Yes hoisted by my own again. I blame the rubbish shift key on this keyboard that my fat fingers keep missing.
Once I glanced at the domain name I didn't bother with the comments. I've heard of the site before and the man who runs it, and don't find it or him credible.
Joseph Mercola - Google Search
This is all certainly (in some sense) possible, but your posts here aren't convincing to me, especially considering the sources you give.
Not to mention 60Hz!
In the 1990s there was also concern that one area had a high incidence of cancer and a high-voltage transmission line went through the area, and the line went right by an elementary school. Here, Frontline, Currents Of Fear. There was once a transcript online PHILIP MORRIS "CURRENTS OF FEAR" FRONTLINE 950613 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Also, this book "The Great Power-Line Cover-Up"
The Great Power-Line Cover-Up: How the Utilities and the Government Are Trying to Hide the Cancer Hazard Posed by Electromagnetic Fields: Paul Brodeur: 9780316109116: Amazon.com: Books
We can't prove or convince anyone in particular. We can only comment on our own experiences and point to others who might have some interesting info to share. For example, I am typically on my I-phone for 8 hours or more, usually getting news, Facebook, and playing strategy games. I almost never put the I-phone up to my ear or head, but what about the rest of my body? It has to be close to something. Besides my brain, what else is sensitive to this sort of RF radiation?
I also recall reading that many HV transmission lines were put where land had been contaminated by prior use, as no residences could be built there.
And decades later, that was forgotten. When schools were built to cover the increasing population in a town, the only available land for the school was near the power lines.
Correlation, but certainly not causation.
I certainly do admire those who engage their topic with passion. The problem comes when they confuse passion with understanding to the point that they no longer self-check, instead careening down the mountain of self righteousness and invalid certainty.
jn
Originally Posted by john curl View Post: Besides my brain, what else is sensitive to this sort of RF radiation?
When you use your phone, are you in a chair, leaning back a bit with the phone in your lap? 😱
Last edited:
Radiation Studies - CDC: Non-Ionizing Radiation
Important to know the difference. What we haven't seen is a rise in brain cancers, especially above accounting for lead time bias. So it's both mechanistic implausible and epidemiologically non-correlative.
Important to know the difference. What we haven't seen is a rise in brain cancers, especially above accounting for lead time bias. So it's both mechanistic implausible and epidemiologically non-correlative.
As I mentioned earlier, N2 resonance is obviously associated with the kinetic theory of gases, where the temperature of a molecule will govern the motional, vibrational, and rotational energy, latter two of which are nominally resonant in nature.
So *obviously* the microscopic absorption of non-ionizing radiation by the air in a typical room will magnificently affect these resonances and, thus, materially change the sound propagation in the room. This does only ever change the sound for the better.
So *obviously* the microscopic absorption of non-ionizing radiation by the air in a typical room will magnificently affect these resonances and, thus, materially change the sound propagation in the room. This does only ever change the sound for the better.
Last edited:
Thanks for the analysis, and I perceive your tongue firmly in cheek, but is it possible to perform an actual, serious analysis of these Bybee claims? (without actually lending any credibility to the ridiculous)
So what is the source of the non-ionizing radiation? Does the Bybee device actually produce radiation energy? And is that even what Bybee is claiming? How much energy would be required to change the "resonant" energy of the major constituent gas of the air in a room? What does it even mean to say the resonant frequency of nitrogen is changed? Why would that be a good thing? What evidence is there that these Bybee devices actually do anything at all let alone what the manufacturer claims they do?
To be clear, my belief is that the devices are not a source of energy, the claim is meaningless, and there is no supporting evidence.
So what is the source of the non-ionizing radiation? Does the Bybee device actually produce radiation energy? And is that even what Bybee is claiming? How much energy would be required to change the "resonant" energy of the major constituent gas of the air in a room? What does it even mean to say the resonant frequency of nitrogen is changed? Why would that be a good thing? What evidence is there that these Bybee devices actually do anything at all let alone what the manufacturer claims they do?
To be clear, my belief is that the devices are not a source of energy, the claim is meaningless, and there is no supporting evidence.
I am not even going to pretend I could contrive a story that could fit the narrative. Sorry nezbleu--the only conceivable way such a device could work, especially given its size, is as a hunk of rapidly decaying radioisotope. Which I wouldn't want to be in the same neighborhood as if not thoroughly contained.
My tongue in cheek was highlighting the fear of cell phone EM radiation.
My tongue in cheek was highlighting the fear of cell phone EM radiation.
Dubious product from Knocturn alley, or illicit Species 116 technology from Delta quadrant. Pick your poison. 
Last edited:
Yes, and no point to try to convince others, they can only try things for themselves....and then the curiosity starts on how some 'tweaks' work, as it did for me.
It has been stated that EMR affects/effects calcium transport and signalling in cellular processes with consequent oxidative stress, but I think there are additional mechanisms at work. RF/EMR is energy transmission but it seems with 'signature' according to the materials that the wave/disturbance launches from/transmits through, and this signature energy preferentially couples with loads of same signature it seems......I believe this is one mechanism for EMR affecting/effecting chemical processes in organisms, and for example as in red wines as I have described.
IME/IMO this 'steering' of biochemical processes can be advantageous or deleterious, and deleterious EMR can lead to stress conditions and typical 'stress symptoms' like lack of physical energy and neurological disorders such as anxiety/depression with risk of cancer/tumor a secondary effect and way down in probability. Geopathic earth radiations are one example of deleterious 'energies', the typical home and workplace are additionally full of man made deleterious energies including those from AC wiring, cell phones, wi-fi, fluorescent and led lighting, construction and decor materials etc. I maintain that EMR is not by definition damaging but it is the embedded signature information that renders EMR bad or good, and it seems that EMR energy can be 'filtered' and rendered beneficial and distinctly so.....this is the current state/result of my investigations.
There are earth locations that are strongly energetic, these can be fiercely geopathic and there are locations that are strongly beneficial or healing.......this is a big clue from nature and signals that EMR is not in and of itself damaging and is natural condition of life. JC, running your phone as an internet terminal with Airplane mode on, and Wi-Fi only turned on will probably give lowest radiated emissions and least bio-effects especially if the phone is placed on a surface and operated and not held in the hand. More later....
Dan.
Phew! I did it. I moved and now I am living in Thailand! It will take a month to get my test gear shipped by boat.....$9500 USD to ship everything. !!
Should be more interesting, now. Lots to do.
Later. <3
-RNM
Should be more interesting, now. Lots to do.
Later. <3
-RNM
Anyone here remember the story from the late 90’s or early 2000’s of a guy who worked with his laptop on his lap (that’s why they call it a laptop I suppose) and fried his nuts? He claimed working like this had made him sterile.
I don’t know what the outcome was.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.