I have only 10N20R and 10P20R. They have halve the current rating then the laterals you use.
Should the PSU voltage go down with these or can i parallel 2 ?
Should the PSU voltage go down with these or can i parallel 2 ?
SSA Power Amp - drain output & CCS & parallel mosfets
Output peak voltage headroom is always welcomed, so stay on +/-50 V rails PSU and parallel the outputs. Same gender type of mosfets should be matched within +/-5 % to successfully split output power dissipation evenly among them. 😉
Output peak voltage headroom is always welcomed, so stay on +/-50 V rails PSU and parallel the outputs. Same gender type of mosfets should be matched within +/-5 % to successfully split output power dissipation evenly among them. 😉
Attachments
Hi LC,
Can you help me improve this ?
it's based on your vssa
QuasiSSA.asc
R5 / R55 are not necessarily a good solution...
thanks
Can you help me improve this ?
it's based on your vssa
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
QuasiSSA.asc
R5 / R55 are not necessarily a good solution...
thanks
Last edited:
Simple and yet excellent DC coupled balanced circlotron. Ran the sim, looks very good. For the start implementing some familiar design improvements to get better THD at higher output levels, like enhanced VAS, driver stage, more parallel outputs, would do the job and make it stellar. Need some time to see what can be done. 

Yes, no problem with BC560C or enhanced VAS, driver stage is also crucial to get low THD driving laterals but then it wouldn't be simple symmetrical amplifier anymore.
Already found my best VAS, tried them all. Will be inside new First One modules.
Already found my best VAS, tried them all. Will be inside new First One modules.
I created a multithreaded application to run incremental ltspice batch simulations with as much parameter as desired and taking measurements to keep only the adapted ranges
It seems that the most suitable current for the VAS is 2.7mA with BC560C
409591 simulations and only 255 combination kept, 1h with my laptop (4thread)but only a few minutes with my dual xeon (32thread)
https://sites.google.com/site/solidcirclotron/BRUTE_FORCE.ods
It seems that the most suitable current for the VAS is 2.7mA with BC560C

409591 simulations and only 255 combination kept, 1h with my laptop (4thread)but only a few minutes with my dual xeon (32thread)
https://sites.google.com/site/solidcirclotron/BRUTE_FORCE.ods
Code:
"listeParam": [
{
"name": "PARAM_RA",
"value": 100,
"min": 100,
"max": 1000,
"inc": 10
},
{
"name": "PARAM_RB",
"value": 1000,
"min": 1000,
"max": 10000,
"inc": 2
}
],
"listeMeas": [
{
"code": "Ie(Q1)",
"min": 0.001,
"max": 0.016
},
{
"code": "Is(M3)",
"min": 0.2,
"max": 0.5
}
]
Last edited:
R5 / R55 are not necessarily a good solution...
They should go to the output source terminals.
hi banat it's nice to see you again, you already talked about bootstrap but I had not managed to work
Hi X , it is my pleasure !
I think in that configuration VAS bootstrap will work just fine , just split both R5/R55 and find optimum values for new four colectors resistors and two bootstrapp capacitors .
Best Regards !
I think in that configuration VAS bootstrap will work just fine , just split both R5/R55 and find optimum values for new four colectors resistors and two bootstrapp capacitors .
Best Regards !
Last edited:
It works regardless of feedback. I personally dislike trickeries like bootstrapping.
You could consider referring the emitter resistors of the input stage to ground.
You could consider referring the emitter resistors of the input stage to ground.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Simple Symetrical Amplifier