Are L-Pads a good idea in a passive XO?

Status
Not open for further replies.
diyAudio Member
Joined 2007
Researching a new small 3-Way and several of the XO designs for similar speakers have variable resistance L-Pads on both the midrange and the tweeters.
What are the benefits of using them?
What are the drawbacks other than the high cost?
I don't like padding down a midrange usually but I understand that it is needed to get a proper balance between drivers sometimes.
Locally I can only find one supplier and they are $26- each plus postage and purchasing from O/S won't save anything as International postage has gone through the roof lately
 
I would regard the advantage as being able to change the levels when the acoustic environment of the speakers changes e.g. when introducing new furnishings to the listening room or even introducing the speakers to a different listening room.

Some say the disadvantage is that the contacts between wipers and tracks may become unreliable over time. However, I've been using L-pads on the tweeters of one of my speakers for 30 years now with no signs of deterioration.
 
I would regard the advantage as being able to change the levels when the acoustic environment of the speakers changes e.g. when introducing new furnishings to the listening room or even introducing the speakers to a different listening room.....
+1

Absolutely necessary. Just a wannabee-engineer dream you can plan ahead perfectly.

But the corollary is obvious: the mid-range and tweeter have to start louder than the woofer.

Silly not to bi-amp/DSP if you want to meet today's SQ expectations.... and save yourself endless grief that comes when a conscientious builder is going with passive XO. You just dial it in, listen, tweak, done. Repeat next week if not satisfied.

B.
 
Last edited:
Strapped Alternative

Researching a new small 3-Way and several of the XO designs for similar speakers have variable resistance L-Pads on both the midrange and the tweeters.
What are the benefits of using them?
What are the drawbacks other than the high cost?
I don't like padding down a midrange usually but I understand that it is needed to get a proper balance between drivers sometimes.
Locally I can only find one supplier and they are $26- each plus postage and purchasing from O/S won't save anything as International postage has gone through the roof lately

L-Pads are used to match the output level of drivers with different sensitivities. They may be implemented with resistance ladders that provide 1-5 to 3 dB steps selected by strapping. A lot of steps are not required to align driver outputs. Use these on tweeter drive signals only. This arrangement avoids cost and noise inherent with the use of continuously variable or switched L-pads. WHG
 
Last edited:
Tannoy uses fixed position variable resistor sets on their tweeter that allow +/- 2dB increments.

Typically the shunt resistor is the one to change, as the series resistor doe shift the axial response somewhat.
 
They are helpful when designing a crossover. Once you get it right (not only the level) you won't want to touch them.

Sure, there are variations between songs, but adjusting the whole tweeter is too coarse to fix this. On the other hand, a temptation to keep tweaking the knobs is a sign that there are other problems with your crossover.
 
Locally I can only find one supplier and they are $26- each plus postage

The cost is the biggest factor for the tweeters You don't often need 100Watts on the high range but all the faders I have seen recently are 100W
$26 equates to around £14 and that is the going rate for a 100W L-pad in the UK as shown in the following link: L-Pad Attenuators, 8 Ohm and 16 Ohm 15 -100 watts - Willys-Hifi Ltd

Also note the availablity there of 50W and 15W versions.

P.S. I couldn't resist attaching some L-pad porn in the shape of the Realistic L-pads I've used on a succession of builds over more years than I care to mention - plus a page from a Radio Shack catalogue in which they are featured.
 

Attachments

  • Realistic L pads front.jpg
    Realistic L pads front.jpg
    224.5 KB · Views: 81
  • Cat Page.jpg
    Cat Page.jpg
    132.4 KB · Views: 80
  • Realistic L pads inverted.jpg
    Realistic L pads inverted.jpg
    241.1 KB · Views: 83
Status
Not open for further replies.