Here are their competitors. Someone loves beautiful baubles (spoon-bait).
Digital Cables - aurealisaudio
ETI Research Silver Chassis RCA Socket red/black, FS-08
http://www.furutech.com/2013/01/30/3481/
Digital Cables - aurealisaudio
ETI Research Silver Chassis RCA Socket red/black, FS-08
http://www.furutech.com/2013/01/30/3481/
Last edited:
There is nothing wrong with jewelry, as long as it is not confused with superior function.
Cheers,
Howie
I am sure that on a brilliant and beautiful RCA connector it is possible to catch not only a lover of sound, but even catch a pike. 🙂
Last edited:
Hawksford and his analysis was the bane of my existence for years. Trying explain audio going down a cable slower than the speed of sound was something I just could not do. However it sold lots of wire.
I have very little confidence in those measurements. I may attempt to duplicate them with better instrumentation but only if there is a real reason to do so.
I have very little confidence in those measurements. I may attempt to duplicate them with better instrumentation but only if there is a real reason to do so.
Well, I don't agree with you Demian. I believe that Dr. Hawksford made a breakthrough in wire analysis. There is just too much about what we still do not know about wires to think that they all sound pretty much the same.
John- Noel had some numbers derived from Hawksford that has low frequencies moving at feet per second and used them in his presentations. That clearly doesn't fly. Not that there aren't issues in different cables, just not that. I still have not seen dispersion like that in cables. Nanoseconds yes, not milliseconds.
I am pretty sure you are looking at the wrong thing. Think perpendicular to the wire, not along it. Noel doesn't count.
Totally debunked at length by jn years ago. The math is also flawed as several physicists have noted.
You can read up to "depth of bass" and stop there. Bass is also the favorite of the op-amp rollers.
"depth of bass" is almost at the very end, also drew attention to it but it was too late.
Last edited:
Sure. Wrong theory to explain audibility of most hi-fi cables.
Could be the recent Japanese paper is probing closer to the truth. Time will tell, I guess.
Last edited:
I have personally met with Dr. Hawksford over the decades. He hasn't backed down yet, so far as I know on this wire analysis. JN doesn't count either. Hawksford gave up on him, as another groundless 'critic', demanding much, personally proving nothing. If there is any mistakes in his math, let's see them! It is so easy to diss somebody by being critical of their math, just because they don't understand it well enough. Happens all the time.
John so you can go ahead and thoroughly explain his math (please do, no hand waving) or does that put you in the same tenuous position you accuse those who disagree with Dr. Hawksford, whom *have* done the work?
Because otherwise, you've effectively shown the irony of your signature once again.
Because otherwise, you've effectively shown the irony of your signature once again.
Aurex SC-lambda 90F 1982
The clean drive circuit original with an Aurex is carried.
The non-linear ingredient of back electromotive force detects the distorted ingredient generated owing to in 3rd cord tied to the minus terminal of the speaker, it feeds back in amplifier, and distortion is negated. Thereby, reduction can obtain higher-harmonic-wave distortion or less to 1/10, and the features, such as formation of impedance zero of reduction, a flat frequency response, and a speaker cord and dumping factor infinity, are sharply acquired in intermodulation distortion.
Aurex SC-lambda 90F
The clean drive circuit original with an Aurex is carried.
The non-linear ingredient of back electromotive force detects the distorted ingredient generated owing to in 3rd cord tied to the minus terminal of the speaker, it feeds back in amplifier, and distortion is negated. Thereby, reduction can obtain higher-harmonic-wave distortion or less to 1/10, and the features, such as formation of impedance zero of reduction, a flat frequency response, and a speaker cord and dumping factor infinity, are sharply acquired in intermodulation distortion.
Aurex SC-lambda 90F
It was the experiment the jn criticized, the construction and measurement stuff is his expertise. It did not require rocket science, interesting that no one in all these years has repeated it. You would think the guys at CERN or LIGO would be interested and AFAIK there has never been a single verification of any of the results.