with no foundation, and only reinforces my position. I've presented a valid challenge acknowledged by your responses and received only ridicule. Fine, tell me what you know to be true, not what you think to be true. That would include evidence.
btw, engaging in non sequitur reveals a position with no foundation, and only reinforces my position. I've presented a valid challenge acknowledged by your responses and received only ridicule. Fine, tell me what you know to be true, not what you think to be true. That would include evidence.
I thought they had already reached an agreement here ........🙂
This image of Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet is false then ?, I just want to know that, please answer yes or no. Nothing more !
Then we can do a survey.
Experts Weigh In on Pentagon UFO Report - Scientific American
This image of Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet is false then ?, I just want to know that, please answer yes or no. Nothing more !
Then we can do a survey.
Experts Weigh In on Pentagon UFO Report - Scientific American
Attachments
You would have to be MAD to think the Earth is square! 😀I'm old enough to remember Michael Bentine's "It's a square world" - the episode where the view of Earth from a spacecraft is a slowly rotating cube...

Here is photographic evidence for a flat Earth.
The concentric white lines are the rails the planets run on because gravity is not understood and therefore does not exist.
Now we're getting somewhere.
Please share what you know.Ever looked at the evolution of the horse from a 44 toothed, 4 toed omnivore the size of a fox to the single hoofed, 24 toothed 500kg herbivore we have today?
Instead of me typing it out here you can just look it up on wiki.
A lot easier for all of us.
A lot easier for all of us.
That would be the category of micro evolution. I thought you have something on macro evolution.
I thought they had already reached an agreement here ........🙂
This image of Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet is false then ?, I just want to know that, please answer yes or no. Nothing more !
Then we can do a survey.
Who here maintains that these videos are faked? So what do you mean by true and false, I have no problem with true but with no explanation at this time.
There's absolutely zero evidence of evolution in that example, none. Show me the incremental changes from one to the other. This should be easy if they're there, right? Just another assumption. Remember Benny Hill?😀Ever looked at the evolution of the horse from a 44 toothed, 4 toed omnivore the size of a fox to the single hoofed, 24 toothed 500kg herbivore we have today?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- UFO's- Please help me process