John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
For a larf, a recent outpouring from one of the stereophile writers The Problem With Tubes | AudioStream
This section caused me to smile

To my ears, amplifiers with low or no doses of feedback saturate the male and female vocal rage with rich tone and high levels of tactility. Amplifiers employing low or no-dose feedback deliver supple, bendy high-plasticity forms. Slightly larger doses tighten things up and raise the damping factor. Adding more than 30dB sounds like dragging a tin bar along a brick wall.


Sigh.
 
Quote:
To my ears, amplifiers with low or no doses of feedback saturate the male and female vocal rage with rich tone and high levels of tactility. Amplifiers employing low or no-dose feedback deliver supple, bendy high-plasticity forms. Slightly larger doses tighten things up and raise the damping factor. Adding more than 30dB sounds like dragging a tin bar along a brick wall.

That's one for pseuds corner for sure! good grief....
 
Thanks for putting that 'outpouring' up Bill. It gives us a place to start a discussion in how to make exceptionally sounding audio equipment, and secondly, what is wrong with most conventional designs: Too much negative feedback! This is the cause of added FM distortion, and that separates the winners from the 'also rans', like what so many here use and think adequate.
 
That's quite a stretch, John. Where's the frequency modulation showing up in the ultrahigh feedback ppm distortion monsters?


(To take it to the logical end, mind you I don't think ppm distortion is all that needed, albeit an intellectual exercise, much like a well performing z-gfb design might be)
 
Bill, of course. I mean most every distortion spec is into a resistive load, which obviously isn't what a speaker + wire is. More that these near-unobtanium levels of distortion are intellectual exercises more than anything else.

But I still haven't seen anything hinting at emergent frequency modulation or even phase modulation. Those have consequences that show up in stationary signals.
 
It did intrigue me that SL revisited his analog crossovers as his last big update on his website. I assume Nelson was helping out from some comments on there. It clearly wrankled him that he couldn't get the same performance from analog crossovers as digital.

Siegfried asked me to develop an analog crossover, as described at last
year's BAF, and which will be a kit in the diyAudio store next month. The
documents to be published shortly show his comparative acoustic results.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.