John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
What a great story! :)
Oh. I have better ones ..... here is one regarding the special "Q" clearance:

I was at a dinner in a nice quiet neighborhood of Georgetown outside of Washington DC. Hang out of the rich and famous and politians. The host had also invited a woman who worked for our government in DC to dinner also. After dinner the woman asked what I did. I was fairly brief -- just where and mentioned I had a "Q" clearance for 25 years.

The woman's eyes got really big. She stopped talking. Fear was on her face. Like she realised she was sitting opposite a serial killer or something worse. Oh, I said, I can see you Know. She didnt say anything more and got up. She was gone a long time talking to my host in another room. When my host came back without the woman friend, i asked where is so and so? All I got for an answer was "She left after you said you had a Q clearance".

True story. First time told.

-Richard
 
Last edited:
A scientific method requests for independent verification of new findings by replication of the experiment at a different work place. Joe, I will measure speaker distortion with and without impedance flattening. The speaker impedance looks like

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.


What value of parallel flattening resistance do you recommend for a start? I have power resistors of 6.8 ohm, 10 ohm and higher. Some coils and big foil capacitors as well.
 
"Back" when I was learning this stuff, EMF and Back-EMF were measured in volts.

True. I know somebody who creatively called in "anti-voltage" in New Zealand. Put that voltage in series with a current, it will restrict the current. It impedes current, it becomes an impedance. Neville Thiele showed this (documented it) way back in the 1960's. This was how he measured the impedance plot of a speaker. He converted volts to Ohm. It's textbook stuff.

I am not trying to troll others, I am simply replying to "benb."
 
What a great story! :)

Oh. I have better ones ..... here is one regarding the special "Q" clearance:

I was at a dinner in a nice quiet neighborhood of Georgetown outside of Washington DC. Hang out of the rich and famous and politians. The host had also invited a woman who worked for our government in DC to dinner also. After dinner the woman asked what I did. I was fairly brief -- just where and mentioned I had a "Q" clearance for 25 years.

The woman's eyes got really big. She stopped talking. Fear was on her face. Like she realised she was sitting opposite a serial killer or something worse. Oh, I said, I can see you Know. She didnt say anything more and got up. She was gone a long time talking to my host in another room. When my host came back without the woman friend, i asked where is so and so? All I got for an answer was "She left after you said you had a Q clearance".

True story. First time told.
-Richard

"Q" clearance,:eek: shouldn't you guys be using the 'cone of silence' ?

YouTube
 

TNT

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
For a better word... this was really... lame? How can you post that - it says absolutely nothing. This strengthen you in the mindset that you are correct and "they" are wrong? Morris??? He called you stupid? Black box is a very helpful architectural concept used to hide complexity when not needed - there could be large or small ones as per need.

//

Phone text message conversation with an EE friend of mine.

To Morris from Joe:

"Yesterday had an online discussion and was blown away by a simple fact that even among those who consider themselves on 'expert' level cannot stomach F=BLi equation because it does not fit their world view based on a voltage model. They will shift, twist, side-step and conflate other issues into it. Yet I presented proof that any measured current produces an exact same change acoustically. I proved doubling the current produced an inrease in 6dB SPL. They said it changes with frequency and I slapped my head, it works at ANY frequency. I stared down the madness... so this is what we are up against. The force = Bli, where "i" stands for current, is ignored, an inconvenient truth."

From Morris to Joe:

"KISS. Keep it simple, stupid. How many examples are there where people have forgotten or don't know how things work, preferring to think of them Black Boxes. E.g opamps, DSP, DACs, logic, etc."

Joe's reply:

"Precisely! Compartmentalised in the brain, they have to unlearn. But some will thank you and others will hate you because you disturb their world view. But that is how it is."

Morris replies back:

"Unfortunately the world is full of audiophilia is religion and politics combined. As far as I'm concerned, I do what I do. If you like it, great, if not, it's a free country."

Good advice, it's a free country. That exchange was this morning (10AM here).

"Black Box" thinking. I will remember that.
 
A scientific method requests for independent verification of new findings by replication of the experiment at a different work place. Joe, I will measure speaker distortion with and without impedance flattening.

OK, I did it :). As a part of another measurements, it was no problem to add a "flattening" resistor of 4 ohm.

Attached is the impedance plot of the speaker. One can see that impedance near resonance goes up to 47 ohm and that it remains above 6 ohm everywhere. So, with 4 ohm "flattening" resistor the impedance will be between 2.4 ohm and 6.4 ohm, values including resonance.

I have measured speaker acoustical output at 15 cm distance from woofer, on woofer axis. At 1Vrms and 2Vrms and 5Vrms amplifier output. Distortion plots are shown for both cases, i.e. no flattening resistor and 4 ohm parallel flattening resistor. The distortion is not changed after "flattening", in other respect than acoustical measurement statistic deviations. So - nothing :).

P.S.: Amplifier distortion was below 0.01% in all measurements
 

Attachments

  • cno_compl_impedance.png
    cno_compl_impedance.png
    52 KB · Views: 310
  • 1V no flattening.png
    1V no flattening.png
    66.2 KB · Views: 306
  • 1V 4R flattening.png
    1V 4R flattening.png
    68 KB · Views: 247
  • 2V no flattening.png
    2V no flattening.png
    56.3 KB · Views: 243
  • 2V 4R flattening.png
    2V 4R flattening.png
    56.9 KB · Views: 98
  • 5V no flattening.png
    5V no flattening.png
    54.9 KB · Views: 67
  • 5V 4R flattening.png
    5V 4R flattening.png
    55.5 KB · Views: 71
Last edited:
What are the three colours of the graphs and what is the speaker crossover schematic ?.

Dan.
Three colors are THD (grey), H2 (red) and H3 (orange),

The full conditions are not defined so no conclusions can be drawn yet. Also did Pavel not state earlier that adding parallel resistor will cause increase in distortion but now says "The distortion is not changed after "flattening".

Dan.
Yes, however it was said about amplifier output distortion. As this is much much lower than that of the speaker, acoustical distortion is unchanged.

All those stories about impedance flattening may be related to some tube amplifiers with high output impedance, to some extent. For SS amplifiers (not speaking about some curious non feedback designs) all the stories about R, RC helping amplifier to deal with EMF are simply a big nonsense.

A pleasant coincidence right after asking you yesterday. Thank you Pavel.

Looks to me like Black is THD, Red is 2nd harmonic and yellow is 3rd.

Thank you, I am sorry I forgot to include the legend in the image.
 
Q Sensitive allow access to Special Nuclear Material (SNM) category 1. An employee with a Q sensitive clearance could have access to nuclear weapons design, manufacture, or use data; disclosure could cause exceptionally grave damage to the nation.

-RM

So, why did she leave?

Is it bad practice to disclose that you had that clearance, since it could make you a target?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.