No, it is just highly unlikely given the existence of earth-like planets and the speed at which life arose on Earth.
The general public will very shortly be hit with a lot of unpaid bills and the regrettable loss of some liberties. UFOs are great at such testing times.
That's just a ruse to get you to let your guard down.
What really happens is you get an anal probing. You better listen to this to get you in the mood. Barry White - Can't Get Enough Of Your Love Baby. - YouTube
Doesn't it seem likely that if a planet has conditions conducive to spawning life, it will? Not only is there plentiful life here, that life has evolved in a huge diversity of forms. Land mammals, sea mammals, reptiles, vertibrates, invertebrates, birds, fish, worms, dinosaurs, insects, endoskeleton, exoskeleton, warm climate, cold climate, and the list goes on and on.
It seems that, if given the general conditions, not only does life develop, it develops in a huge diversity. If all that diversity of life has occurred here, it seems more likely than not that at least some form of life will have spawned on one of more of the earth like planets.
There are no "general" conditions conducive to life, only very exact ones. There is not one iota of evidence another planet with conditions suitable for life exist. We can calculate everything about the universe mathematically and the odds of certain outcomes under circumstance. So far the odds of the conditions required to sustain life are one among all other objects out there. Why is that so difficult to accept? Compare the complexity of a living organism to anything else out there. How does it not stand to reason we are the rarest to be found, the only one?
We take raw materials from the Big Bang and make stuff out of it. From the perspective of evolutionary development over billions of years that formed the universe into what it is, we are at the forefront of that timeline, the first. There has to be one and it's us.
We take raw materials from the Big Bang and make stuff out of it. From the perspective of evolutionary development over billions of years that formed the universe into what it is, we are at the forefront of that timeline, the first. There has to be one and it's us.
Most people don't realize ET have already invaded the ( audio) world through tube based gear!:
Metasonix TX-2 Butt Probe Effects Box - CDM Create Digital Music
Eric Barbour is seen as an alien by a lot of guitarist and greatly appreciated by modular synth lovers...
Is electronic music from outer space and Metasonix leading the invasion? 😀
There are no "general" conditions conducive to life, only very exact ones. There is not one iota of evidence another planet with conditions suitable for life exist. We can calculate everything about the universe mathematically and the odds of certain outcomes under circumstance. So far the odds of the conditions required to sustain life are one among all other objects out there. Why is that so difficult to accept? Compare the complexity of a living organism to anything else out there. How does it not stand to reason we are the rarest to be found, the only one?
We take raw materials from the Big Bang and make stuff out of it. From the perspective of evolutionary development over billions of years that formed the universe into what it is, we are at the forefront of that timeline, the first. There has to be one and it's us.
Your human arrogance and vanity are quite stunning. Which is why you probably don't recognize it.
There is nothing much bigger and ours is the only large moon of a rocky planet.
My question should have been, is there evidence that it's happened more than once on Earth? That might answer your question too.
A valid perspective, yes. Whether or not that proves to be the correct perspective remains to be seen. We don't yet know which perspective is correct simply because we don't yet have the technical capability to find out. Therefore, in the meanwhile, it is human arrogance and vanity to deny the possibility of life elsewhere, and quite possibly on a nearby planet.
Last edited:
Scott, if I correctly understand your point here, then the mass extinction-cycles are the closest evidence we have. While all life has never been destroyed, biblical flood stories aside, we do know that life has readily recovered from great damage multiple times.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.