Sorry more rot. You really need to spend less time posting and more time researching or asking the right questions.
Really?
I think you should first read what i say and compare with your own system set-up...You don't have the same set-up as most of us, having separate turntables , tonearms, preamps and cartridges so you cannot draw a conclusion on the same system the same way.
I already explained everything it is to explain.
I am not wrong .In this subject on this particular problem, you're wrong.
Last edited:
I don't know, hence my question
The predictable results sounds reasonable depending on how you measure results, I hope it's not customer satisfaction for the reason I outlined, I presume you understand my reservations about that?I didn't make too much noise in the last 7 years since i started to build phono preamps .
Were you curious to build this thing?
YouTube
Vinyl Turntable Equipment: DIY tangential tonearm
I was.
You want to teach me more about your expensive set-up and what all the people that are in control of this high end media are telling about 3000 dollars tonearms too?
Go ahead!
I can tell you that this is the best tonearm you could ever have .How do i prove it in a statistical analyses done on only one system though?
Well...the water "knows" that the Earh is Flat
Of course i'm not a flat earth guy, but you understand what i'm saying.Apart from that, the friction system on a water slide...can't be beaten by oil or other grease mechanism.Simple physics.
Yet there is a single mechanical friction spot on that tonearm and for that i got a rolling mechanism from a video tape machine, but the whole theoretical model can show that it's much more advanced than any solid mechanical model on the market no matter the price.It costs me less than 20 pounds to build one .
It's just the inconvenience of dealing with a system done on water...
Attachments
Last edited:
Hearing is not linear (in the sense of time-invariance). Threshold of hearing in audiology testing is done with single tones in isolation.
When people hear small aberrations in music, the level of the music itself is much higher than the threshold of hearing.
Two very different situations. There is no basis for assuming one result can be applied to the other in a linear fashion.
Last edited:
It's a bit higher, but the signal to noise ratio should also be higher.
Philips proposed in the 90's video reading attached to an AI neural model to read the information and remove the noise.Actually it's reading one single detailed 3d photograph of the whole vinyl.Today it can be done perfectly.You just clean the vinyl, make a photo of it with a high resolution camera, probably a stereo one, transfer to your computer and it's going to play the photo.
The ELP laser system is an expired Phillips patent too...The Japanese bought the patent before it expired, i think.
Philips proposed in the 90's video reading attached to an AI neural model to read the information and remove the noise.Actually it's reading one single detailed 3d photograph of the whole vinyl.Today it can be done perfectly.You just clean the vinyl, make a photo of it with a high resolution camera, probably a stereo one, transfer to your computer and it's going to play the photo.
The ELP laser system is an expired Phillips patent too...The Japanese bought the patent before it expired, i think.
Last edited:
Why Higher ? Optical = no friction noise.
While the vinyl, and not the mother master, closer from the original, and, because metallic, not subject to electrostatic dust problems ?
Restauration has to be made by the record companies that keep both the master tapes and the original father and mothers vinyl masters: A cultural duty.
Last edited:
The original inventor was a customer, I don't think it was any large company. It has plenty of problems with dust too.
On the contrary (for the same reasons), we have more dust problems with digital photography than the old film photography.
Except when they loose or damage them... It happens more often than you think.
Also, there's the extreme case of the Direct-to-Disk records: I still own 1 well worn and 1 brand new sealed copies of the famed Sheffield "I've Got The Music In Me". I'm still trying to figure out what to do with the pristine copy.
Any idea?
Direct to disk is just a way to avoid the magnetic tape hiss and added distortion. The mother master still existed.
You could take contact with the owner of the label if he is interested in an other source for digital restauration ?
High Performance Loudspeakers - Optimising High Fidelity Loudspeaker Systems, 7th Edition | The Absolute Sound
The review seems better than the book. by Robert Greene (PHd math prof at UCLA - retired).
THx-RNMarsh
The review seems better than the book. by Robert Greene (PHd math prof at UCLA - retired).
THx-RNMarsh
Indeed...I remembered some untrue stories i thought i have read a while ago:
Laser turntable - Wikipedia
Yet, to quote somebody, "No laser ever moved a single dust particle! " , just a diamond tip with the right velocity and friction
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/att...curls-blowtorch-preamplifier-iii-img_0369-jpg
The arm looks pretty straight forward, but the plinth is going to be a b*tch to build.
The arm looks pretty straight forward, but the plinth is going to be a b*tch to build.
His statement being nonsense is your opinion, a biased one. After all, you go around the forums trying to shill for your audio business and P. A.'s statements get in the way so you smear his statements. It's an old tactic.
Thank you for confirming my suspicion once again. You don't have a proof of what I mentioned.
I think that the loudspeakers of the future will be sold by the gallon and spread like a paint on the walls, being made out of resonating crystals immersed into a viscous liquid made out of an organic conductive material connected to a dc current source and pumped by light.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.