Faital W10n8-700 TH?

Hello,
Bought 2 of these awhile from a "buyout" planning for small 2ways PA top, end up did not need to. Could a PA sub TH worth a try?
 

Attachments

  • ts.JPG
    ts.JPG
    31.5 KB · Views: 409
  • input.JPG
    input.JPG
    66.2 KB · Views: 399
  • acoustical power.JPG
    acoustical power.JPG
    48.4 KB · Views: 391
  • displacement.JPG
    displacement.JPG
    49.3 KB · Views: 393
  • group delay.JPG
    group delay.JPG
    47.3 KB · Views: 387
  • FaitalW10n8-700.txt
    FaitalW10n8-700.txt
    1 KB · Views: 62
  • faitalpro.jpg
    faitalpro.jpg
    100.7 KB · Views: 186
  • phase response.JPG
    phase response.JPG
    64.4 KB · Views: 164
I would of course recommend the ROAR10 over any generic tapped horn with that specific driver.

With a Qts of 0,2 and a Bl of 24,7 (Re 5,5 Ohm) that driver is uniquely suited for high order QW bandpass alignments like the 8th order ROAR.

The ROAR12 and ROAR15 is the first tapped designs that easily beats THAM and several other tapped horns in both sound quality and quantity that I have heard to date.

You can make the ROAR10 a little deeper if you want to push it down to 45 Hz.

ROAR10-10cm.png

Here is a simulated comparison between the original ROAR10 copied from your simulation posted above and a 10 cm deeper ROAR10. 10 cm longer front resonator and 20 cm longer tapped pipe section.
 
The Faital 10HP1020 looks to be the second/new version of this Faital W10n8-700, although there are some slight changes in the published specs.

Yeah, kindly post it when built, I would love to see it, as I might be building as well using the 10HP1020 loaded in ROAR but in 2 X 10" a cab.