Soekris: Sonics? Comparisons to? & Other Stuff

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.

TNT

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
I am using the latest firmware and have had the problem with both computer/wave io and the SDTrans so I figured it was the DAC.

Where should I look for a problem?

Should I reload the firmware?

I thought it was odd this had not been fixed but I had got used to it. Was listening to an old orchestral CD with those "tracks" within the track and it is really obnoxious with those pressings.

Thanks,

Please list the actual CD album(s) and we could test this.

//
 
I guess one should bring up the biggest problem with the SOEKRIS DAC.

The lack of seamless transition from one track to the next - for recordings that seque from one track to another without a defined silence there is a momentary unwanted silence.

One gets used to it but never ceases to want it to behave as every other DAC I have ever used behaves.

One wonders if this is impossible with the SOEKRIS DAC? It has got better but it is still an annoyance.

IMO, I think the biggest problem with Soekris is the power supply. I can't say I am happy with the sound of the un-tweak verison (3)
 
Ok.

Looking forward to hearing more...


_-_-


If you are still looking for a completed R2R dac, do a search for Denafrips ARES which is a commercial R2R dac at around similar price of a completed Soekris.

I have both the Soekris and Ares. IMO, the stock form Ares already sound better than my modded Soekris. And I think one reason is Ares does a much better job at the power supplies. The large capacitor banks and I counted over 10 linear regulators (no switcher, thank god) in Aries, 5 is low noise lt1763 and some unknown one (don't know why they sand away the marking):confused:
 
I believe it's a serious indication than the layout is more important than the standalone dac chip choice ! We were victim of bad audio press about the dac chip design factor mithology...

Imho, take the majority of old dac chip, even a simple TDA 1545A chip carefully implemented sounds better than any Soekris. As the Soekris can sounds good when people share experience...
 
ChuckT, that stuff looks pretty interesting.

Wish they did not assume everyone wants to use a computer - I wish the USB card was an option. AND wish there was simple I2S input instead of the PSAudio HDMI scheme.

Other than that it is intriguing to me.

Thanks for the mention of them. Had never heard of them.
 
I believe it's a serious indication than the layout is more important than the standalone dac chip choice ! We were victim of bad audio press about the dac chip design factor mithology...

Imho, take the majority of old dac chip, even a simple TDA 1545A chip carefully implemented sounds better than any Soekris. As the Soekris can sounds good when people share experience...

Funny, I am listening to a 8 x tda1387 dac on the Rasberry pi3 on headphone while typing this. I believe tda1387 is just the smd version of the tda1545. I agree those old dac can sound pretty good with the right implementation.
 
ChuckT, that stuff looks pretty interesting.

Wish they did not assume everyone wants to use a computer - I wish the USB card was an option. AND wish there was simple I2S input instead of the PSAudio HDMI scheme.

Other than that it is intriguing to me.

Thanks for the mention of them. Had never heard of them.

I think you are looking at the higher end r2r dac. I believe the Ares is a newer and cheaper product which uses the latest Xmos xu208 audio receiver. It also uses the very good ak4118 for spdif input (Ares has 2 coax and 2 optical input).
I have only use the USB input myself and uses Intel NUC with Ubuntu and HQplayer to output usb audio.

Anyways, I will start a thread on the Ares dac later as I plan to modded it a bit. Unlike the Soekris, I don't think the Ares need too much tweaking as the power supply is already very good. But maybe some extra cap or premium cap here or there can still help:)
Just a tweaker at heart.:eek:

There is some high res photo of inside in the homepage
ARES - DENAFRIPS
 
Well there could be treasures out there which we were
not exposed too or wasn't adapted to commercial
audio applications. Too bad that Im not smart
enough to fiddle with digital stuff. Saw a thread
somewhere that another manufacturer had a
TDA 1541 dac which was a drop in replacement.
Who knows that chip could even sound better
then the double crown. Lol

Cheers
 
... and good luck with the MSOP package for diy soldering : with the price of the microscope and the heatsink, better to buy directly an AMR DAC !:D

As for those R2R DAC, are there any precise power supply and reference voltage design for it ?

Have they all good clock designs, isolated signals not popluted by the noise of the sources ?

It looks good but does it sound good....:eek:
 
Hi, I am using TPA BuffaloIII with I2S input from WaveIO and Pi3.

Thinking to build another better one (in SQ) with DDDAC 1794 and Soekris DAM 1021. Anyone compared those two can give me some advice?

Thank you.

Get a version of the Soekris. I parted out my dual mono BuffaloIII pretty soon after getting my DAM1021 up and running. It digs deeper, it's more engaging and it responds more obviously to changes in the source/transport.

Right now I don't think there's a $4000 dac on the market that beats it for resolution and musical engagement.

I am using decent readily available power regs. I have the 1021 (.05) and the 1121 (.02), both current versions, no modding yet. They're terrific bang for buck.


Mark
 
Last edited:
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.