That would be a positive bias. I prefer to listen to music in the comfort of my own space for many reasons. It may well influence how I perceive the sound, I want to like it and be happy with it because I know that the live experience, most of the time, would not be as pleasurable for me.bias is just a preference in my book.
I suppose I should ask Scott W. for clearance to muck up the thread a little, JC seems on board?
Depends very much on the person Matt, enhancement or depletion type. 😀... calling bias stories BS is a bias, probably the greatest one.
I have RCA fed powered sub centrally between two floor standers (1"x1, 6.5"x2) and I find the LR position and depth position of the sub to be critical and surprisingly so for good and coherent overall sound and imaging.Yes, it is interesting. I'm experimenting successfully with an IB subwoofer in the corner of my room (supposed to be bad place?) I'm getting a smooth response except for my ever present peak at 40Hz, easily cut and no nulls. What do you do bass wise? Another useful test Sine Burst Tones (20-200 Hz)
The sub has level and LP controls and I find these adjustments to be critical and according to the mastering of the programme.
The other usage of these controls is deliberate bass remastering of tracks according to taste....and circumstance etc.
So, according to my experience I am curious that such corner placement does not 'unbalance' the stereo experience ?.
If the music purpose is general background music then I suppose it is not so important, for 3D hi-fi imaging I expect the imbalances would be a nuisance.
Tell us what you find longer term ?.
Dan.
Last edited:
I have two u-frame subs positioned near my mains and have used delay to get them more time coherent. My plan was to use the IB for the bottom octave to take the load off the u-frames, I don't like boost and excursion if I can help it. I haven't got them all going together yet, but have been pleasantly surprised using the IB below ~100Hz. It's not as house and neighbour friendly as the OBs though 🙂
That would mean a stool for each of my feet in my set-up 😀Two subs is a must in my book......Inboard and forward of the mains.
How do you fight room modes doing that?
First symptom of ferrites.Thanks Pavel,
It’s the original Hint not the 6, (same basic thing but 6 has a couple updates) and yes transparency is not a strong point.
Almost as if the leading/trailing edge transients are muffled.
Dan.
[/B]
IME the series inductors marked in the pic cause unnatural subjective mayhem and need to be removed...... wire bypasses will not do but could be tried as a first experiment in hearing stage by stage changes.
First experiment is to fit a couple of non directional links flat bridging or high looping across the vacant inductor pads.........a length of stripped Cat5 wire looped back and twisted is plenty of conductance for the purpose and in this environment is said to be non-directional conductance.
Enameled wire of similar gauge similarly implemented is also perfectly suitable and is indeed another subjective experiment.
Those non directional 'naked' wire loops are open to application of all kinds of modifiers, that's part of what Goop is about.
.
Wire bypasses will not do?
What would be best....I do have a 18gauge air core inductor I could strip but what would be best to start with?
That would mean a stool for each of my feet in my set-up 😀
How do you fight room modes doing that?
Mostly dsp but positioning is critical
Foot massage while listening!
No because the ferrites are still 'in circuit' despite short circuit wires across them.Wire bypasses will not do?
What would be best....I do have a 18gauge air core inductor I could strip but what would be best to start with?
A stripped strand of Cat5 folded back on itself and twisted......long enough to make two links that replace the ferrite links.
Make the links long enough to come vertically up off the board 15/20mm or so and loop over and go vertically back down to the other pad....this looping is for later experiments/tweaking.
Bare Cat5 strand (24AWG/0.51mm) doubled back versus enamelled 24AWG doubled back will make a fine difference......if you have suitable enameled wire preferrably use that, diameter is not critical except for physical size restraints....two 18 AWG (1.0mm) wires might not fit into the pcb holes.
24AWG links will not present as any bottleneck but will cause a different sound to that of the ferrites and let the amp 'open up' with different tonal and dynamic characters.
Once the AC power input is sorted we will go to the other end of the amp.
Dan.
Last edited:
Ok I misunderstood.......I was assuming the ferrite were out and the wire was no good.
I’ll add 24awg magnet wire to the list
I’ll add 24awg magnet wire to the list
Last edited:
You need only 200mm or so, OTOH the rest of a small reel would be useful for interconnects etc.....that's the wire I use and you have heard.
I would bypass/remove those Molex pin connectors at speaker terminals first and solder the output wires directly to the speaker terminals. It is incredible that Parasound uses such a tiny connector joint for speaker output.
My Weller (soldering iron) died, so I got this one; surprisingly good for the price!
It looks pretty good and really a value (almost the same price as a single Metcal tip). The English in the writeup is pretty challenged but I'm sure its pretty obvious how to operate when you use it. Any complaints now that you have some experience with it?
Don't, leave them alone those are zobel, just directly solder the wires to the binding posts.What of the little cap and resistor? Eliminate?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III