Not magic. All perfectly explainable. But sometimes it is 'an inconvenient truth' and the cognitive dissonance can be made to go away by pretending it's just magic 😎
Jan
Jan
I almost sure that human brain can do very difficalt different sound post-processing, which can extend our possibilities to something much lower tban -90 dB.
Actually you might be able to use the AP software with a QA401. Its not quite as good as an RTX but quite available and has the hardware interface for audio testing. I can get -109 dB THD pretty consistently with one. The SNR/dynamic range is not what you can get with a dedicated analyzer but no ADC based device can do that. They aren't in the Focusrite price range but still less than a Lynx E22 and I think higher performance in some areas.
The AK5934A which is the magic in the RTX (and the AP515 ?) has been discontinued so everyone will be looking for a replacement. Dead giveaway that the ADC is not the AK5934A is the rising noise floor at HF.
When I tried to get the ESS ADC running the performance was quite poor. I contacted ESS and they could not help me get better results. I sent the demo board back and the chip seems to have vanished without a trace.
The AK5934A which is the magic in the RTX (and the AP515 ?) has been discontinued so everyone will be looking for a replacement. Dead giveaway that the ADC is not the AK5934A is the rising noise floor at HF.
When I tried to get the ESS ADC running the performance was quite poor. I contacted ESS and they could not help me get better results. I sent the demo board back and the chip seems to have vanished without a trace.
Ask Dolby about that!I almost sure that human brain can do very difficalt different sound post-processing, which can extend our possibilities to something much lower tban -90 dB.
On the other hand, unless we listen to a continuous tone, music isn't necessarily waiting for our brain to accommodate...
Last edited:
Actually you might be able to use the AP software with a QA401. Its not quite as good as an RTX but quite available and has the hardware interface for audio testing. I can get -109 dB THD pretty consistently with one. The SNR/dynamic range is not what you can get with a dedicated analyzer but no ADC based device can do that. They aren't in the Focusrite price range but still less than a Lynx E22 and I think higher performance in some areas.
The AK5934A which is the magic in the RTX (and the AP515 ?) has been discontinued so everyone will be looking for a replacement. Dead giveaway that the ADC is not the AK5934A is the rising noise floor at HF.
When I tried to get the ESS ADC running the performance was quite poor. I contacted ESS and they could not help me get better results. I sent the demo board back and the chip seems to have vanished without a trace.
Yes, most probably the APx500 Flex will work with the QA401, the requirement seems to be ASIO compatibility.
The 2722 gets its very low residual (2nd at 1kHz -136dBr on a good day) from using an analog notch with post-notch gain and throwing that at a DAC. That lowers the dynamic range requirement for the DAC by at least 60dB.
That is what I try to emulate with my tracking notch filter. Which seems to work but I haven't been able to work on it for a month due to other (paying) obligations.
Jan
If you have Glen Kleinschmidt aproval, as i don't even know how to contact him, i can post here his -120thd analyzer schematics.
Has anybody tried what's on page 10-15 of this?https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/5866763300941AN245.pdf
The AK5934A which is the magic in the RTX (and the AP515 ?) has been discontinued so everyone will be looking for a replacement. Dead giveaway that the ADC is not the AK5934A is the rising noise floor at HF.
When I tried to get the ESS ADC running the performance was quite poor. I contacted ESS and they could not help me get better results. I sent the demo board back and the chip seems to have vanished without a trace.
Do you know the mystery of APx555 used ADC chip's 😀
May no one opened the hard locked closing yet, otherwise loosing the proofed calibration 😱
Hp
With a good analog front end and notch filters you don't need the same performance ADC. I suspect that uses an industrial wide band ADC.
The AK5934A which is the magic in the RTX (and the AP515 ?) has been discontinued so everyone will be looking for a replacement.
Is the AKM motivation for discontinuing an unrivalled product known?
What a smart idea - And you can trust your doubts, also. Because for shure you will be disappointed. AK4499 is not an AD converter. It's someting else. Guess what ...... I will get an (now available) AKD4499 A/D demo board. ... expectations for a measurement tool (which I somehow doubt, but I'll find out soon enough).
What a smart idea - And you can trust your doubts, also. Because for shure you will be disappointed. AK4499 is not an AD converter. It's someting else. Guess what ...
I mean, D/A. Did I guess this time?
It seems the package was discontinued so they did not want to layout a new chip to work with newer packages. It's not a highly profitable market with small volumes.Is the AKM motivation for discontinuing an unrivalled product known?
Jan I'd stumbled accross this thread whilst researching getting a new sound card, and I've just now in another thread remembered about something someone showed me a few years ago which is probably in the ball park of what you are looking for (if not a tad on the expensive side).
ADI-2-Pro FS - RME Audio Interfaces | Format Converters | Preamps | Network Audio & MADI Solutions
Tony.
ADI-2-Pro FS - RME Audio Interfaces | Format Converters | Preamps | Network Audio & MADI Solutions
Tony.
- Home
- Design & Build
- Equipment & Tools
- Best soundcard for low noise THD measurement?